realgm internet cliques? board ethics over making threads? i hope you realize just how crazed and ridiculicious you look. and because i pm'ed a moderator and requested a merge (to make you happy btw. because apparently what's important to you is that your thread is at the top of the board and has posts in it) that means we're a clique in cahoots against you?
this whole sequence is the most hilarious thing i've seen all night, even more hysterical than seeing my lakers get blown out yet again on national television. it may be time to take a break from the internet if posting on a message board is this serious to you.
New P.E.D Scandal
Moderator: TyCobb
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,283
- And1: 810
- Joined: Jul 28, 2010
- Location: REALITY
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
destro wrote:it may be time to take a break from the internet if posting on a message board means this much to you.
Look at your post count & date joined compared to mine. You have twice as many posts as me & you joined 6 months later than me

Dude, you're still talking to me & I've already said that I was done with the situation. Regarding this portion of your post, maybe you should follow that advice. It was you, not me, that created multiple threads of a subject that already had a thread. That's an obvious sign of you needing to be the OP.
I'm trying to be done with the convo & leave the thread, but you instigate an argument every time that I leave.
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:destro wrote:it may be time to take a break from the internet if posting on a message board means this much to you.
Look at your post count & date joined compared to mine. You have twice as many posts as me & you joined 6 months later than me.
and despite that not once in my 17,000 posts have i cried about my thread not being posted in. so who's really losing in the end?
BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:Dude, you're still talking to me & I've already said that I was done with the situation. Regarding this portion of your post, maybe you should follow that advice. It was you, not me, that created multiple threads of a subject that already had a thread. That's an obvious sign of you needing to be the OP.
I'm trying to be done with the convo & leave the thread, but you instigate an argument every time that I leave.
me pm'ing a moderator and getting the threads merged is a clear indication that i don't care about being op, this whole thing is really not that important to me. i'm just here to talk baseball. you being sensitive about threads and now for whatever reason unable to leave shows that you have anything but baseball on your mind.
and since this is a baseball forum and no baseball is being talked about because of this, allow me to show you how to leave by me promptly leaving this thread.
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,252
- And1: 9,956
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,851
- And1: 72,250
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
TyCobb wrote:What in the hell...
Yeah, this is pretty sad.
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,283
- And1: 810
- Joined: Jul 28, 2010
- Location: REALITY
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
Duffman100 wrote:TyCobb wrote:What in the hell...
Yeah, this is pretty sad.
So, neither one of you long time posters have a problem with 3 "Kobe Bryant is traded" threads being open at the same time?....It's the very reason that threads are locked daily on every RealGM board. Threads are locked/merged because it's the same subject or they're locked because it's a troll thread, which I'm sure happens on both of you guys' home boards.
I honestly can't believe that I'm actually being forced to defend myself over pointing it out. If you're upset about me calling that particular guy out, just say it. I said what I needed to say yesterday & exited your board. I'm only posting now in response to the two comments that I'm quoting.
Regarding the mods post above, you could have PM'd me if there was a problem with anything that I posted in these 3 (now merged) threads. Your public comment isn't warranted at all, but since you decided to publicly comment, please explain to me how I'm wrong.
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,252
- And1: 9,956
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DNBBrkIPN8[/youtube]
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,283
- And1: 810
- Joined: Jul 28, 2010
- Location: REALITY
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
So, now it's whining & crying when an adult points things out on a message board
.
Maybe, if you were doing your job as a mod, there would have never been an issue to "cry" about
.

Maybe, if you were doing your job as a mod, there would have never been an issue to "cry" about

Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,252
- And1: 9,956
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
Maybe if you drew attention to this 'problem' in a PM like another poster did then this wouldn't have escalated into the eyesore that it became.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
- Duffman100
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 47,851
- And1: 72,250
- Joined: Jun 27, 2002
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal

Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,283
- And1: 810
- Joined: Jul 28, 2010
- Location: REALITY
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
TyCobb wrote:Maybe if you drew attention to this 'problem' in a PM like another poster did then this wouldn't have escalated into the eyesore that it became.
Why should I have to PM you to inform you that there are multiple threads of the same subject on your board?..... You & others dismissing the fact that I correctly pointed out the multiple threads kinda shows that I was correct about the Clique (regulars) portion of my posts. You ignoring the basis of this issue & instead, deciding to join other posters in calling out my posts as "crying", is simply showing your bias.
I refuse to get into a flame-war with you, though. I will let you guys get the last word(s).
Duffman100 wrote::lol: Dude, who cares? It's a message board.
You're right, Duffman. It's why I exited the thread yesterday & will do so now. All that I did was point out an issue. I wasn't expecting to be attacked by multiple posters for doing so.
Honestly, I was just surprised to see you & a mod chime in on my posts in this thread. If what I pointed out was wrong, I would laugh at myself right along with you guys. Considering that I was right, I wasn't expecting the posts that I read.
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,252
- And1: 9,956
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: New P.E.D Scandal
Thanks for your contribution to this board.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Return to The General MLB Board