DarkXaero wrote:Love is a star...
Two different thoughts in two seperate parts of the post. One is if Love forces his way, the other is a general package getting a good player.
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
DarkXaero wrote:Love is a star...
PetroNet wrote:N Ireland Nets wrote:Not to mention we now will make a 1st round selection who could be a good asset moving forward. Shengelia might turn into a good player next season, Taylor as well. A lot of things can happen now but we're going to have more assets next season than we had this season.
great, we get to make a late selection in one of the weakest drafts in the past 15 years. Taylor and Shengelia arent going to get any playing time. even if they have what it takes to get better ti wont happen here or get showcased here. That first round pick is pretty worthless, we would be wise to trade it for a future protected first rounder and a future second rounder if we can.Also don't dismiss how valuable Hump now is to teams with the new lux tax kicking in. 1st round picks due to being on cheap contracts have real value and with us being willing to take on bad contracts to get the right player, we're one of the only teams not making cuts due to the tax.
We're in a very good position going forward.
Humps contract will be more valuable. the issue is next year their arent any good expiring bigs like smith/milsap to use his value on.

MrDollarBills wrote:I guess King couldn't find another team to straight up bamboozle him this year in the same fashion that Portland did to him last year.


N Ireland Nets wrote:At next years deadline Love would be in exactly the same position as Utah were with Williams when they traded him. Love would have 1 & a bit years left on his deal and nobody is giving up loads of top assets for a season and a bit rental, its too risky.
So it would need to be a team he would re-sign with and I'm not saying we'd get him at all but we'd have a chance at least. Love has a player option in his final year which he isn't taking, he's gone the year before that. It's not as outlandish as many people believe for Love to end up with us even though it would take quite a few things to go in our favor.
N Ireland Nets wrote:1st point is complete rubbish. Right now the mocks have someone like Dario Saric going around our pick currently and I know he is a huge talent with through the roof potential. To say a player picked from 20 onwards in the first round is worthless is a joke to me. This is turning out to be a very good draft from what I've seen with a hell of alot of depth to it, so having a later pick is actually good to me.
Also how do you know whatever new coach that we bring in won't play Taylor more or Toko turns into a legit player. So many factors that can change and become assets. Taylor could very well be our backup next season and see alot more minutes.
2nd point about Hump is 100% correct but the lux tax kicking in is going to have an impact on decisions teams make to make sure they don't go near it. Players are going to become available that people thought we're untouchable.
CalamityX12 wrote:Love is overrated....
**** **** this sh*t from our FO & coaches... get the Euros playing!
SpearsNBAYahoo: Knicks have agreed to sign veteran forward Kenyon Martin to a 10-day contract, a source told Yahoo! Sports.


N Ireland Nets wrote:SpearsNBAYahoo: Knicks have agreed to sign veteran forward Kenyon Martin to a 10-day contract, a source told Yahoo! Sports.
I bet some Nets fans go mental over this as well


PetroNet wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:Love is overrated....
**** **** this sh*t from our FO & coaches... get the Euros playing!
even if love ISNT overrated, how does he really make us contenders? we need defense... elite defense. not kevin love.
PetroNet wrote:So pissed we didnt make a trade, even a minor one. there are so many minor trades that could have helped us short term in a big way. i mean:
- We STILL have no backup SG
- We STILL have a logjam at PF
- We STILL have the worst defense of any playoff team
- We STILL dont have a 3 point specialist
- We STILL dont have any second round picks movign forward
- We STILL have little at backup wing, and an injury to wallace would leave us very bare
The Ben Gordon trade would have cured 2-3 of those issues, wouldnt require an asset, and we retain a large expiring. how do you not do that?
Crawford was had for a second rounder, we could have given them brooks and probably gotten 2 second rounders or maybe a second and a reserve SG/Wing.
I'm fine we didint get smith, we simply didnt have the assets. but nto filling any of our MAJOR areas of need, even with a minor deal is just a poor job. We are not getting out of the first round with this team.
bobbyc wrote:Next summer has zach randolph written all over it.
cs hauser wrote:Jersey Generals wrote:A true expiring, plus a good pick (using my Humphries idea as a cursor), plus three first round picks, plus Euro stashes can get the job done for a very good player. I mean, it's basically what got the Knicks Carmelo Anthony...
Uh... no.
The Knicks got a bargain on Carmelo because they had all the leverage. Carmelo was becoming a free agent. He indicated he wanted to go to NYC. The Knicks had the cap room to sign him. That resulted in the Nuggets being forced to deal him rather than lose him to NYK for nothing.
The Nets have no cap room in the foreseeable future. They have absolutely no leverage whatsoever. They will not get a star player for scraps if they have no leverage. The best they can get for Hump's expiring contract will be an overpaid veteran who has zero trade value. (i.e. if that veteran had positive trade value, then his team would've been able to trade him for more than just an expiring).
Look around the NBA. See how many overpaid players have long term contracts at $12 million salaries. The ones who are considered amnesty candidates. Those are precisely the kind of players the Nets can expect to receive in exchange for Humph next season. They're certainly not going to get a Carmelo out of Humph.
The only way the Nets can get a "star" player is if one of their young prospects develops into a legitimate asset. But then again... if MarShon or Teletovic become stars, why would the Nets even trade them away at all?

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
MrDollarBills wrote:Hump's contract will become an asset in a few months. Might as well suck it up and wait, we'll be a one and done 1st rd team though. I can't see us beating anyone with the atrocious coaching and no PFs
624 wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Hump's contract will become an asset in a few months. Might as well suck it up and wait, we'll be a one and done 1st rd team though. I can't see us beating anyone with the atrocious coaching and no PFs
You can't see us beating any of the 6 other non-Miami teams we are either tied with or beating in the season series?

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.