Are the Jazz dismal after timeouts?

[StocktonShorts]

82games published this awesome look at how teams did out of timeouts a while back and the Jazz (under Sloan) were 4th in version 1 of the list and 1st in version 2:

http://www.82games.com/timeouts.htm

http://www.82games.com/timeouts2.htm

If that study was done for Ty Corbin where would the Jazz be? At the bottom or just near the bottom?

[Soul Patch]

Yeah. Corbin isn't great with the x's and I'd it seems like. We still run some of Sloan's and Phil's inbounds plays so maybe just kinda near the bottom. I really miss having a coach that could draw up plays in close games.

[Neon Black]

Anyone actually have stats to offer? Or just speculation?

[StocktonShorts]

Anyone actually have stats to offer? Or just speculation?

I'm tempted to go mine the game logs for the data; I'm just scared of how much work it'll be.

[Neon Black]

Anyone actually have stats to offer? Or just speculation?

I'm tempted to go mine the game logs for the data; I'm just scared of how much work it'll be.

Yeah - I searched for every combination of words and couldn't come up with anything that I didn't have to pay for. That would be a lot of work...you'd have to do it for more teams than just the Jazz to get any real perspective.

[countrybama24]

The eye test tells me yes. The real stat is comparing the change in FG% from a teams average to a timeout (ideally, holding for the time left in the game). I don't think absolute post-TO FG% tells the whole story.

But anyways, I'm going with yes.

[Nate505]

Almost as dismal as they are during the start of the 1st and 3rd quarters.

Now why would they suck during the beginning of those quarters?!?!?