Javale Mcgee for a bad contract and draft pick

youngthegiant · Post #1 » by **youngthegiant** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:41 am

Kosta koufos has been playing off the charts and Mcgee has only been playing about 10 minutes. It is a shame but Denver is in contending mode and they are winning without Mcgee. Denver will take a bad contract but will need to be getting draft pick, at the very least a lotto pick.

kobe_vs_jordan · Post #2 » by **kobe_vs_jordan** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:53 am

Perkins and Toronto pick comes to mind.

youngthegiant · Post #3 » by **youngthegiant** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:01 am

Wasabi_Johnson wrote:Perkins and Toronto pick comes to mind.

I would do that but I know it would come back to bite Denver in the Ass. Really hard to make a trade with Oklahoma, especially if it will make them better.

why22 · Post #4 » by **why22** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:11 am

Brandon Bass for McGee and Bostons 1st ??

Post #5 » by **The Rebel** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:03 am

Denver is not going to trade Mcgee for a bad contract and a 1st unless that 1st is early lotto pick.

Kazuya10 · Post #6 » by **Kazuya10** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:11 am

Boozer and the rights to Mirotic or however you spell it

ecuhus1981 · Post #7 » by **ecuhus1981** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:53 am

Okafor and the WAS1st?

ecuhus1981 · Post #8 » by **ecuhus1981** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:04 am

Seriously, though, Charlotte would be the perfect candidate. Not their own pick, obviously, but Portland's. I could see a Gordon/#13 for McGee deal going down on draft day. MJ loves knuckle-headed bigmen, and they could use a young, athletic 7-footer.

Colbinii · Post #9 » by **Colbinii** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:34 am

ecuhus1981 wrote:Seriously, though, Charlotte would be the perfect candidate. Not their own pick, obviously, but Portland's. I could see a Gordon/#13 for McGee deal going down on draft day. MJ loves knuckle-headed bigmen, and they could use a young, athletic 7-footer.

They wouldn't even have to add in the 13 if that was the deal.

youngthegiant · Post #10 » by **youngthegiant** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:35 am

ecuhus1981 wrote:Seriously, though, Charlotte would be the perfect candidate. Not their own pick, obviously, but Portland's. I could see a Gordon/#13 for McGee deal going down on draft day. MJ loves knuckle-headed bigmen, and they could use a young, athletic 7-footer.

I would do that, gives us a shooter(expiring contract) and a decent shot a getting a rotational player.

Ian Kognitow · Post #11 » by **Ian Kognitow** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:09 am

For whichever of Seattle or Sacramento fanbase ends up winning the right to energetically cheer the [SuperSonics]/Kings, their investment could be rewarded with the fun potential of a long-term DeMarcus Cousins/JaVale McGee [+Tyreke Evans/Jimmer Fredette?!] future that would only cost them their draft pick in a relatively-poor draft where the top prospects play positions they already have filled with their own major prospects? Yes, they would probably be ok with that.
-- Under the title premise, SAC/SEA would even be able to dump the Salmons's last guaranteed year on DEN in the deal, maybe even saving those nice Maloof fellows some cash as they move on to other ventures, depending on when the deal coudl happen.

DRK · Post #12 » by **DRK** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:52 pm

Gortat and Frye for McGee and Randolph.

Frye allows the Nuggets to spread the floor as a big off the bench, and Gortat is a 15/10 big man.

Prokys Nets · Post #13 » by **Prokys Nets** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:59 pm

Humphries & 2 1st round picks. If Denver works with out a deal with Billy King you could probably get even more assets. McGee in Brooklyn would be AMAZING.

RR9 · Post #14 » by **RR9** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:17 pm

Prokys Nets wrote:Humphries & 2 1st round picks. If Denver works with out a deal with Billy King you could probably get even more assets. McGee in Brooklyn would be AMAZING.

what would brook do? mcgee wouldn't be backup there too, would he? brook could slide to pf i suppose...dw/jj/gw/bl/jm starting 5 is pretty good

hcsilla · Post #15 » by **hcsilla** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:21 pm

DRK wrote:Gortat and Frye for McGee and Randolph.

Frye allows the Nuggets to spread the floor as a big off the bench, and Gortat is a 15/10 big man.

Very bad trade for the Suns since they don't need McGee's and Randolph's bad contracts.

BadWolf · Post #16 » by **BadWolf** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:59 pm

Isn't McGee a bad contract too?

Post #17 » by **The Rebel** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:08 pm

BadWolf wrote:Isn't McGee a bad contract too?

Mcgee is on a market value contract, and whether people like it or not the Nuggets are not going to dump him for a bad contract and a bad pick.

Post #18 » by **Young_Star11** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:23 pm

Would hardly call McGee a market-value contract, not when he hasn't had the opportunity to justify it.

Post #19 » by **The Rebel** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:33 pm

Young_Star11 wrote:Would hardly call McGee a market-value contract, not when he hasn't had the opportunity to justify it.

You may want to do some research on what young bigs who have shown the potential that McGee has get on th market, they all get at least 10 million a year, which is exactly what McGee is getting.

NashtyNas · Post #20 » by **NashtyNas** » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:45 pm

DRK wrote:Gortat and Frye for McGee and Randolph.

Frye allows the Nuggets to spread the floor as a big off the bench, and Gortat is a 15/10 big man.

Yep, came in here to offer this as well.

Also, if the Nuggs plan to stick with Koufous (and therefore don't want Gortat) I'd do Scola/Memphis 1st for McGee.