UFC on FX 8: Belfort v. Rockhold (May 18)

Moderator: lilfishi22

User avatar
SDM
RealGM
Posts: 19,555
And1: 954
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
 

UFC on FX 8: Belfort v. Rockhold (May 18) 

Post#1 » by SDM » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:39 pm

http://www.mmamania.com/2013/2/13/39844 ... brazil-mma" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Gold Chain
RealGM
Posts: 10,136
And1: 161
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#2 » by Gold Chain » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:16 pm

I like it.

Although, because it is Vitor in Brazil, he'll be juiced to the gills again......

Luke is in tough here.
HUGE for his career if he can beat him. (Hope he does)
User avatar
SDM
RealGM
Posts: 19,555
And1: 954
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#3 » by SDM » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:44 pm

Unfortunately, I'm going to take the guy on TRT.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#4 » by REDDzone » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:47 pm

TRT Vitor will smash Rockhold due to mma math.

Bisping claims to have babied Rockhold, Vitor dispatched Bisping with relative ease. Can't miss analysis.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Gold Chain
RealGM
Posts: 10,136
And1: 161
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#5 » by Gold Chain » Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:57 pm

HAHA!

Bisping's striking is rated highly by he himself.

Luke did beat Jacare, so he can beat quality guys, but TRT Belfort with his hawk is a tall glass of buttermilk.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#6 » by REDDzone » Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:46 pm

Its going to be hard to deny TRT Belfort another title shot if he knocks off guys like Bisping and Rockhold on the regular.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Gold Chain
RealGM
Posts: 10,136
And1: 161
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#7 » by Gold Chain » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:06 pm

Yeah, but there's going to be a similar result in potential title fight.

Anderson is so much smarter than this guy, he'll have Vitor beat by the weigh-ins again.

Jesus needs to up Vitor's testy-ostery-roney naturally.

Anyways, how does Rockhold win this?
User avatar
SDM
RealGM
Posts: 19,555
And1: 954
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#8 » by SDM » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:13 pm

He doesn't, basically. It'll look exactly like the Bisping fight when Rockhold feels the power of a man with two dozen artificial testicles.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#9 » by REDDzone » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:20 pm

Its not possible for a surfer dude to beat an old lion.

Much less a young dinosaur.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
kdawg32086
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,916
And1: 1,086
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Clark County, Washington
         

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#10 » by kdawg32086 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:41 pm

This should be an interesting fight. I'm guessing the winner is probably at the front of the line for a title shot. Vitor's only losses since 2007 are against current reigning champions and Rockhold, as the SF champ should get a title shot if they were planning on giving it to Bisping if he beat Vitor.
Image
Thank you triplemke23 for the sig.
User avatar
CPT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,320
And1: 2,793
Joined: Jan 21, 2002
Location: Osaka/Seoul/Toronto
         

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#11 » by CPT » Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:01 am

Vitor is getting dangerously close to being that guy who just picks off contenders but can't really challenge for the belt.
User avatar
cowboyronnie
RealGM
Posts: 30,236
And1: 1,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2004

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#12 » by cowboyronnie » Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:36 am

no interest in watching Chea-tor against anyone not themselves on TRT, it's not a fair fight.

anyone know, he can come in with those crazy levels on the testosterone spectrum that the commissions allow? 6x the average or whatever they are? but he can do it while having metabolites from whatever's he's taken too. just completely defeats that 6x allowance, which only exists in case there might be natural freaks out there. in fact, it exists at 6x cos there's just no possible way it can be hit naturally, hence the presumption of guilt if it's ever touched even if no direct sign of pharmaceuticals.
Hi love, bye love, I will miss my love.
User avatar
cowboyronnie
RealGM
Posts: 30,236
And1: 1,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2004

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#13 » by cowboyronnie » Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:37 am

I wonder if American AC's won't grant the exemption cos he's failed a test within the States (Cali, I believe). Hence Brazil and Canada in his past three. Or coincidence, just as possible.
Hi love, bye love, I will miss my love.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#14 » by REDDzone » Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:15 pm

I swear, back when everyone was in a trt frenzy over Chael, I remember the doctor guy who used to come on Mauro's podcast all the time say that the natural ratio for the test/epitest was 1:1 and the highest you'd practically ever see is like 1.2 to 1. Why they go 6 I'll never understand. From what that dude was saying (Dr. Benjamin?), it would be essentially never that you would see someone get up to 2:1.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
SDM
RealGM
Posts: 19,555
And1: 954
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
 

Re: UFC on FX 8: Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#15 » by SDM » Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:59 pm

User avatar
cowboyronnie
RealGM
Posts: 30,236
And1: 1,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2004

Re: UFC In Brazil (date, venue TBA): Belfort v. Rockhold 

Post#16 » by cowboyronnie » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:05 pm

REDDzone wrote:I swear, back when everyone was in a trt frenzy over Chael, I remember the doctor guy who used to come on Mauro's podcast all the time say that the natural ratio for the test/epitest was 1:1 and the highest you'd practically ever see is like 1.2 to 1. Why they go 6 I'll never understand. From what that dude was saying (Dr. Benjamin?), it would be essentially never that you would see someone get up to 2:1.


yeah, its high. but its then safe to punish the dudes even if you dont detect anthing synthetic in their blood. if it were 3:1, the guy's lawyer might have an argument or whatever. 4:1, 5:1...we're already probably high enough to punish. but Im only a doctor when it comes to the 3 dwarf hamsters in my living room.
Hi love, bye love, I will miss my love.
User avatar
Gold Chain
RealGM
Posts: 10,136
And1: 161
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
 

Re: UFC on FX 8: Belfort v. Rockhold (May 18) 

Post#17 » by Gold Chain » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:19 pm

Oh man, great fight.

This one will be a finish.

These are both scary dudes/
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,869
And1: 8,379
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC on FX 8: Belfort v. Rockhold (May 18) 

Post#18 » by Bernman » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:59 pm

I too think TRT Vitor has this. Rockhold is overrated with the questionable Jacare win, he's got questionable striking defense, not quite the wrestling to take TRT Vitor down, and TRT Vitor also has the bigger power.

Is TRT Vitor becoming the face of FX? They had him headlining the previous FX and it scored record viewership.

SDM wrote:http://www.mmamania.com/2013/2/15/3992332/constantinos-philippou-vs-jacare-souza-ufc-on-fx-8-may-18-brazil-mma

Philippou/Jacare added.


Oh hot damn!

I got Jacare as the much better fighter, but it's not a good match-up for him. Theoretically Costa could keep it on the feet and possibly outbox him.

REDDzone wrote:I swear, back when everyone was in a trt frenzy over Chael, I remember the doctor guy who used to come on Mauro's podcast all the time say that the natural ratio for the test/epitest was 1:1 and the highest you'd practically ever see is like 1.2 to 1. Why they go 6 I'll never understand. From what that dude was saying (Dr. Benjamin?), it would be essentially never that you would see someone get up to 2:1.


You don't know why it would be allowed.....that's adorable.

If you listen to Dana he loves TRT. That's all you need to know.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC on FX 8: Belfort v. Rockhold (May 18) 

Post#19 » by REDDzone » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:12 pm

Even if they allow it, the ratio is too much.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,869
And1: 8,379
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC on FX 8: Belfort v. Rockhold (May 18) 

Post#20 » by Bernman » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:31 pm

He'll get away with as much as he can, just like Bud Selig.

RZ, I miss you on the Bellator threads.

Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts