Image ImageImage Image

Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,946
And1: 37,384
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#821 » by DuckIII » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:44 am

KingCuban wrote:How dare your son rip away the bull that surrounds this issue and hit the core of it so easily, whilst us adults mildly argue semantics.


He's not old enough to know that a pathetically large portion of the American public is sycophantic.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
GetBuLLish
General Manager
Posts: 9,044
And1: 2,644
Joined: Jan 14, 2009

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#822 » by GetBuLLish » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:44 am

coldfish wrote:
MJ's image was that he was a hyper-competitive dick. Calling out his teammates was actually in character for MJ.

I don't think people can separate this. I'm not saying what Reggie said was factually incorrect. What I'm saying is that Reggie's words were very poorly chosen and bad timing. Unprofessional, childish and unproductive.

Again, look at your MJ examples. MJ didn't have his brother complain publicly. He bitched out teammates right to their faces and I believe he had multiple very angry confrontations with both Krause and Jerry. If that is what Rose wants, go for it.


Your complaints, then, seem far less severe than how you are portraying them. If all you're mad about was the method of the message delivery, your anger seems very out of proportion.

If the message is important, then what matters most was that it was sent.
nitetrain8603
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 1,832
Joined: May 30, 2003
         

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#823 » by nitetrain8603 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:45 am

SpinninHouse wrote:What is Reggie suggesting we should have done? Dwight wasn't willing to come here. Which star was available? Maybe we could have swapped Noah for Harden. OKC wasn't taking anybody else on our team for him. That wouldn't have put us over the top. Our front court wold be a joke.

What options did we have? True, the Hinrich signing was horrible. But we weren't signing anybody for $3M that would put us over the top.

Yes, we need to make a move. But making a dumb trade like Cleveland did to please Lebron or Orlando to please Dwight would have catastrophic long term consequences.


Though I'm not a fan of Harden, Noah or Deng plus a pick for Harden wouldn't have been terrible. Or trading Asik for Mayo. Or simply signing Mayo over Hinrich.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,820
And1: 38,218
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#824 » by coldfish » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:47 am

BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:I'm not sure that I'm correctly interpreting you first post & I want to be fair in my response. The underlined portion is why I quoted you & why I showed the players that are surrounding the (possible) two superstars that you mentioned. I now see that Lebron & KD are the players that you were talking about in your first post.

From the list that you provided & your second post, it seems that we are on the same page. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we are both saying that D-Rose needs a legit #2 alongside of him, like all of those mentioned title-winning superstars had. If he doesn't get one, he won't win a title in Chicago.

It's also the same thing that Reggie Rose is saying.


No, what I am saying is that Rose needs a legit #1 beside him if you want to win the superstar way. Rose is the Pippen to Jordan or Wade to Lebron or Kobe to Shaq. Outside of that, you need to have a ton of talent like Detroit or Boston and even then you are probably one and done.

So, yes, Rose needs more talent around him and behind the scenes its fine for Reggie to say that. To say it publicly AFTER the Bulls paid the luxury tax and when they can't do anything is idiotic. To then threaten to sit out, call out management and trash teammates publicly is beyond (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

You are treating Reggie Rose like a poster. If he was, I wouldn't bash him. He is the professional representative of Derrick Rose giving quotes to the main stream press. Under that capacity, he is a FOOL.
User avatar
The Kane
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,616
And1: 644
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
Location: South Side
   

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#825 » by The Kane » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:48 am

BullsGate wrote:
dice wrote:reggie should tell his bro to take a pay cut. then he can talk

besides, if the bulls were winning much more this year they wouldn't even NEED derrick to return

Why don't you take a pay cut?


Exactly. Why the hell should D. Rose have to take a pay cut from his hardly earned salary for the FO to make some moves? Roses salary isn't the problem. Overpaying role players is the problem. Miami are the only recent champs to have their best player take a pay cut, and that's only because there were three superstars coming together. The FO should be able to get a championship team around him regardless
"This game has always been, and will always be about buckets."

- Bill Russell
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,820
And1: 38,218
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#826 » by coldfish » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:49 am

GetBuLLish wrote:
coldfish wrote:
MJ's image was that he was a hyper-competitive dick. Calling out his teammates was actually in character for MJ.

I don't think people can separate this. I'm not saying what Reggie said was factually incorrect. What I'm saying is that Reggie's words were very poorly chosen and bad timing. Unprofessional, childish and unproductive.

Again, look at your MJ examples. MJ didn't have his brother complain publicly. He bitched out teammates right to their faces and I believe he had multiple very angry confrontations with both Krause and Jerry. If that is what Rose wants, go for it.


Your complaints, then, seem far less severe than how you are portraying them. If all you're mad about was the method of the message delivery, your anger seems very out of proportion.

If the message is important, then what matters most was that it was sent.


