Thought I'd take a look at how they compare with stats outside of per/game metrics to get rid of the minutes discrepancy (Paul George plays about 10 more minutes every night)
Categories that Hayward win are in blue, George in red
This is for this season only.
Misc. Advanced Stats
Paul George
Usage % 23.8
True Shooting % .530
PER 17.3
Off Rating 104
Def Rating 97
WIn Shares/48 games .145
Gordon Hayward
Usage % 23.9
True Shooting % .552
PER 16.2
Off Rating 109
Def Rating 110
WIn Shares/48 games .101
Per 36m
Paul George
PTS 16.9
STL 1.7
AST 3.6
REB 6.9
3P% .387
FG% .425
FTA 2.7
FT% .818
Gordon Hayward
PTS 18.3
STL 1
AST 3.4
REB 3.9
3P% .392
FG% .428
FTA 5.7
FT% .822
George has benefited from more minutes and essentially being the go-to guy, while Hayward's #'s may benefit from sometimes facing bench players, though he does actually play a lot of important minutes for Corbin.
Shockingly similar players, though, according to these stats.
Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
- Neon Black
- Starter
- Posts: 2,294
- And1: 19
- Joined: Jun 25, 2007
- Location: Salt Lake City
Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
- StocktonShorts
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,386
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Jun 02, 2009
-
Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
Hayward doesn't "win" defensive rating, as his is 13 points/possession higher than George's.
Keep in mind that D-Rating is the rating of the TEAM while that player is on the court, while O-Rating is isolated to just those possessions "used" by that player. (At least that's how Basketball Reference does it). So while they seem like parallel measures they're actually telling you very different things.
Edit: not exactly sure how B-R calculates their D-rating. Doesn't seem to be what I suggested. Does anyone know?
Keep in mind that D-Rating is the rating of the TEAM while that player is on the court, while O-Rating is isolated to just those possessions "used" by that player. (At least that's how Basketball Reference does it). So while they seem like parallel measures they're actually telling you very different things.
Edit: not exactly sure how B-R calculates their D-rating. Doesn't seem to be what I suggested. Does anyone know?

Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
-
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,794
- And1: 1,087
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
ORtg -- Offensive Rating; an estimate of points produced (players) or scored (teams) per 100 possessions.
DRtg -- Defensive Rating; an estimate of points allowed per 100 possessions.
Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
- Neon Black
- Starter
- Posts: 2,294
- And1: 19
- Joined: Jun 25, 2007
- Location: Salt Lake City
Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
Thanks for the correction; chalk defensive Rtg up to PG
Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
- StocktonShorts
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,386
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Jun 02, 2009
-
Re: Paul George vs. Too Big Yo
red4hf wrote:ORtg -- Offensive Rating; an estimate of points produced (players) or scored (teams) per 100 possessions.
DRtg -- Defensive Rating; an estimate of points allowed per 100 possessions.
Yeah, I've seen their explanation, which seems to suggest it's team defense. But then look at the defensive rating of the Jazz players: how can the lowest ratings all belong to big men? Shouldn't there be some guards with similar ratings?
