
My dad likes to say, "It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove any doubt."
Not feeling my posts lately, huh?

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:My dad likes to say, "It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove any doubt."
Dat2U wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Dat2U wrote:The problem is every single game becomes a referendum on Wall for you. EVERY SINGLE GAME!!! It gets old as f*ck.
Three years ago I said before the draft he was overrated. I said Cousins is better. I took a lot of crap then from you and a bunch of people. What gets old is being right, repeatedly. Yet years go by for people to come around if ever to what I said years ago.
You guys don't like me talking about Wall because you said he would be the better than Jason Kidd and he would be the greatest at the PG position. Heck, at times AJ Price runs PG better. You can get mad about game-by-game referendums, or you can say, "I wonder what kind of PG Marcus Smart would be?"
Wall is a nice kid and extremely gifted athletically. He is still 22 years old. He is rich and will be in the league for years and years. Things will get better than they are now for him. He could stay a Wizard and prove me wrong. If the team plays like they did for about 10 games for a whole season, he might. I think they are a house of cards if they count on Nene's health. Trading Wall for me is a chance to get rid of an injury-prone guy.
I think Wall's up and down play is what is irksome. If there is any referendum it is all on his inconsistent, but typically so, game.
You took a lot of crap for wanting Cousins over Wall. And rightfully so. Cousins has been an unmitigated disaster in Sacramento. Only reason us Wizards fans want him is because he might be available for pennies on the dollar in relation to his talent. No one ever really doubted Cousins talent, just his mental makeup. I'm just glad we didn't draft him because he would have already been on his 2nd team by now.
As for Wall, have I been disappointed by his development? Yes. But not to the point where I'm ready to trade him for any mediocre guard you covet and a middlin' 1st round pick. And I can't help but think the Wizards front office have absolutely done Wall no favors when it comes to putting him into the best position to succeed. They've been as much of a hindrance to Wall as his broken jump shot with the lack of talent, poor skill and subpar coaching they've surrounded him with.
Frankly I thought Wall was closer to the guy we saw get a triple double and a 9 steal game in his first two weeks as a pro. He played recklessly but with a ton of energy & attitude and with a jumper that was inconsistent but passable. More like a guy that shot 30% from 3 his rookie year. That's the Wall I thought we were getting. This Wall is a bit more passive, more tentative and the shot is still work in progress but now without the range from 3.
Again, I really do wonder how Wall would have done had he gone to any other team. I suspect he'd be further along than he is now.
To Kings assistant coach Pete Carril, Cousins is something he has never seen before.
“I’ve been in the pros 13 years now … he’s the first and perhaps authentic … only original, different type of player that I’ve seen,” Carril said before the broadcast of tonight’s game on NBA TV. “There’s certain things you can’t teach and he does all of them.”
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Who else wants some?
I know you're probably not going to agree but I will tell you why I am very firm in my convictions and where I disagree with you.
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:tontoz, you like to argue and I've been down this road with you before. I don't feel in the slightest bit conflicted. Wall played at a PER of about 21 for several games (7 or so) during the Wizards 7-3 stretch over 10 games. I noted defensive improvements and scoring that was helping a team win.
There is a key adverb: WHEN
You highlighted the rest as if to say he will. And even then I said he would become a candidate when that happens. What I didn't say is Wall can shoot like Archibald. If Wall ups his 17 shots per 36 minutes, to about 25 shots, and if he plays along better teammates he could score over 27 points a game while generating 11 or more assists. That is entirely POSSIBLE.
If he learns to shoot Wall will score a lot of points along with his many assists.
But for the last time, tontoz, timing is everything. That optimism for Wall's breakout is gone and looking at the time it will take for that to happen I think there are better players on the horizon. Wall IS like Payton. He can score and he can assist. However, he's woefully bad shooting the ball and he has turned it over A LOT.
You didn't put me on both sides of any fence. You fenced yourself in trying to make me the victim of your angst over what I said.