I have lived through the disappointments of 2000, 2006 and 2010. I do think that public image matters. A lot. Yes, the Bulls need to do things to dispel their image but they need to have their star help them do it.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#827 » by Shill » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:50 am

coldfish wrote:
BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:I'm not sure that I'm correctly interpreting you first post & I want to be fair in my response. The underlined portion is why I quoted you & why I showed the players that are surrounding the (possible) two superstars that you mentioned. I now see that Lebron & KD are the players that you were talking about in your first post.

From the list that you provided & your second post, it seems that we are on the same page. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we are both saying that D-Rose needs a legit #2 alongside of him, like all of those mentioned title-winning superstars had. If he doesn't get one, he won't win a title in Chicago.

It's also the same thing that Reggie Rose is saying.


No, what I am saying is that Rose needs a legit #1 beside him if you want to win the superstar way. Rose is the Pippen to Jordan or Wade to Lebron or Kobe to Shaq. Outside of that, you need to have a ton of talent like Detroit or Boston and even then you are probably one and done.

So, yes, Rose needs more talent around him and behind the scenes its fine for Reggie to say that. To say it publicly AFTER the Bulls paid the luxury tax and when they can't do anything is idiotic. To then threaten to sit out, call out management and trash teammates publicly is beyond (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

You are treating Reggie Rose like a poster. If he was, I wouldn't bash him. He is the professional representative of Derrick Rose giving quotes to the main stream press. Under that capacity, he is a FOOL.




But it seems like you're excoriating Derrick for his brother's comments.

Even if Derrick vented these concerns to his brother, he's allowed to think whatever he wants.

Unless Derrick explicitly told his brother to air this, Derrick gets a pass from me.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
User avatar
babblin-on
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,465
And1: 219
Joined: Nov 05, 2007

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#828 » by babblin-on » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:50 am

BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:I'm not sure that I'm correctly interpreting you first post & I want to be fair in my response. The underlined portion is why I quoted you & why I showed the players that are surrounding the (possible) two superstars that you mentioned. I now see that Lebron & KD are the players that you were talking about in your first post.

From the list that you provided & your second post, it seems that we are on the same page. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we are both saying that D-Rose needs a legit #2 alongside of him, like all of those mentioned title-winning superstars had. If he doesn't get one, he won't win a title in Chicago.

It's also the same thing that Reggie Rose is saying.


Nope, you're not on the same page; coldfish has insisted time and again that if Rose needs a true #2 then he isn't a true superstar, because real superstars, like Lebron, don't need a true #2 to to win a title.
I can accept failure, everyone fails at something. But I can't accept not trying.

- Michael Jordan
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,946
And1: 37,384
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#829 » by DuckIII » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:51 am

GetBuLLish wrote:
DuckIII wrote:You keep calling everyone who disagrees with your opinions a joke.


When people use this opportunity to bring up Rose's SATs (like you have) or say that "This is Dwight territory if not worse (Dwight was always PC in public) and Rose would have done less damage by raping someone like Kobe did" (like ColdFish did), then I will call those opinions jokes.



Admittedly, I've never been comfortable with Rose stealing someone's scholarship. So I'll give you that. But it illustrates the degree to which his hero worship has always been out of bounds with Bulls fans. That act was indefensible. Yet it is defended in STRONG language to this day, like you calling it a joke to even mention it in the context of an event that raises questions about Rose's selfishness. Sorry, but its a pertinent point.

Regardless, every time you've cited it, you've failed to note the additional paragraphs of that post that gave it context as to why I even mentioned it at all.

Irrational overreactions are jokes to me.


Sometimes it sucks to be a moderator.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
kingkirk
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 80,406
And1: 23,765
Joined: Jan 24, 2004
 

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#830 » by kingkirk » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:52 am

Bullflip wrote:
Would have traded Noah for Harden, then kept Asik.


So we can be Houston 2.0?
Bowl_O_Bulls
Ballboy
Posts: 29
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#831 » by Bowl_O_Bulls » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:52 am

This thread is like crack to me..
The Bulls 2013 offense. Making Monta Ellis look efficient.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#832 » by Shill » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:53 am

babblin-on wrote:
BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:I'm not sure that I'm correctly interpreting you first post & I want to be fair in my response. The underlined portion is why I quoted you & why I showed the players that are surrounding the (possible) two superstars that you mentioned. I now see that Lebron & KD are the players that you were talking about in your first post.

From the list that you provided & your second post, it seems that we are on the same page. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we are both saying that D-Rose needs a legit #2 alongside of him, like all of those mentioned title-winning superstars had. If he doesn't get one, he won't win a title in Chicago.

It's also the same thing that Reggie Rose is saying.


Nope, you're not on the same page; coldfish has insisted time and again that if Rose needs a true #2 then he isn't a true superstar, because real superstars, like Lebron, don't need a true #2 to to win a title.



They don't?

How many championships did LeBron win in Cleveland?
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#833 » by RedBulls23 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:54 am

Derrick has no number two on this team and that is a fact. Coldfish getting mad at Rose and stating other wise doesn't change that.

