ImageImage

2013 Off Season Thread - Working On Ext For Burnett - Pg 129

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#81 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Tue Jan 29, 2013 11:16 pm

No surprise: Queens interested in Donald Driver.

http://www.startribune.com/sports/blogs ... um=twitter

Are the Vikings about to plunder the Packers for another castoff veteran skill position player? A TV station in Green Bay says they just might:

The Green Bay Packers may not be asking their all-time leading receiver Donald Driver back next year, but that doesn’t necessarily mean other teams aren’t interested in seeing what is left in the tank. FOX 11 has learned that the Minnesota Vikings would have an interest in the 37-year-old free agent wide receiver if he does not decide to retire.

The question is whether or not Driver wants to play for another team, much less a hated division rival after 14 years with the Packers. The Packers have given no indication they have a desire to sign Driver, but he has been reluctant to consider going to another team for fear of tarnishing his Packers legacy. However, he has not ruled it out completely.

“I think I could go to any team and be either their number one or number two guy and be solid for another three years, “ Driver told FOX 11 two weeks ago.

Driver will be 38 soon and his reception total has gone down every year since 2006 -- all the way down to just 8 grabs this past season while he battled injuries. Any interest, Vikings fans? At the very least, it would give Stu another guy to Hunt Down in a few years.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#82 » by [RCG] » Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:11 am

PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:No surprise: Queens interested in Donald Driver.

http://www.startribune.com/sports/blogs ... um=twitter

“I think I could go to any team and be either their number one or number two guy and be solid for another three years, “ Driver told FOX 11 two weeks ago.


:o

He's a little delusional. It would be a mistake. I think he'd quickly find out that he doesn't have it anymore and would tarnish his legacy needlessly.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 21,826
And1: 5,515
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#83 » by BUCKnation » Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:52 am

They like our sloppy seconds.
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,957
And1: 5,168
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#84 » by WRau1 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:23 am

Driver would be an idiot to sign w/ any NFC North team, Packer fans would take a long time to forgive that. Just retire and live out the rest of your days as a WI sports hero.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 29,516
And1: 14,730
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#85 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:28 am

If he can get a 3yr/5mill contract out of somebody, I can't say I blame him. Yeah, its cool to finish your career on a high note, but how many of us retire young. Most want the comfort of a few more paychecks, and I'm sure its the same with DD. He could do a lot of good for his family and community if he keeps playing.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#86 » by Newz » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:47 pm

The more I think about it, the more I really want us to go after Revis if he is really available.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 113,949
And1: 47,681
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#87 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:02 pm

Newz wrote:The more I think about it, the more I really want us to go after Revis if he is really available.


Absolutely. I think a 1st and 3rd, if that's what it takes, is a small price to pay for a defensive stud that could be around for Rodgers' prime.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#88 » by [RCG] » Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:24 pm

DrugBust wrote:
Newz wrote:The more I think about it, the more I really want us to go after Revis if he is really available.


Absolutely. I think a 1st and 3rd, if that's what it takes, is a small price to pay for a defensive stud that could be around for Rodgers' prime.


Which is why I think the Patriots are involved. Brady's window is closing and Devis would provide a bona fide stud to get them back to the SB before they have to move on.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 29,378
And1: 20,101
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
     

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#89 » by RiotPunch » Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:57 pm

I really, really doubt the Jets would trade Revis to New England, even if their package is the best on the table.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#90 » by Newz » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:14 pm

DrugBust wrote:
Newz wrote:The more I think about it, the more I really want us to go after Revis if he is really available.


Absolutely. I think a 1st and 3rd, if that's what it takes, is a small price to pay for a defensive stud that could be around for Rodgers' prime.


I might even be willing to offer more than that. I know Revis is hurt, but with guys coming back from knee surgeries and performing better all of the time, I think it's worth the risk.

When he is healthy, he is BY FAR the best corner in the NFL.
User avatar
DigitalFool
Veteran
Posts: 2,642
And1: 183
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#91 » by DigitalFool » Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:51 pm

My concern with Revis is that he is in his last year and the contract terms don't allow the franchise tag. He also wants a mega deal (that would HAVE to be done at time of trade). So now you risk guaranteeing a lot of money (and picks) to not even see him post injury on the field. I just don't see it happening.
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 29,378
And1: 20,101
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
     

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#92 » by RiotPunch » Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:16 pm

Floyd is becoming just as big of a pipe-dream as Ansah at this point... :( What a bummer.
#FreeChuckDiesel
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#93 » by eagle13 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:49 pm

DigitalFool wrote:My concern with Revis is that he is in his last year and the contract terms don't allow the franchise tag. He also wants a mega deal (that would HAVE to be done at time of trade). So now you risk guaranteeing a lot of money (and picks) to not even see him post injury on the field. I just don't see it happening.

