Det-GSW-NOL
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Det-GSW-NOL
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Det-GSW-NOL
For shitz and gigs
GSW out: David Lee, Harrison Barnes
GSW in: Eric Gordon
NOL out: Eric Gordon
NOL in: Greg Monroe, Corey Magette
Detroit in: David Lee, Harrison Barnes
Detroit Out: Greg Monroe , Corey Magette
Why for GSW?
They have been linked to EG per Wiretap. Curry, Gordon, Thompson combo be vicious. Also instead of taking on additional salary they shed David Lee's contract enabling them to use Money to go after guys like Smith.
Why for NOL?
I don't think NOL would be looking to take on David Lee's contract, other wise Detroit would just be cut out of the deal. However they get a nice piece next to Davis for the future as well as a huge expiring enabling them to build around there new front court players.
Why for Detroit?
While i am still a huge moose believer the purpose of turning him into Lee is a matter of ready now. Joe D has until next season to get us into the playoffs. Though David lee is overpaid, he at least brings some consistency to the PF position and is also compliment to Drummond. While i would like to think we'd could get more for moose, Harrison Barnes is a really nice piece to grow with Knight and Dre.
GSW out: David Lee, Harrison Barnes
GSW in: Eric Gordon
NOL out: Eric Gordon
NOL in: Greg Monroe, Corey Magette
Detroit in: David Lee, Harrison Barnes
Detroit Out: Greg Monroe , Corey Magette
Why for GSW?
They have been linked to EG per Wiretap. Curry, Gordon, Thompson combo be vicious. Also instead of taking on additional salary they shed David Lee's contract enabling them to use Money to go after guys like Smith.
Why for NOL?
I don't think NOL would be looking to take on David Lee's contract, other wise Detroit would just be cut out of the deal. However they get a nice piece next to Davis for the future as well as a huge expiring enabling them to build around there new front court players.
Why for Detroit?
While i am still a huge moose believer the purpose of turning him into Lee is a matter of ready now. Joe D has until next season to get us into the playoffs. Though David lee is overpaid, he at least brings some consistency to the PF position and is also compliment to Drummond. While i would like to think we'd could get more for moose, Harrison Barnes is a really nice piece to grow with Knight and Dre.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,520
- And1: 52
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
Bullwinkle for David Lee??? I'll pass, even if Barnes is included in the trade...
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
Jodi wrote:Bullwinkle for David Lee??? I'll pass, even if Barnes is included in the trade...
got some fool calling me a homer on the Trading board saying Lee >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>moose. lol honestly Lee's been playing well but i think he's playing well above his head.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
- ElectricMayhem
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,242
- And1: 11,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Kobe-Osaka
-
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
GSW gets the worst of the trade. They're rightfully high on Barnes and lose Lee as well for Gordon?
Tom Gores' Securus faced a class action lawsuit in 2024. The company engaged in a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with county jails in Michigan which banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
ElectricMayhem wrote:GSW gets the worst of the trade. They're rightfully high on Barnes and lose Lee as well for Gordon?
Per wiretap, GS is interested in Gordon. they are not going to get Gordon for just expiring,. They'll have to give up one of curry, barnes, and thompson. If i'm NOL, Thompson isn't anyone i'm high on, Curry is untouchable and Barnes is a nice piece but unproven.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
- pistontr
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,010
- And1: 275
- Joined: Mar 10, 2012
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
Blkbrd671 wrote:For **** and gigs
GSW out: David Lee, Harrison Barnes
GSW in: Eric Gordon
NOL out: Eric Gordon
NOL in: Greg Monroe, Corey Magette
Detroit in: David Lee, Harrison Barnes
Detroit Out: Greg Monroe , Corey Magette
Why for GSW?
They have been linked to EG per Wiretap. Curry, Gordon, Thompson combo be vicious. Also instead of taking on additional salary they shed David Lee's contract enabling them to use Money to go after guys like Smith.
Why for NOL?
I don't think NOL would be looking to take on David Lee's contract, other wise Detroit would just be cut out of the deal. However they get a nice piece next to Davis for the future as well as a huge expiring enabling them to build around there new front court players.
Why for Detroit?
While i am still a huge moose believer the purpose of turning him into Lee is a matter of ready now. Joe D has until next season to get us into the playoffs. Though David lee is overpaid, he at least brings some consistency to the PF position and is also compliment to Drummond. While i would like to think we'd could get more for moose, Harrison Barnes is a really nice piece to grow with Knight and Dre.
gsw do not need a guard. they have already one of the bset backcourt in the leauge.
Sorry for my poor english
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,001
- And1: 12,482
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
GSW has Klay Thompson who is getting better. I don't see them giving up on their best player in my opinion for an injury prone Gordon when they don't need wings.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,869
- And1: 3,460
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
Interesting trade. My initial thoughts are never trade Drummond or Monroe, but we do get two starters back. I don't think GSW does this, but would have to at least consider it.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
- Scout Taron
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,843
- And1: 393
- Joined: Jun 29, 2010
-
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
David Lee> EGor
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,261
- And1: 424
- Joined: Jun 24, 2011
- Location: Turkey
-
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
Scout Taron wrote:David Lee> EGor
This. He's the closest guy to 20/10. He's efficient, great passer, durable. Plus they have Klay Thompson on a rookie contract.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,554
- And1: 22
- Joined: Apr 04, 2012
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
Lmao Warriors gets screwed hard.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,113
- And1: 3,441
- Joined: Apr 19, 2010
- Location: Michigan
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
OOO wrote:Lmao Warriors gets screwed hard.
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
BadMofoPimp wrote:GSW has Klay Thompson who is getting better. I don't see them giving up on their best player in my opinion for an injury prone Gordon when they don't need wings.
Per Wiretap
The Dallas Mavericks, Houston Rockets and Golden State Warriors are amongst the teams that have expressed interest in Gordon
What exactly is GS going to offer NOL that's going to entice them?
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
-
- Junior
- Posts: 328
- And1: 54
- Joined: Jan 16, 2013
Re: Det-GSW-NOL
Because whatever the wiretap has to say is High Word
The trade doesn't even make sense for the Warriors. Who would they start at PF if they trade their 20/10 man? It's not like they're a losing team, they are doing perfectly fine. They might be willing to trade Barnes or Thompson + filler for Gordon, but there's no way in hell they're giving up Lee. The fact that you think Monroe is worth Lee + Barnes would cause you to be called a homer, and I can't blame them.
Monroe is a good player, but not worth how much you think he is.
Also, I doubt we would even be needed in a trade involving Gordon and the Warriors
The trade doesn't even make sense for the Warriors. Who would they start at PF if they trade their 20/10 man? It's not like they're a losing team, they are doing perfectly fine. They might be willing to trade Barnes or Thompson + filler for Gordon, but there's no way in hell they're giving up Lee. The fact that you think Monroe is worth Lee + Barnes would cause you to be called a homer, and I can't blame them.
Monroe is a good player, but not worth how much you think he is.
Also, I doubt we would even be needed in a trade involving Gordon and the Warriors