The fact that even guys like Jordan and Lebron couldn't win it without another top 10 player is foolish to say that they would be able to win it with a cast like the Bulls have put around Rose going up against a super team like Miami.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
Former Roy
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 150
Joined: May 17, 2012

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#834 » by Former Roy » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:54 am

KingCuban wrote:
Bullflip wrote:
Would have traded Noah for Harden, then kept Asik.


So we can be Houston 2.0?


Houston's got an MVP!?
ChicagoStrong
General Manager
Posts: 9,284
And1: 2,360
Joined: Dec 04, 2011

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#835 » by ChicagoStrong » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:55 am

Bowl_O_Bulls wrote:This thread is like crack to me..


I tried to kick... but that **** just be callin' me man, it be callin' me, man... I just got to go to it!
BIGGIEsmalls 23
Banned User
Posts: 13,283
And1: 810
Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Location: REALITY
   

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#836 » by BIGGIEsmalls 23 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:56 am

pb-ceo wrote:derrick you would have had a championship in 2011 if only you had played like one in the playoffs.

pb-ceo wrote:John Paxson just twiittered: Hey Derrick, learn to shoot the ball like Kyrie Irving and then we'll talk okay?

Stop trolling so damn much, man.
User avatar
Rerisen
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 105,369
And1: 25,052
Joined: Nov 23, 2003

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#837 » by Rerisen » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:56 am

Before saying Rose needs to be a #2 himself, lets get him a real #2 first. It will be cheaper and easier. He's never had one and we were pretty competitive with Miami with Keith Bogans, possibly the worst starting SG in the league.

I believe there is a difference between regular season play and playoffs for sure, but the Bulls underlying metrics as a team, as measured by regular season performance, is not in any way consistent with suggesting the Bulls actually need a Durant or LeBron level player added to this team. That is just wild overreaction, seems to me as backlash vs Rose's brother's comments, to demean him.
GetBuLLish
General Manager
Posts: 9,044
And1: 2,644
Joined: Jan 14, 2009

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#838 » by GetBuLLish » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:56 am

coldfish wrote:I have lived through the disappointments of 2000, 2006 and 2010. I do think that public image matters. A lot. Yes, the Bulls need to do things to dispel their image but they need to have their star help them do it.


So one article from his brother outweighs four years, including a ROY, 2 All-Stars, and an MVP? Got it.

babblin-on wrote:Nope, you're not on the same page; coldfish has insisted time and again that if Rose needs a true #2 then he isn't a true superstar, because real superstars, like Lebron, don't need a true #2 to to win a title.


I agree with Coldfish on a lot of things, but he's trolling with that stuff.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#839 » by Shill » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:58 am

DuckIII wrote:
GetBuLLish wrote:
DuckIII wrote:You keep calling everyone who disagrees with your opinions a joke.


When people use this opportunity to bring up Rose's SATs (like you have) or say that "This is Dwight territory if not worse (Dwight was always PC in public) and Rose would have done less damage by raping someone like Kobe did" (like ColdFish did), then I will call those opinions jokes.



Admittedly, I've never been comfortable with Rose stealing someone's scholarship. So I'll give you that. But it illustrates the degree to which his hero worship has always been out of bounds with Bulls fans. That act was indefensible. Yet it is defended in STRONG language to this day, like you calling it a joke to even mention it in the context of an event that raises questions about Rose's selfishness. Sorry, but its a pertinent point.

Regardless, every time you've cited it, you've failed to note the additional paragraphs of that post that gave it context as to why I even mentioned it at all.

Irrational overreactions are jokes to me.


Sometimes it sucks to be a moderator.




I'm probably misremembering, but I don't remember your taking a hardline stance on the SAT matter at the time. I thought you were even okay with it because it highlighted the hypocrisy and fecklessness of the NCAA as an institution.

Again, I'm probably misremembring. It may have been someone else.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
GetBuLLish
General Manager
Posts: 9,044
And1: 2,644
Joined: Jan 14, 2009

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#840 » by GetBuLLish » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:00 am

DuckIII wrote:
Admittedly, I've never been comfortable with Rose stealing someone's scholarship. So I'll give you that. But it illustrates the degree to which his hero worship has always been out of bounds with Bulls fans. That act was indefensible. Yet it is defended in STRONG language to this day, like you calling it a joke to even mention it in the context of an event that raises questions about Rose's selfishness. Sorry, but its a pertinent point.

Regardless, every time you've cited it, you've failed to note the additional paragraphs of that post that gave it context as to why I even mentioned it at all.


I've failed to note the additional paragraphs because his SAT is so completely irrelevant that bringing it up shows the irrationality that Reggie's comments have created.

Almost every single star in this league has demanded help, demanded to be traded, or flat out left. And their SATs had nothing to do with it, either.

Irrational overreactions are jokes to me.


Sometimes it sucks to be a moderator.


I don't doubt that.

Return to Chicago Bulls