Redick, Ayon & Smith to the Bucks for Harris, Lamb and Udrih

madbucky · Post #221 » by **madbucky** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:33 pm

terrible trade

Bucksfans1and2 · Post #222 » by **Bucksfans1and2** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:33 pm

Chapter29 wrote:
Bucksfan28 wrote:
DrugBust wrote:Harris couldn't get off the bench and Lamb is a 12th man. For that an expiring contract the Bucks got themselves a good NBA starter and his bird rights.

Now, like I said, if he walks the deal looks a lot worse.

Ellis should be Gooden'd now. He can't be allowed to play anything more than spot backup minutes.

This x1000.

The logic I've heard regarding Brooks (which I also agree with) is how he can't get off the bench on an average BKN team and is losing minutes to the likes of Stackhouse/Bogans.

The same applies to Harris. If he really was as good as everyone here wants to believe then he would've been getting some burn, somehow. Now Redick doesn't turn us in to a championship contender but the Bucks got the best player in the trade.

Yup.

For 28 games. If we wanted him that bad we could've got him during the offseason.

emunney · Post #223 » by **emunney** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:33 pm

Sanders, Dalembert, Henson, Ersan, Udoh, Ayon, Przybilla, Gooden, LRMAM. Fine work. On a full roster, we have six players who aren't bigs.

trwi7 · Post #224 » by **trwi7** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:33 pm

kid idioteque wrote:Band still intact! Disaster averted!

Can I use this on twitter?

Fort Minor · Post #225 » by **Fort Minor** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:33 pm

This deal wasn't the worst (didn't have to give up a 1st, which I valued more than Harris), but it makes little sense without Ellis leaving. Unless they expect Monta to walk and to re-sign Redick. But even then, ehhh...

JayMKE · Post #226 » by **JayMKE** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:34 pm

we traded Tobes, Lamb, and Udrih for a 6th man that will walk in the offseason if we don't give him $40 million dollars

you can't make this stuff up

Siefer · Post #227 » by **Siefer** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:34 pm

trwi7 wrote:I think the funniest part of this deal will be Ellis still playing 35+ minutes per game.

That'll be the salt in the wound. Ellis will still start, and Redick will play 20 minutes a night off of the bench.

Skin · Post #228 » by **Skin** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:35 pm

JustinCredible wrote:
Skin wrote:Magic fan here...

What'd you like most about Tobias Harris?

He was great on the bench. Not sure how good he is off the bench though cuz he never got up.

Yeah, too much fuss about this it seems. You guys could've given up a 2nd rounder in 2050 and been in the same angry mood cuz you gave up "assets".

LOL. You don't even know what you gave up!

Thunder Muscle · Post #229 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:35 pm

Yeah it seems like this deal was meant to coordinate with the deal with the Hawks.

I like getting Redick. I don't necessarly love dealing with Harris. But I have no idea how a Redick/Ellis combo is going to work. Ellis will NOT take well to being a 6th man. I'm guessing he'll see more PG minutes.

trwi7 · Post #230 » by **trwi7** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:35 pm

https://twitter.com/FakeJohnHammond/sta ... 2948366336

DanoMac · Post #231 » by **DanoMac** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:35 pm

Incase anyone missed it...

I just texted Hammond "We getting Josh Smith?"

He texted me back "Good ?"

smauss · Post #232 » by **smauss** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:36 pm

emunney wrote:Sanders, Dalembert, Henson, Ersan, Udoh, Ayon, Przybilla, Gooden, LRMAM. Fine work. On a full roster, we have six players who aren't bigs.

Down from last year?

jakecronus8 · Post #233 » by **jakecronus8** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:36 pm

Dream of the 9 seed still alive!!!!

Fort Minor · Post #234 » by **Fort Minor** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:36 pm

BuckPack wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:They saved us from our selfs. Any asset going out for Smith would've been just as bad as it was for Redick.

No way, it almost certainly would've involved Ellis which is automatically a win. Redick + Smith - Ellis would've been a great day for us.

Smith in, but who the Hawks would have gotten is not right.

Why get Redick, but keep Ellis?

Turk Nowitzki · Post #235 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:36 pm

Monta better at least be the 6th man after this. If we bring Redick off the bench I will cry.

JayMKE · Post #236 » by **JayMKE** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:37 pm

DanoMac wrote:Incase anyone missed it...

I just texted Hammond "We getting Josh Smith?"

He texted me back "Good ?"

he's drunk, he meant Drew Gooden

Ill-yasova · Post #237 » by **Ill-yasova** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:37 pm

DanoMac wrote:Incase anyone missed it...

I just texted Hammond "We getting Josh Smith?"

He texted me back "Good ?"

He thought you were telling him.

Bucksfans1and2 · Post #238 » by **Bucksfans1and2** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:37 pm

Sanders/Dalembert/Ayon/Pryzbilla
Ersan/Henson/Udoh/Gooden
LRMAM/Dunleavy
Redick/Ellis/Daniels
Jennings/Smith

WTF?

Fort Minor · Post #239 » by **Fort Minor** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:37 pm

DanoMac wrote:Incase anyone missed it...

I just texted Hammond "We getting Josh Smith?"

He texted me back "Good ?"

Wait, when? We're still in it?

ampd · Post #240 » by **ampd** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:38 pm

europa wrote:
Howard Mass wrote:
The real question is how much you like Harris and Lamb.

Lamb was pretty awful. Harris has a ton of offensive potential and is already a strong inside player. He should've been getting a lot more minutes with the Bucks than he received. I think the Magic are going to really love him if they give him a legitimate chance.

This trade will turn out to be amazingly more hilarious if Reddick bolts as a free agent and Ellis opts in for the last year of his contract.

I f'ing hate this team.

The sad part is that it doesn't get any better if Redick doesn't bolt and we pay him 4/40