G35 wrote:People want to down Kobe for not having more MVP's but you should look at Kobe's competition during the 00's. These are the MVP winners:
Shaq
KG
Duncan
Dirk
Nash
Lebron
Or you can look at this year by year to get a better gauge of Kobe's MVP competition.
2000-2002: 2000 is clearly Shaq by a mile with Alonzo and Duncan fighting for the second spot. 2001 was Duncan in the regular season and Shaq in the playoffs. Kobe had perhaps his best playoff run that year but there was very little argument for him over either Shaq or Duncan unless you put a ton of stock over Kobe's performance against the Spurs. 2002 is again between Shaq and Duncan as the best player in the league. All Kobe was competing was the title as the best wing in the league with T-Mac and AI.
2003: Clearly Duncan's year. Was amazing throughout the entire playoffs and was perhaps the starting point of the Spurs becoming a model franchise. With Robinson's impending retirement and Manu/Parker not being a star yet the Spurs could have made drastic changes just like other franchises when they are not seeing progress. Winning a title that year really saved the Spurs. They didn't tear down and rebuild from scratch around Duncan, they didn't try to dump Parker for Kidd, and they are able to win two more titles afterwards because they decide to go with what they have. Kobe was again never in serious contention for MVP as he's still fighting with T-Mac as the best wing in the league.
2004-05: Two of Kobe's prime years wasted by bad decisions both on and off the court.
2006: The fabled season. Some argued this was Kobe's best season and is deserving of MVP because he won the scoring title while making the playoffs with an unimpressive team, but what's lost in Kobe's scoring frenzy are two other superstars that also put up great numbers.
Iverson: 33/7.4/54% TS
Lebron: 31/7/6/57% TS
Those two are never mentioned in the MVP race despite putting up great numbers themselves. In fact, Iverson's numbers were eerily similar albeit inferior to Kobe's. If Kobe's numbers are what's putting him in the MVP race then why does no Kobe supporter think AI should be in the conversation? If you are going to use team success then to exclude AI from the MVP talk then what about Lebron? He put up great but different numbers from Kobe and he also almost upset a superior team.
Aside from the dubious exclusion of those two players Kobe also posted an eFG and TS that is nearly identical to the league average. It's impressive on an individual standpoint for someone to handle as much shooting volume as Kobe, but when he's converting points at the same rate as the entire league combined how much impact does he really have on the team? Should we assume that it's greater than someone like Dirk and Wade who plays with more reserve on a winning team?
2007: Somewhat a reverse of the 2006 season as far as the team goes. They started off playing well and things got south as injuries pile up. For the second half of the season Kobe went back to 2006 mode. Melo, Lebron, and Dirk all had individually impressive seasons, and Dirk would have been the uncontested MVP of the year had he not stunk up the joint in the playoffs.
2008: This was probably the most interesting year as far as MVP talk goes. 05-07 was kind of a void in that there wasn't a player that stood out in both the regular seasons and the playoffs above the rest where you can say one is unanimously the best player in the game. Heck, Nash wouldn't have won two MVPs if there was a player who was impressive at both the individual and the team level. This year is where we have four candidates in Kobe, KG, CP3 and Lebron that present a strong case. In terms of team success, it's KG by a mile. His adjusted +/- is off the chart and he helped Boston to the biggest turnaround in league history. In terms of individual success, both Lebron and CP3 have better arguments over Kobe. Lebron posted 30/8/7 while winning the scoring title while CP3 took the assist and the steals title. Kobe is in the middle in that he's individually more impressive than KG and have more team success than Lebron and CP3.
2009-2010: Those were Lebron's years. The only argument Kobe has over Lebron is rings, and if that's the way you want to go you would also have to revisit previous years and say Wade is better than Kobe in 06, Duncan in 07, and KG in 08.
So in reality, Kobe had a 3 year period where he had a shot at the MVP, and two of those years were weak enough that Nash got the award simply based on his team success. Then you have 2001-03 and 09-10 where Kobe is in the discussion but no one has a serious case to give him a 1st place vote.