The idea of Revis is better than the actuality due to reasons stated by Dig. I pass.
Besides if we're gonna trade multiple high picks I'd rather trade for a stud pass rusher - be it a DL or LB - be it a proven vet or to move up in draft. Our CBs are already pretty good and a stronger pas rush would make them even more effective.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#94 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:52 pm

eagle13 wrote:
DigitalFool wrote:My concern with Revis is that he is in his last year and the contract terms don't allow the franchise tag. He also wants a mega deal (that would HAVE to be done at time of trade). So now you risk guaranteeing a lot of money (and picks) to not even see him post injury on the field. I just don't see it happening.

The idea of Revis is better than the actuality due to reasons stated by Dig. I pass.
Besides if we're gonna trade multiple high picks I'd rather trade for a stud pass rusher - be it a DL or LB - be it a proven vet or to move up in draft. Our CBs are already pretty good and a stronger pas rush would make them even more effective.


+1
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#95 » by Newz » Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:59 pm

How many players in this draft are going to be better than a healthy Revis? How many players in the entire league are better than a healthy Revis?

Five, maybe? Ten? Just based on how good he is and how good he is compared to the other players at his position, he is likely a top 10 player in the NFL. Possibly top 5 since he plays an impact position.
User avatar
Marley2Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 11,968
And1: 2,922
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
     

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#96 » by Marley2Hendrix » Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:29 am

Newz wrote:How many players in this draft are going to be better than a healthy Revis? How many players in the entire league are better than a healthy Revis?

Five, maybe? Ten? Just based on how good he is and how good he is compared to the other players at his position, he is likely a top 10 player in the NFL. Possibly top 5 since he plays an impact position.


Indeed. The value of having one of the best players in football cannot be overstated. Just as Rodgers brings up the rest of our offense, Revis would have a somewhat similar impact on defense.

He is great.

Greatness tends to have a profound impact, and I'm not shy about paying a steep price for it.
You gotta make it sexy! Hips and nips, otherwise I'm not eating.
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 17,663
And1: 9,267
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#97 » by jakecronus8 » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:54 am

DigitalFool wrote:My concern with Revis is that he is in his last year and the contract terms don't allow the franchise tag. He also wants a mega deal (that would HAVE to be done at time of trade). So now you risk guaranteeing a lot of money (and picks) to not even see him post injury on the field. I just don't see it happening.


I guess it comes down to how much is a year of having the best player at his position worth. For a team whose window is closer to being closed than some want to believe, I think he's worth the risk. If you trade tramon for another pick it won't hurt the depth as much.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
DigitalFool
Veteran
Posts: 2,642
And1: 183
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#98 » by DigitalFool » Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:06 am

I don't disagree he's an DPOY elite talent, but where I pause is the contract he'll most likely demand. No way we'd give up a 1st and 3rd for a one year rental, so you have to be OK giving him what, 6yrs/100mil 50 mil guaranteed? I'm not saying I'd be against it, I just think we have a lot of $$$ to pay out in the next couple years, and if Revis would happen, I think some of our young talent is gone.
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,365
And1: 2,564
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#99 » by Ill-yasova » Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:16 am

I know this isn't Packers related but it's still pretty cool for all of the Badgers fans here.
http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/189105461.html
J.J. Watt gets it.

He'll interact with fans on his Twitter account on occasion, but the former Badger from Pewaukee seems to have a soft spot for kids.

Recently, a YouTube video made the rounds - and made its way to Watt - of a 6-year-old crying because she can't marry Watt.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=938Scds6fZA[/youtube]
Click on the first link for the rest of the story.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 34,073
And1: 18,376
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: 2013 Off Season Thread 

Post#100 » by humanrefutation » Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:36 am

eagle13 wrote:
DigitalFool wrote:My concern with Revis is that he is in his last year and the contract terms don't allow the franchise tag. He also wants a mega deal (that would HAVE to be done at time of trade). So now you risk guaranteeing a lot of money (and picks) to not even see him post injury on the field. I just don't see it happening.

The idea of Revis is better than the actuality due to reasons stated by Dig. I pass.
Besides if we're gonna trade multiple high picks I'd rather trade for a stud pass rusher - be it a DL or LB - be it a proven vet or to move up in draft. Our CBs are already pretty good and a stronger pas rush would make them even more effective.


I agree with both of these posts.

Return to Green Bay Packers