AndroidMan wrote:johnnywishbone wrote:^^
Iran has destroyed Lebannon by creating a state within a state and assassinated the President of the country.
Iran is the main benefactor of the Syrian President who has killed tens of thousands of his own people over the last couple of years.
Iran murdered 300 US marines in the 1983 Beiruit Embassy bombing.
Iran is constantly undermining America's efforts to create a stable democracy in Afghanistan.
Iran supplies Hezbollah and Hamas with rockets to shoot at Israel.
Iran supplied and trained the Mahdi army who created a civil war inside Iraq and killed US servicemen.
Iran "invented" airplane hijacking.
Iran brought in Lebanese mercenaries to beat their own people who protested the results of their last election.
In Iran the government actually has a saying - everyone is guilty, we just don't know of what (yet).
All of that is opinion. If you can show me where iran has invaded another country I will confess I was wrong, until then you are still a creepy guy. Seriously though, if you live in Hawaii, why are you on the computer all damn day. Go live life and enjoy a little bit, and give people the impression that you actually enjoy your life outside of realgm.
I don't think there is any argument that President Assad's main benefactor is Iran.
On October 3 and December 28, 2001, the families of 241 servicemen who were killed as well as several injured survivors filed civil suits against Islamic Republic of Iran and the Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [46] In their separate complaints, the families and survivors sought a judgment that Iran was responsible for the attack and relief in the form of damages (compensatory and punitive) for wrongful death and common-law claims for battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress resulting from an act of state-sponsored terrorism.[46]
Iran (the defendants) was served with the two complaints (one from Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple, et al., the other from Joseph and Marie Boulos, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey Joseph Boulos) on May 6 and July 17, 2002.[46] Iran denied responsibility for the attack[47] but did not file any response to the claims of the families.[46] On December 18, 2002, Judge Royce C. Lamberth entered defaults against defendants in both cases.[46]
On May 30, 2003, Lamberth found Iran legally responsible for providing Hezbollah with financial and logistical support that helped them carry out the attack.[46][48] Lamberth concluded that the court had personal jurisdiction over the defendants under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, that Hezbollah was formed under the auspices of the Iranian government and was completely reliant on Iran in 1983, and that Hezbollah carried out the attack in conjunction with MOIS agents.[46]
On September 7, 2007, Lamberth awarded $2,656,944,877 to the plaintiffs. The judgment was divided up among the victims; the largest award was $12 million to Larry Gerlach, who became a quadriplegic as a result of a broken neck he suffered in the attack.[49]
The attorney for the families of the victims uncovered some new information, including a National Security Agency (NSA) intercept of a message sent from Iranian intelligence headquarters in Tehran to Hojjat ol-eslam Ali-Akbar Mohtashemi, the Iranian ambassador in Damascus. As it was paraphrased by presiding U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, "The message directed the Iranian ambassador to contact Hussein Musawi, the leader of the terrorist group Islamic Amal, and to instruct him ... 'to take a spectacular action against the United States Marines.'"[50] Musawi's Islamic Amal was a breakaway faction of the Amal Movement and an autonomous part of embryonic Hezbollah.[51]
In July 2012, federal Judge Royce Lamberth ordered Iran to pay more than $813m in damages and interest to the families of the 241 US soldiers that were killed, writing in a ruling that Tehran had to be "punished to the fullest extent legally possible... Iran is racking up quite a bill from its sponsorship of terrorism."[52][53][54][55]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beiru ... ainst_IranIran also co-operated in setting up the government of President Karzai.
The Iranian and Afghan governments have continued to maintain friendly relations. Hamid Karzai has made a number of trips to Tehran.
At the same time, there have been many reports that Iran is playing both sides in Afghanistan, just as it is alleged to have done in Iraq: on the one hand providing support for the government, on the other hand providing support for insurgents and war-lords, both in order to weaken the Afghan government and to tie down the forces of America and its allies.
A report on the Reuters news agency quotes warnings about the power of Iran from a former governor of Nimroz province, the Afghan province bordering Iran and Afghanistan.
Ghulam Dastgir Azaad said he frequently investigated attacks in which Iran was implicated, either in supplying weapons or training the insurgents.
"We [in this province] share 90km of border with Iran, which Iran easily exploits to send, regularly, explosive devices and weapons into Afghanistan," the former governor told the news agency.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11621525Breakthrough in Tribunal Investigation: New Evidence Points to Hezbollah in Hariri [President of Lebanon] Murder
http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor ... 26412.html
...
The whereabouts of the two Beirut groups of mobile phone users coincided again and again, and they were sometimes located near the site of the attack. The romantic attachment of one of the terrorists led the cyber-detectives directly to one of the main suspects. He committed the unbelievable indiscretion of calling his girlfriend from one of the "hot" phones. It only happened once, but it was enough to identify the man. He is believed to be Abd al-Majid Ghamlush, from the town of Rumin, a Hezbollah member who had completed a training course in Iran. Ghamlush was also identified as the buyer of the mobile phones. He has since disappeared, and perhaps is no longer alive.
Ghamlush's recklessness led investigators to the man they now suspect was the mastermind of the terrorist attack: Hajj Salim, 45. A southern Lebanese from Nabatiyah, Salim is considered to be the commander of the "military" wing of Hezbollah and lives in South Beirut, a **** stronghold. Salim's secret "Special Operational Unit" reports directly to Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, 48.
A Lebanese demonstrator holds a portrait of ex-prime minister Rafiq Hariri and a sign reading "justice" in Arabic.
Imad Mughniyah, one of the world's most wanted terrorists, ran the unit until Feb. 12, 2008, when he was killed in an attack in Damascus, presumably by Israeli intelligence. Since then, Salim has largely assumed the duties of his notorious predecessor, with Mughniyah's brother-in-law, Mustafa Badr al-Din, serving as his deputy. The two men report only to their superior, and to General Kassim Sulaimani, their contact in Tehran. The Iranians, the principal financiers of the military Lebanese "Party of God," have repressed the Syrians' influence.
Do you want me to keep going or is that enough?
Play time is over.