jman3134 wrote:Even if he supplants Arthur, what you are not understanding is that he's still not playing a major role. He's still a bench option. Rudy Gay, for better or for worse, was a very significant part of our rotation.
It looks more like Davis is meant to take over for Randolph in a year or two. I've heard a couple people compare his game to a young Zach Randolph (albeit in a very different body). He's good on the offensive glass and finishes around the rim very well. Z-Bo's made quite a career out of doing just that.
I'm not a fan of the trade, mostly because of this season. But at least we got someone who could be a core player, even if it means Randolph's days may be numbered.
If Davis becomes a 16/10 guy, and we are somehow able to swap Randolph for a good wing player like Granger next year, then this will all look a lot better, as we will have a new "big four" that is just as productive as the old one but much less costly.
Also, in that study by Robert Ayer that i mentioned in another thread, it was shown to be the case that the one of the best combinations of players to build a team around is:
- a high scoring, shot-blocking, rebounding Center (which I think Gasol is, although his scoring/rebounding numbers are somewhat below his talent level because he plays so much high post with Randolph playing more around the basket)
and
- a PF who is an excellent rebounder and defender (Ed Davis seems to fit this mold)
Just a thought.