ImageImageImageImageImage

Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#381 » by stevemcqueen1 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 2:34 pm

CLIN wrote:^^^

I think you guys have now listed every PG in this class lol

If the wizards pick porter, it will be unanimously praised. I don't think i've seen anyone on here say anything bad about him. I think he'll be really solid in the pros.


Well I have. And I like the prospect. And if we picked him I would praise the pick. He's a terrific fit here and is a safe bet. This is not a good class IMO, and I'm thinking one of the smartest things we can do is just pick the guy we pretty much know is going to at least be a decent starter. We can't afford to strike out in the draft this year.

But I also think I'm more realistic about his upside than most. And I'm bummed out by the fact he's probably the best we can do with a likely top five pick. The top five of next year's class looks unbelievable and it hurts to think about this class compared to that one. The friggin one and done rule screwed us this year.
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#382 » by stevemcqueen1 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 3:11 pm

nate33 wrote:
stevemcqueen1 wrote:
AFM wrote:Wow. I need to watch more Burke. Kyrie and CP3?


I'm skeptical of those comparisons. Those guys didn't exactly fly under the radar. If Burke were in their class he would probably be the first overall pick this year. I don't see any places ranking him nearly that high. DX has him 16th in the class, NBAdraft.net has him going 17th.

You put too much faith in these draft sites, stevemcqueen. They are wrong all the time, particularly this early in the process. I suggest you pay close attention to the guys on this board, especially Dat2U, Ruzious, CCJ, Nivek and doclinkin. They're much better at evaluating talent than the guys at DX or nbadraft.net.

Chad Ford is worth paying attention to in June because he has sources that know what GM's are thinking. But right now, GM's aren't thinking anything about the draft so Chad Ford is only going on his personal opinions, which aren't that accurate.

But all that aside, the league in general has been consistently slow at recognizing new trends. A while ago, they missed the undersized PF boom that allowed guys like Boozer, Millsap and Love to radically outperform expectations. The latest trend is that being undersized at PG isn't the liability it once was. You don't need a 6-4 PG like Westbrook, Rondo or Wall. Little guys like Lowry, Lawson, Lillard and Collison are tearing the league up, and all were taken fairly late. DX may be right that Burke goes late, but they're wrong if they think he'll perform like a 16th pick.


I don't think NBAdraft.net is that great, but I think DX is excellent and I trust them. No offense to anyone here, but sources like DX and Chad Ford have access to so much more information. They see the prospects in person, they interview them, they talk to NBA scouts and agents and front office people, etc. They see international players play.

And what they typically do very well is rank the prospects in the class. They may not get the draft order exactly right, but sometimes they'll come pretty close within the lottery. And they nail who the lotto picks are. For example, last year DX correctly predicted 13 out of the 14 lottery picks & NBAdraft.net also got 13 out of 14.

I know Dat has said he tries to avoid the groupthink common to national draftnik sources but there is groupthink going on in the small community of this board. How else can you explain Trey Burke being a top 3-ish pick for so many in here when none of the national sources even have him in the lottery? I've seen how these things happen before. One or two very clever posters see something they like in him early on, they argue convincingly for him and people trust them and like their ideas from before. Others start looking for and seeing the same things too which reinforces the original idea. The bias of agreeing with and viewing things in the frame of reference of people you like and trust is unavoidable. The original idea gets repeated enough that it starts developing a ring of truth to it, then voila, an enclave develops a belief even if it veers away from the national perspective on the subject.

And I also think there is a climate of receptiveness and unusual positivity for a player like Burke because people are frustrated with Wall and our PG situation. I think people are overrating him and his skills in part because he is such a different PG from Wall. I saw a similar idea take shape in other places last season: "raw talent/high upside/athleticism = bad because Jan Vesely = bad." What we see with the Wizards heavily shapes our perspective on basketball in general.

I once saw an extremely clever poster on a Redskins board convince practically half the members there that Greg McElroy was going to be the next Tom Brady. That was literally his claim. Obviously that's a lot more extreme a situation, Burke is a clear first rounder and maybe a fringe lotto pick with most sources. But the groupthink dynamic was there. That's why I think it's valuable to come up for air every so often and check myself against what the rest of the world seems to be saying and thinking.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,689
And1: 5,273
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#383 » by tontoz » Sat Mar 9, 2013 4:12 pm

stevemcqueen1 wrote:And what they typically do very well is rank the prospects in the class. They may not get the draft order exactly right, but sometimes they'll come pretty close within the lottery. And they nail who the lotto picks are. For example, last year DX correctly predicted 13 out of the 14 lottery picks & NBAdraft.net also got 13 out of 14.



