Crowned wrote:I really don't think the team needs a veteran goaltender at all. I really don't see the point in it. Let the young guys play (good or not) and get a good draft pick this year. There's a lot of talent in the top of this draft, much better than last years draft.
I don't want to acquire a vet. goaltender in the season but this offseason. Lets tank w/ our current goaltending situation (b/c we're not going to make any noise w/ Reimer & Scrivens) and assess our players with who stays and goes (reassess who the core of the team is).
The purpose of bringing in a starting veteran is to take the pressure off a prospect to properly develop and not have the pressures of the media/everything else on him. There's rare talents and kids who are much more mature beyond their years but those are far and few in between. The last time the Leafs has a good young goalie who panned out was Potvin and he had to unseat Fuhr. Even in Boston they were in no rush to get rid of Thomas to make room for Rask.
I just think it's smart management to bring someone in who has experience with the daily pressure of being a starting goaltender in the league. It allows the prospect to develop at their own pace and it also goes in line w/ the ideal of earning your minutes. This franchise (due to lack of depth) hasn't been great by setting a precedent w/ it's players that ice time is earned. I know it's a 2 way street and vets shouldn't be given minutes without earning them either.
Bringing in Bernier could work or he could leave us in the exact same boat we're sitting in; hoping a goaltending prospect reaches his potential in one of the most media heavy markets in the league. I'm not completely opposed to Bernier but I wouldn't give up anything of value because it's a pretty big risk.




























