GREAT win for this team. we really needed this, especially with the knicks winning. we have some very winnable games coming up, if we take card of business we could move up a couple games in the next week or two.
JJ needs to get back to form.
GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,461
- And1: 136
- Joined: Feb 27, 2012
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
- MrDollarBills
- RealGM
- Posts: 75,886
- And1: 52,627
- Joined: Feb 15, 2008
-
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
If I'm not mistaken, in the past two years when Hump was used as the 5, he was fairly efficient.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/
2025-2026 Indiana Pacers
C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/L. Kennard
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
2025-2026 Indiana Pacers
C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/L. Kennard
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
- Keith Van Horn
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,976
- And1: 1,217
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
-
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
I mean... why not try Blatche/Lopez with Mirza/Reggie on another unit?
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
MrDollarBills wrote:Great win against a team that I think will be one of the bottom 4 that will give us trouble in the playoffs.
Atlanta kind of sucks, they'll fall to the 7 if not 8 seed when it's all said and done IMHO.
They would be my top choice for a 1st round match up, I think we'd beat them in a rather lopsided 5 games.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,461
- And1: 136
- Joined: Feb 27, 2012
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
macgyver893 wrote:I mean... why not try Blatche/Lopez with Mirza/Reggie on another unit?
i dont think blatche is a great fit with the first unit. we already struggle with turnovers, not sure he would help. he also plays better as the focal point, which he can do on the second unit, not so much with the starters as he would be the 4th or 5th option.
i like him much better with the second unit, and next to reggie evans -- we started the year with that duo, and it was super effective.
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,092
- And1: 32
- Joined: Dec 10, 2012
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
macgyver893 wrote:I mean... why not try Blatche/Lopez with Mirza/Reggie on another unit?
THIS^
Evans can play a small ball C pretty well. I dont like Tele obviously, but if he is going to play then we should pair him with Evans and Wallace so we can make up for his lack of defense and rebounding and they dont compete with Mirza for shots.
It only makes sense to run plays for Mirza if he is in because that's all he brings to the table. Playing him with Lopez or Blatche doesnt make sense because they dominate the ball.
The point is that we need our two best bigs in the game as much as possible. Blatche isnt just starting material, he has all star level talent. Blatche is very good at stealing the ball defensively. Having Lopez behind him to block shots can let him play the passing lanes.
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
- SpeedyG
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,501
- And1: 1,310
- Joined: Mar 07, 2003
Re: GT#63: Nets @ ATL |3/9| 7:00pm | YES
MrDollarBills wrote:You can run both Lopez/Blatche up front, and use The Hump as the back up 5.
Because you take away what each of those two guys do well.
If you play Blatche inside, you take Lopez from where he's most effective.
If you play Blatche outside....well...you do not want him outside let's just put it that way.
Bless the man if his heart and his land are one ~ FrancisM, R.I.P. 3/6/09