Those mocks change all the time leading up to the draft. If you look at their mocks in early march and then again days before the draft they are completely different.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
MikeTheKid
Head Coach
Posts: 6,827
And1: 4,373
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: DC/MD/VA
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#384 » by MikeTheKid » Sat Mar 9, 2013 5:06 pm

Ok guys whose on Otto Porter Watch right now? I actually had tix for the game but sold them because I wanted my dad to come with me and couldn't go.

BTW its sad a college team fills up the phone booth and the Wiz cant sell 3/4 of it.
User avatar
Earth2Ted
Junior
Posts: 408
And1: 58
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#385 » by Earth2Ted » Sat Mar 9, 2013 5:10 pm

nate33 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Wow, I'm in complete agreement with Chad Ford (1. Noel 2. Porter). I'm not sure what to think anymore, lol.

Interesting that his Mock Draft has the Wizards favoring Len as their #2 choice behind Noel. I wonder if that has changed in the past couple of weeks, or is Ford just saying who he would take as his 2nd choice behind Noel.


Ford's latest iteration of the lotto has us taking Noel if he's there, Porter if he's not, and Bennett if they're both off the board.

Len has dropped down to mid-lottery (7-9) and Zeller 1-2 spots behind him.

I'm always a sucker for the raw big with potential, so if I were Ernie I would probably pick Len if Noel were gone- warts and all.

Plus the 3 games I've actually seen him play include the Kentucky and the 2nd Duke game- so maybe I'm a little biased.
McGully Culkin
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 09, 2008

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#386 » by McGully Culkin » Sat Mar 9, 2013 8:09 pm

I want nothing to do with Alex Len...as a matter of fact, I think that Kelly Olynyk is the better player and will have the better career between the two.
Floater
Junior
Posts: 398
And1: 43
Joined: Mar 25, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#387 » by Floater » Sat Mar 9, 2013 8:52 pm

Check out Shabazz on CBS. Tie game with less than 4 to go, Shabazz is 8-17, 18 points, 4 boards and 0 assists so far. He's got that killer instinct too, we kinda need one of those players on offense. Unselfish players are nice and all but contending teams need at least one player that says, "Give me the damn ball, I'm gonna score."
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#388 » by stevemcqueen1 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 9:05 pm

Doug Gottlieb is insufferable. He's got an agenda against Shabazz too. He said earlier in the year that Kyle Anderson was going to be drafted higher than Shabazz and be a a better NBA player.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,585
And1: 23,053
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#389 » by nate33 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 9:13 pm

Earth2Ted wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Wow, I'm in complete agreement with Chad Ford (1. Noel 2. Porter). I'm not sure what to think anymore, lol.

Interesting that his Mock Draft has the Wizards favoring Len as their #2 choice behind Noel. I wonder if that has changed in the past couple of weeks, or is Ford just saying who he would take as his 2nd choice behind Noel.


Ford's latest iteration of the lotto has us taking Noel if he's there, Porter if he's not, and Bennett if they're both off the board.

Len has dropped down to mid-lottery (7-9) and Zeller 1-2 spots behind him.

I'm always a sucker for the raw big with potential, so if I were Ernie I would probably pick Len if Noel were gone- warts and all.

Plus the 3 games I've actually seen him play include the Kentucky and the 2nd Duke game- so maybe I'm a little biased.

Thanks for the update. Chad Ford's order is in perfect agreement with mine (assuming Bennett has at least an 8'-10" standing reach).
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,585
And1: 23,053
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#390 » by nate33 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 9:35 pm

Otto Porter just posted 10 points, 8 boards and 7 assists in a 55-possession game against Syracuse. A typical NBA game is about 92 possessions. Extrapolate Porter's performance over a typical NBA game, and his stat line would have looked more like: 17 points, 13 rebounds, 12 assists, 4 steals.
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#391 » by Severn Hoos » Sat Mar 9, 2013 10:02 pm

Ruzious wrote:And there are other little guards to watch - 5'11 sophomore Larson of Miami I think will start in the NBA some day.


Ruz, don't make me pull up the Whitman/Wittman thread on you. Barry Larkin was a Hall of Fame shortstop for the Cincinnati Reds, whose son, Shane Larkin, is a star player for the University of Miami basketball team.

Gary Larson is a cartoonist best known for The Far Side, and to the best of my knowledge is not related to the aforementioned Larkins.

But on the plus side, it gives me an excuse to post my favorite far Side cartoon ever, so I do thank you for that!

Image



And FWIW, I agree that young Shane will indeed start in the NBA one day. Quite the gunslinger, that one.
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#392 » by stevemcqueen1 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 11:06 pm

Floater wrote:Check out Shabazz on CBS. Tie game with less than 4 to go, Shabazz is 8-17, 18 points, 4 boards and 0 assists so far. He's got that killer instinct too, we kinda need one of those players on offense. Unselfish players are nice and all but contending teams need at least one player that says, "Give me the damn ball, I'm gonna score."


