...almost too quiet....
........oh, I see...Higgins is asleep at the wheel again....waiting for someone to call....

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
CHA_77_Bobcats wrote:Yeah we really need another soft big man.
I'm thinking about the "value" we'd have to give up to LA, and I'd much rather just try to grab Demarcus Cousins with that kind of value. At least he's on a rookie deal and not a max contract.
Bassman wrote:
While I am sure Cousins is not available, I would love to pull an "MJ at the gaming table" move for him. Push all the chips in and get this guy. By that I mean deal Biz, Hendo and 2 - 1st round picks to get him (the Portland pick and the Detroit pick). If that didn't do it, send them MKG and the Portland pick + filler. Cousins may have some edgy moments, but his talent is undeniable. Pair a quality SG from this year's draft with him, along with our other young ones, and we might have something here.
Kemba
Rookie SG
Taylor
Mullens
Cousins
doc.end wrote:I was just wondering...
Brooklyn out: Humphries (and Blatche)
Charlotte out: Gordon
Chicago out: Boozer
Golden State out (need to cut about 800k on salar to avoid luxury tax): Biedrins, Landry
Toronto out: Bargnani
Brooklyn in: Boozer (let's say Smith is not available to them anymore)
Charlotte in: Humphries
Chicago in: Gordon, Landry (assuming they deal Hamilton to solve luxury tax danger)
Golden State in: Bargnani (13M out, 10M in)
Toronto in: Biedrins(shorter contract), Blatche(to get someone to play)
Where am I off? Who needs more? Who needs less? Who can't do that because of X? Some players may be seen as negative value by some and a positive by others. I tried to stay away from picks as some teams are not free to trade them (yet).
pickIBL wrote:LOL It's gonna happen bang bang before the deadline
Amare & Copeland coming in Tyrus & Ben
Granger coming in for a package around Diop & Reggie Williams and your lower first.
Fred Williamson wrote:pickIBL wrote:LOL It's gonna happen bang bang before the deadline
Amare & Copeland coming in Tyrus & Ben
Granger coming in for a package around Diop & Reggie Williams and your lower first.
Kemba
Hendo
Granger
Amare
Mullens/Biz
doesn't look too bad tbh but it would ruin the plan
pickIBL wrote:LOL It's gonna happen bang bang before the deadline
Amare & Copeland coming in Tyrus & Ben
Granger coming in for a package around Diop & Reggie Williams and your lower first.
JMAC3 wrote:pickIBL wrote:
but i will let you keep playing 2k GM or whatever.
Sik Infant wrote:doc.end wrote:I was just wondering...
Brooklyn out: Humphries (and Blatche)
Charlotte out: Gordon
Chicago out: Boozer
Golden State out (need to cut about 800k on salar to avoid luxury tax): Biedrins, Landry
Toronto out: Bargnani
Brooklyn in: Boozer (let's say Smith is not available to them anymore)
Charlotte in: Humphries
Chicago in: Gordon, Landry (assuming they deal Hamilton to solve luxury tax danger)
Golden State in: Bargnani (13M out, 10M in)
Toronto in: Biedrins(shorter contract), Blatche(to get someone to play)
Where am I off? Who needs more? Who needs less? Who can't do that because of X? Some players may be seen as negative value by some and a positive by others. I tried to stay away from picks as some teams are not free to trade them (yet).
Boozer is hot trash and no way do they get BG+Landry, other than that this is a great trade imo.
How about we add Diop(Who goes to Chicago for lux tax purposes) and Chicago adds Rip Hamilton(Who goes to Brooklyn?)
Brooklyn out: Humphries (and Blatche)
Charlotte out: Gordon (and Diop)
Chicago out: Boozer (and Rip)
Golden State out (need to cut about 800k on salar to avoid luxury tax): Biedrins, Landry
Toronto out: Bargnani
Brooklyn in: Boozer and Hamilton
Charlotte in: Humphries and Landry
Chicago in: Gordon and Diop
Golden State in: Bargnani (13M out, 10M in)
Toronto in: Biedrins(shorter contract), Blatche(to get someone to play)
Chicago may have to add another filler if they close to the tax.
hotrod wrote:@rick_bonnell: Dunlap had couple of 1-on-1s with players regarding trade deadline: "To not acknowledge it is probably not the smartest thing to do.''
Couple? BG and who else. GH and TT?
BlackOutBobcat wrote:I didn't catch that, hotrod. Could you repeat that for me?
EDIT: aww now my joke doesn't make sense