Regarding avatars
Regarding avatars
- Von Oswald
- Junior
- Posts: 498
- And1: 363
- Joined: Dec 14, 2009
Regarding avatars
Hi, I tried to put a gif in my avatar... it wasn't an animation, just gif extension, but I got the message that I need a jpg. I convert it into a JPG and says it's too big (90 x 90). And that's the thing I don't understand, how it is possible for many users to use a huge big gif without resizing? If I click in "show image" in one of those, it shows a animated gif 200 x 200 (for example) with 1MB of size. Why are some users able to do that kind of strange magic?
Re: Regarding avatars
- Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,374
- And1: 16,305
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Von,
What site were you trying to host it at?
For your other questions, I have forwarded this to someone who could better answer your question and hope to have an answer soon.
What site were you trying to host it at?
For your other questions, I have forwarded this to someone who could better answer your question and hope to have an answer soon.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)


Re: Regarding avatars
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,813
- And1: 37,037
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Regarding avatars
- Von Oswald
- Junior
- Posts: 498
- And1: 363
- Joined: Dec 14, 2009
Re: Regarding avatars
Howard Mass wrote:Von,
What site were you trying to host it at?
For your other questions, I have forwarded this to someone who could better answer your question and hope to have an answer soon.
Thanks
It is hosted on imgur, which is a permitted host. It's a stupid image, http://i.imgur.com/qEYOMUys.jpg (jpg version), 12kb of size... so I don't know why I stumble upon these restrictions when many users have juggernauts in their avatars.
Re: Regarding avatars
- Bertrob
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,394
- And1: 8,823
- Joined: Sep 08, 2011
- Location: Boognish
Re: Regarding avatars
i put it as mine and it worked
Re: Regarding avatars
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,813
- And1: 37,037
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Von Oswald wrote:Howard Mass wrote:Von,
What site were you trying to host it at?
For your other questions, I have forwarded this to someone who could better answer your question and hope to have an answer soon.
Thanks
It is hosted on imgur, which is a permitted host. It's a stupid image, http://i.imgur.com/qEYOMUys.jpg (jpg version), 12kb of size... so I don't know why I stumble upon these restrictions when many users have juggernauts in their avatars.
Can you link the original picture?

Re: Regarding avatars
- Stannis
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,568
- And1: 12,955
- Joined: Dec 05, 2011
- Location: Game 1, 2025 ECF
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Von Oswald wrote:Hi, I tried to put a gif in my avatar... it wasn't an animation, just gif extension, but I got the message that I need a jpg. I convert it into a JPG and says it's too big (90 x 90). And that's the thing I don't understand, how it is possible for many users to use a huge big gif without resizing? If I click in "show image" in one of those, it shows a animated gif 200 x 200 (for example) with 1MB of size. Why are some users able to do that kind of strange magic?
I had a similar issue with my sigs.
Use tinypic.com. No other image hosting site works for me.
Re: Regarding avatars
- Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,374
- And1: 16,305
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Ahh!
Our Avatar Limit is 80 by 80.
This is why it did not load.
Hope this helps.
Our Avatar Limit is 80 by 80.
This is why it did not load.
Hope this helps.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)


Re: Regarding avatars
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,813
- And1: 37,037
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Not true, Howard. I've put avatars in there that are bigger than that and it's worked fine. Not sure what he's doing wrong, he needs to link the original picture so we can help more.

Re: Regarding avatars
- Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,374
- And1: 16,305
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Well, we are going to correct this if this is true.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)


Re: Regarding avatars
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,813
- And1: 37,037
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Regarding avatars
- Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,374
- And1: 16,305
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Re: Regarding avatars
- Von Oswald
- Junior
- Posts: 498
- And1: 363
- Joined: Dec 14, 2009
Re: Regarding avatars
Let's see, original pic is http://i.imgur.com/qEYOMUy.jpg (I deleted the .gif some days ago, but it's the same thing).
Following Shpati21's advice, I tried to upload a huge animated gif to tinypic (1mb size). I got the same restrictions messages.
Following Shpati21's advice, I tried to upload a huge animated gif to tinypic (1mb size). I got the same restrictions messages.
Re: Regarding avatars
- Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,374
- And1: 16,305
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Von Oswald,
Maybe try another pic and see what happens.
Maybe try another pic and see what happens.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)


Re: Regarding avatars
- Jake0890
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,983
- And1: 807
- Joined: Jul 12, 2012
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
-
Re: Regarding avatars
Personally, I think it'd be nice if RealGM increased the avatar size. 80x80 is really tiny, and I think it helps users personalize their accounts. Especially for the people who have GIFs of dunks, plays, etc., it becomes impossible to see what their avatar actually is.
Just a suggestion, albeit unrelated to the OP.
Just a suggestion, albeit unrelated to the OP.
Re: Regarding avatars
- Von Oswald
- Junior
- Posts: 498
- And1: 363
- Joined: Dec 14, 2009
Re: Regarding avatars
Ok, I found out the solution. This field: "Specify the width and height of the avatar, leave blank to attempt automatic verification.", it must be filled by putting 80 x 80, even if the avatar is higher than the permitted resolution. Then it will resize. A strange mechanism.
Kind of agree, 80 x 80 was OK for 2004, but nowadays with better bandwidth and high-res screens avatars could be bigger than that. 100 x 100 is the standard in many places.
Jake0890 wrote:Personally, I think it'd be nice if RealGM increased the avatar size. 80x80 is really tiny, and I think it helps users personalize their accounts. Especially for the people who have GIFs of dunks, plays, etc., it becomes impossible to see what their avatar actually is.
Just a suggestion, albeit unrelated to the OP.
Kind of agree, 80 x 80 was OK for 2004, but nowadays with better bandwidth and high-res screens avatars could be bigger than that. 100 x 100 is the standard in many places.
Re: Regarding avatars
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 9,881
- And1: 166
- Joined: Jan 10, 2013
Re: Regarding avatars
What happened to the avatar size? I changed it today and tried to change it back to my previous avatar that was 100 x 100 and it wouldn't let me do it...The 80x80 makes my current avatar look weird...
Re: Regarding avatars
- Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,374
- And1: 16,305
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Re: Regarding avatars
dreamchaser,
Are you able to do 100 by 100 now?
Are you able to do 100 by 100 now?
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)


Re: Regarding avatars
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 9,881
- And1: 166
- Joined: Jan 10, 2013
Re: Regarding avatars
Howard Mass wrote:dreamchaser,
Are you able to do 100 by 100 now?
Yep, working perfectly and thanks for asking....
Re: Regarding avatars
- Howard Mass
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66,374
- And1: 16,305
- Joined: Feb 20, 2001
- Location: Longwood, Florida
- Contact:
-
Return to Feedback and Suggestions