Yeah the best thing for me about him is his star mentality. I love his motor and his scoring instincts. He played well today and UCLA ended up having a pretty good season all things considered. He's good. He's going to be good in the NBA.
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#393 » by stevemcqueen1 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 11:12 pm

McGully Culkin wrote:I want nothing to do with Alex Len...as a matter of fact, I think that Kelly Olynyk is the better player and will have the better career between the two.


Len is passive. Content to just get lost in the flow. I don't think he has the mentality to be good. Maybe he just needs to grow up some but I'm at the point where I just wouldn't chance it.

I don't think Olynyk is going to be that good though. He's definitely got skills but he's just too slow. If he goes to a team like Indy where there are a lot of good players around him and he can just be one of the guys, I could see him being good. But if he goes somewhere crappy where he has to do a lot of scoring and opponents can game plan against him I don't think he's going to be that good.

He should go to Dallas. Be the next Dirk.
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#394 » by stevemcqueen1 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 11:19 pm

Isaiah Austin looks pretty competent. He looks like he has the right mentality to be a big man. He's just painfully skinny. He might end up being good when all is said and done.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#395 » by Ruzious » Sat Mar 9, 2013 11:37 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:
Ruzious wrote:And there are other little guards to watch - 5'11 sophomore Larson of Miami I think will start in the NBA some day.


Ruz, don't make me pull up the Whitman/Wittman thread on you. Barry Larkin was a Hall of Fame shortstop for the Cincinnati Reds, whose son, Shane Larkin, is a star player for the University of Miami basketball team.

Gary Larson is a cartoonist best known for The Far Side, and to the best of my knowledge is not related to the aforementioned Larkins.

But on the plus side, it gives me an excuse to post my favorite far Side cartoon ever, so I do thank you for that!

Image



And FWIW, I agree that young Shane will indeed start in the NBA one day. Quite the gunslinger, that one.

So, are you saying I'm guilty of grand larkiny?
Image

Btw, comic sections aren't any good nowadaze without Gary whathisname and Berkley Breathed.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#396 » by hands11 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 11:45 pm

Watching Baylor and KS right now.

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=330680239

Pierre Jackson 5-10 180 PG Very advanced skills. Leader.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketb ... re-jackson

He is another one of those little PG that puts up numbers.

I was very impressed. I would love to have this guy on my team. He knows how to play. All the little things. Angles. He can score on a 7 footer using his body as a shield.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#397 » by hands11 » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:02 am

Baylor Cory Jefferson 6-9 PF
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketb ... -jefferson


What a game from him against KS.

He has a pure NBA ready body.
Good rebounder and shoot blocker.

Todays game was his 3 ball coming out party. He has nice form.


I think we will see Cory in the NBA
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#398 » by Ruzious » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:41 am

hands11 wrote:Baylor Cory Jefferson 6-9 PF
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketb ... -jefferson


What a game from him against KS.

He has a pure NBA ready body.
Good rebounder and shoot blocker.

Todays game was his 3 ball coming out party. He has nice form.


I think we will see Cory in the NBA

Cory saw I put him in my top 30 and left Austin out. He's an under the radar physical specimen, but his age has to be an issue. I love how ESPN lists him at 210. 250 is more like it. Austin at 210 I'd buy.

Steve, DraftExpress.com still has Austin 11th in the draft. Do you believe they're in the ballbark? I don't.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#399 » by stevemcqueen1 » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:27 am

Ruzious wrote:Cory saw I put him in my top 30 and left Austin out. He's an under the radar physical specimen, but his age has to be an issue. I love how ESPN lists him at 210. 250 is more like it. Austin at 210 I'd buy.

Steve, DraftExpress.com still has Austin 11th in the draft. Do you believe they're in the ballbark? I don't.


I don't know TBH. That feels too high but I haven't been watching him all that much. He needs to go back to school. Seems like he should be a lotto pick off of just sheer tools but he's so skinny. Skinnier than Vesely. It'll be years before he's ready to play big minutes in the NBA. Maybe he goes in Byron Mullens range of about 20 or so? He's probably more talented than Mullens. He had a 20-20 game and put up a bunch of double doubles. And I think he's going to measure out as the tallest and longest player in the class.

I've cooled on both him and Len. Too inconsistent and physically underdeveloped. And Len's motor gets cold too often for my comfort level. I definitely do not want to strike out on this draft like 2011.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#400 » by Ruzious » Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:03 am

Agreed - Austin should go back to school. With Len, it depends. If there's a team willing to take him in the top 10, he should probably go.

One player who I think will stay but maybe should go is Gorgui Dieng. Beautiful game today. http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball ... 1303090314 I think he can be Okafor.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams

Return to Washington Wizards