Rodney Stuckey appreciation thread (SPOT HOLDER)

chrbal · Post #1 » by **chrbal** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:11 am

Nothing has happened yet, but all signs point to it.

Han Solo · Post #2 » by **Han Solo** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:15 am

Stuckey reminds me of Royce White.

Umbra · Post #3 » by **Umbra** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:15 am

Trade Stuckey for another expiring! Lol.

Umbra · Post #4 » by **Umbra** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:16 am

Han Solo wrote:Stuckey reminds me of Royce White.

RW reminds you of Stuckey, Stuckey was here first. :lol:

menten · Post #5 » by **menten** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:17 am

omg it would be so awesome to see this ball stopper and offensive black hole gone

starfire81 · Post #6 » by **starfire81** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:20 am

Stuckey back in the starting lineup and pistons get off to a slow start once again. I can't wait until this guy is traded.

Burton · Post #7 » by **Burton** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:25 am

Stuckey and max for a stretch PF/C that expires in 2014, or 2015. I have no idea who that stretch PF/C is tho :/

Piston Pete · Post #8 » by **Piston Pete** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:25 am

ATL lost Lou Williams for the season from injury, correct?

Stuckey to ATL for Devin Harris (expiring) and a pick?

Or Stuckey to ATL for Morrow/Petro (both expirings) and a pick?

menten · Post #9 » by **menten** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:26 am

Burton wrote:Stuckey and max for a stretch PF/C that expires in 2014, or 2015. I have no idea who that stretch PF/C is tho :/

channing frye maybe? i doubt we'll get much more for fiddy

Kilo · Post #10 » by **Kilo** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:28 am

I think we could take on longer term salary with a Stuckey trade since Tay was moved for an expiring that we must have figured would be on our books next season. We don't need $40M in contract space.

Han Solo · Post #11 » by **Han Solo** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:28 am

Umbra wrote:
Han Solo wrote:Stuckey reminds me of Royce White.

RW reminds you of Stuckey, Stuckey was here first.

Not talking game. Talking emotional makeup. Stuckey got issues.

Umbra · Post #12 » by **Umbra** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:31 am

Han Solo wrote:
Umbra wrote:
Han Solo wrote:Stuckey reminds me of Royce White.

RW reminds you of Stuckey, Stuckey was here first.

Not talking game. Talking emotional makeup. Stuckey got issues.

And Joe D puts a premium on high character people playing for this team lol.

Han Solo · Post #13 » by **Han Solo** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:32 am

Umbra wrote:
Han Solo wrote:Stuckey reminds me of Royce White.

RW reminds you of Stuckey, Stuckey was here first.

Not talking game. Talking emotional makeup. Stuckey got issues.[/quote]

And Joe D puts a premium on high character people playing for this team lol.[/quote]

Considering Dumars extended him, you're absolutely right.

ComboGuardCity · Post #14 » by **ComboGuardCity** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:53 am

Stuckey and Max for Wilson Chandler.

No-Man · Post #15 » by **No-Man** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:08 am

Stuckey contract isnt fully guaranteed, he's going to be cut next summer, so, who cares.

DetroitDon15 · Post #16 » by **DetroitDon15** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:19 pm

I love the idea of Stuckey for Harris. I wouldn't need a pick there. I will admit that if we deal Stuckey for a guard that Knight probably moves to SG till years end.

Kilo · Post #17 » by **Kilo** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:47 pm

Stuckey has got to go. He's a malcontent and isn't going to get any better bringing in another guard to take minutes from him. Ideally we could move him for a short term SF starter. Or package him (with Maxiell?)l for a decent enough 20 minute capable back up center.

Jodi · Post #18 » by **Jodi** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:57 pm

Keep Stuckey...We could still draft a SG or sign a SG in the summer and play Stuckey as our 6th man...I don't see a problem with keep a guy who can play the 2 or 1...

Mr. Krabs · Post #19 » by **Mr. Krabs** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:06 pm

Jodi wrote:Keep Stuckey...We could still draft a SG or sign a SG in the summer and play Stuckey as our 6th man...I don't see a problem with keep a guy who can play the 2 or 1...

He needs to be in a team who has bigs that can stretch the defense. With Monroe, Drummond and Maxiell being exclusively inside scorers Stuckey can not go to the already packed rim. We need good shooting and passing guards which will prevent defenses to double team Greg. That's why starting both Knight and Calderon makes sense: you cannot leave them open when Greg has the ball on the low post and with Drummond being a dunk threat every play the ball movement will be much easier.

Jodi · Post #20 » by **Jodi** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:14 pm

But Knight is a little dude...He'll get injured playing against opposing 2-guards...If we put Knight at the 2 it'll mess up his PG development big time...

If Stuckey doesn't fit will with Moose and Max lets keep Stuckey as our 6th man...Charlie V, Drummond, and Stuckey play well together...If we trade Stuckey we won't have a capable 6th man...