You also NEVER ANSWERED MY QUESTION, tontoz. I asked you how has he improved. I admit I thought he had games back but if you look at this: http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... ljo01.html with a larger sample size of games THIS SEASON, I don't see improvement.
If you go to school and get an A the first quarter, but you follow it with C, B, C what is your overall grade?
A lot of comparisons have been made between Wall and Wade, Wall and Derrick Rose, and even Wall and Gary Payton. Those all apply IMO. I will throw one more out there.
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I think Chris Paul had an MVP-type I have been a Wall hater and was wrong in being one. He's really good and will very likely be worthy of being mentioned in their company in the future.
tontoz wrote:From the same thread i referenced earlier.Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I think Chris Paul had an MVP-type I have been a Wall hater and was wrong in being one. He's really good and will very likely be worthy of being mentioned in their company in the future.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
TGW wrote:Oh, I want some, CCJ. You can't fight facts, buddy. Screw Pete Carrill...I don't give a rats butt what that guy has to say, because the facts are there.
Cousins TS% by year: .484, .499, .507
Cousins EFG% by year: .432, .449, .447
For a big man, that is HORRIFIC. Even Seraphin has a higher TS% and EFG% than that, and he stinks. I'm not giving up picks for a better rebounding Seraphin with a sh*t attitude.
"However, he likes getting paid and so far the worst is a bunch of technicals and a few team suspensions. SO FAR no weapons, drugs, sex assaults, etc." -- LOL really? That's your defense to his terrible attitude?
"Hey well the guy hasn't killed anyone yet, so he's okay in my book." -- Wow what a backhanded compliment...
TGW wrote:
*EDIT*: And to address the PER argument--PER awards rebounds and assists equally, although is much tougher to average 10 assists than to average 10 rebounds. It's a highly flawed stat made up by BSPN to evaluate players without watching games, and is not a good indicator of anything...a good statpadder can have a high PER (Cousins is a perfect example of that).
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:tontoz, you like to argue and I've been down this road with you before. I don't feel in the slightest bit conflicted. Wall played at a PER of about 21 for several games (7 or so) during the Wizards 7-3 stretch over 10 games. I noted defensive improvements and scoring that was helping a team win.
Dat2U wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:tontoz, you like to argue and I've been down this road with you before. I don't feel in the slightest bit conflicted. Wall played at a PER of about 21 for several games (7 or so) during the Wizards 7-3 stretch over 10 games. I noted defensive improvements and scoring that was helping a team win.
The reason I never bought into that stretch of good play was because it relied on such a fragile setup. Nene's health, Wall's health. Beal's shooting & health & continued high level play from Okafor & Webster. It was too much to rely upon. Everything had to run perfect for us to be mediocre and it never does. We simply aren't equipped to handle losses to any of our top players.
As soon as Beal gets hurt and Garrett Temple is inserted into the starting lineup, the wheels basically fall off. Spacing is wrecked. Defenses daring anyone including Wall to shoot as many jumpers as possible. With Wall's questionable shot, you need two shooters minimum on the floor with him otherwise spacing is just going to make things impossible.
The roster is just oddly constructed. Our offense really makes no sense either. We've got Nene, who honestly probably should be a C at this stage of his career, playing PF and half the time were running our offense through him instead of Wall, while Wall on the floor often standing around at the 3 point line waiting for a pass. Huh?
Wall has been set up to fail by the level of ineptitude here since they rolled out the red carpet for his welcome to DC. Maybe if he was LeBron or Durant he would be able to overcome it and shine as one of the NBA's brightest but I seriously doubt if even they could overcome the likes of Ted & EG their minions or Flip Saunders assistants to win anything of significance in a Wizards uniform.
montestewart wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Nivek wrote:Umm..."WHEN" is an adverb.
{ducks}
Wow, you're quick, Nivek.![]()
I edited it BEFORE the grammar police busted me.
I learned "WHEN" can also be a conjunction.
We can have our stats wrong, our analysis wrong, our history wrong, but our spelling, grammar, and usage better come correct.
hands11 wrote:Dame right it better be.