Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:My first impression: If they don't find the gun, and his boys lie well enough, Crittenton might walk. There is obviously not any video or hard evidence so far. He's had time to get his story together and to get his legal team together. In the judicial system, money talks and big money clients walk, especially when guilty.
Should be VERY interesting.
I wonder if Crittenton spoke before shooting (assuming he did it)? Did he do anything that could help others identify him positively as the shooter?
It looks like there is an eyewitness to the shooting:
[url]
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=a ... rdercharge[/url]
Stephens told The Associated Press he had never met Crittenton and wasn’t involved in the robbery.
“I didn’t know him at all,” said Stephens. “I didn’t know he existed and he didn’t know I existed. I hadn’t seen him a day in my life when he pulled up and started shooting.”
I think the case could hinge on whether the Arenas incident is admissible in court. If it is, then it severely weakens Crittenton's reputation as an upstanding citizen. If it isn't he might be able to be seen as more reliable, than the eyewitness. The prosecutors need to build an entire case, but it is a lot easier for a jury to convict if there is direct testimony rather than an entirely circumstantial case.
This also could end up being plea bargained. This is a high profile case, so the prosecutor especially does not want to lose this one. Crittenton could be facing life in prison or something very close. The victim being very sympathetic would really hurt him in sentencing if he got convicted.