Red Larrivee wrote:DanTown8587 wrote:Meh. I don't think the Bulls give two **** about what Reggie Rose thinks and he's saying the Bulls should get better players. Um, does anyone think the Bulls aren't trying to do that?
I think there's a good bit who question what they're doing, especially if it's a man who has a ton of influence on Rose. The Bulls should give all the **** in the world about what Reggie Rose thinks. He's the leader of Rose's camp.
No, this is like Cleveland cow tailing to Maverick Carter. If Derrick feels this way, I'd tell him that's not how this is handled. Look, Derrick can pissed that the Bulls aren't putting "enough" around him, but the only move that Rose could openly criticize for lack of talent would be letting Gordon, Asik or Korver walk. The rest have been replaced by superior players.
This is an unfair criticism of a team that is in the thick of a playoff race WITHOUT Rose. The Bulls aren't scrapping to make the playoffs with a healthy Rose. They're a high 40s win team without him.
Look, I'll say it: Derrick Rose playing garbage against Miami certainly didn't help. He's not blameless. He played ineffective the first time, was injured the next year. I'm not blaming him, but to sit here and basically say the same thing that you would say about KG's Minnesota teams is false.
All because he's Rose's brother/manager.