Pistons looking to move Stuckey

Joe Berry · Post #1 » by **Joe Berry** » Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:29 pm

according to poopsworld, **** source, but i still hope it is true

"Detroit is a player"
...
League sources peg Stuckey as the easiest chip to move and there is belief that Detroit is more than open to a deal involving one or both.
..

Read more at http://www.hoopsworld.com/nba-am-deals- ... Bt6zh3B.99

Charlie V, Maxiell and Bynum are also mentioned as trade candidates, Pistons have been linked to Josh Smith and Gerald Henderson according to this article, cant really copy&paste, take a look

Sheeeeed · Post #2 » by **Sheeeeed** » Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:32 pm

It sounds like to me they're linking Josh Smith to the Pistons based on past rumors.

DetroitPistons · Post #3 » by **DetroitPistons** » Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:43 pm

I hope Dumars makes another trade or two to clear out guys like Stuckey and Bynum but I'll be very upset he tries to trade for Smith and gives him the max. We need wings, not a guy who plays the same position as our best player.

Piston Pete · Post #4 » by **Piston Pete** » Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:48 pm

Guys I would love to have traded between now and the deadline for young assets, cap relief, and/or picks:

Stuckey
Maxiell
Bynum
Jerebko
English

Natopher · Post #5 » by **Natopher** » Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:49 pm

Agreed. If we needed a PF then I'd probably be interested in Smith, but as it stands I don't want to get him, ESPECIALLY if we have to trade assets for him. I'd much rather try and pry Granger away from IND after this season. My guess is they'd be willing to trade him during the draft to get some cap space with how George has played this year.

fekz · Post #6 » by **fekz** » Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:54 pm

don't want gerald henderson. Don't want josh smith if we have to overpay

Post #7 » by **theBigLip** » Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:09 pm

Regardless of the credibility of Hoopsworld, it makes sense that we would be shopping Stuckey. I'm not sure how much his buyout is for next year, but I think he would be a good addition to a team that wants some depth at both guard spots for a playoff run. You'd only have to pay him for half of this season and buy him out next year (or keep him if he actually fit). We just need to dump him for expirings and hopefully get something tangible (future draft pick?) for the trouble.

DetroitDon15 · Post #8 » by **DetroitDon15** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:55 pm

theBigLip wrote:Regardless of the credibility of Hoopsworld, it makes sense that we would be shopping Stuckey. I'm not sure how much his buyout is for next year, but I think he would be a good addition to a team that wants some depth at both guard spots for a playoff run. You'd only have to pay him for half of this season and buy him out next year (or keep him if he actually fit). We just need to dump him for expirings and hopefully get something tangible (future draft pick?) for the trouble.

I agree i'd take an expiring for him but who has an 8.5 mill expiring to deal? I'd do Stuckey and the BG TPE for Jackson and Blair with cutting Jackson after the deal.

Piston Pete · Post #9 » by **Piston Pete** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:02 pm

I don't know guys....sooner or later, we need to start trading for actual assets instead of just expirings.

Especially if we trade some of our valuable expirings like Bynum or Maxiell -- or Stuckey, who is still one of our better players.

We need to be searching other rosters for young wings to try and add to Knight/Monroe/Drummond.....or get picks to get wings with.

DetroitDon15 · Post #10 » by **DetroitDon15** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:07 pm

Piston Pete wrote:I don't know guys....sooner or later, we need to start trading for actual assets instead of just expirings.

We need to be searching other rosters for young wings to try and add to Knight/Monroe/Drummond.....or get picks to get wings with.

The problem is that picks are worth alot more nowadays than in previous years. The salary cap has done that. Teams don't give them away anymore. The win no idea isn't as strong as before. I though the Celtics shoulda trade pick(s) once Rondo went down if they didn't plan on dealing Garnett/Pierce.

Piston Pete · Post #11 » by **Piston Pete** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:10 pm

DetroitDon15 wrote:
Piston Pete wrote:I don't know guys....sooner or later, we need to start trading for actual assets instead of just expirings.

We need to be searching other rosters for young wings to try and add to Knight/Monroe/Drummond.....or get picks to get wings with.

The problem is that picks are worth alot more nowadays than in previous years. The salary cap has done that. Teams don't give them away anymore. The win no idea isn't as strong as before. I though the Celtics shoulda trade pick(s) once Rondo went down if they didn't plan on dealing Garnett/Pierce.

The Celtics just lost Barbosa too. They seem like a perfect fit for Stuckey!!

retrolenny · Post #12 » by **retrolenny** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:28 pm

The Celtics are cursed this year. I can see them trading a player for Stuckey and Stuckey having a season ending injury on his first game!!!

Post #13 » by **theBigLip** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:00 pm

I'd happily trade Stuckey for an injured Sullinger.

Post #14 » by **theBigLip** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:04 pm

Piston Pete wrote:I don't know guys....sooner or later, we need to start trading for actual assets instead of just expirings.

Especially if we trade some of our valuable expirings like Bynum or Maxiell -- or Stuckey, who is still one of our better players.

We need to be searching other rosters for young wings to try and add to Knight/Monroe/Drummond.....or get picks to get wings with.

I agree, but I think that starts next year. This summer is "THE SUMMER OF CAP SPACE". We may not have another for a long time (unless for some reason we don't spend this summer). Any extra cap space we get this summer, we can actually use 100% of it because we will be below the cap. In the future, if we are over the cap, dropping 8mil off our payroll just saves us money, but this summer we can actually spend it without limitation. That's why we also need to amnesty CV as well.

vege · Post #15 » by **vege** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:58 pm

I could see either Boston or Portland being interest in Stuckey.

Portland has no bench and Stuckey would fit well with either Lillard or Matthews.

Boston showed interest in Stuckey before and they need him badly now.

I don't know what either team can offer tho. Portland can offer a few small useless expirings, Boston can offer long term contract like Jeff Green or Courtney Lee.

Maybe Houston could use him to play behind Lin and Harden? but then again, Houston is actually a good FA destination so they should value cap space even more than us.

Dallas could use him but same as Houston.

"Seattle" would make sense but with their ownership situation I doubt they can do any moves.

Jodi · Post #16 » by **Jodi** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:15 pm

I could see Stuckey being traded to Utah or Phoenix...

Natopher · Post #17 » by **Natopher** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:40 pm

vege wrote:I could see either Boston or Portland being interest in Stuckey.

Portland has no bench and Stuckey would fit well with either Lillard or Matthews.

Boston showed interest in Stuckey before and they need him badly now.

I don't know what either team can offer tho. Portland can offer a few small useless expirings, Boston can offer long term contract like Jeff Green or Courtney Lee.

Maybe Houston could use him to play behind Lin and Harden? but then again, Houston is actually a good FA destination so they should value cap space even more than us.

Dallas could use him but same as Houston.

"Seattle" would make sense but with their ownership situation I doubt they can do any moves.

I'd trade Stuckey for Courtney Lee in a heartbeat. He plays good defense and is really good at corner 3's, not a bad 3pt shooter overall. His contract is also pretty good (imo) 5mil per year/4 years. I'd definitely like to have him as our backup 2 next year.

NickLidstrom · Post #18 » by **NickLidstrom** » Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:32 pm

Stuckey for Udrih (expiring) and Mil's lotto-protected 1st?