JAZZ @ WARRIORS
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- seejaydeja
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,450
- And1: 53
- Joined: Nov 03, 2005
- Location: provo
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- seejaydeja
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,450
- And1: 53
- Joined: Nov 03, 2005
- Location: provo
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- Matt007b
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,791
- And1: 161
- Joined: Nov 10, 2008
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
huge game here.. hope mo brings his passing game and stays under control..
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 17,043
- And1: 8,319
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
no The Murp tonight as well.
the lakers lost. if we win we are back at 8th.
the lakers lost. if we win we are back at 8th.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- seejaydeja
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,450
- And1: 53
- Joined: Nov 03, 2005
- Location: provo
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 17,043
- And1: 8,319
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
Tinsanity!
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,064
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jan 09, 2013
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
We are in 8th since we win tie breaker...all we have to do is tie lakers to go to playoffs....I have the worst feeling in my gut that we lose 1 more game than Lakers and get like 42-40 and they get 43-39....
Golden State needs to win tonight to be considered playoff berth, with a lose tonight they are still open for losing playoff position.
Everyone is fighting right now, and were part of the group who lingered to long, and now have the final games decide our fates, which is never good to begin with.
Golden State needs to win tonight to be considered playoff berth, with a lose tonight they are still open for losing playoff position.
Everyone is fighting right now, and were part of the group who lingered to long, and now have the final games decide our fates, which is never good to begin with.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- seejaydeja
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,450
- And1: 53
- Joined: Nov 03, 2005
- Location: provo
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- seejaydeja
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,450
- And1: 53
- Joined: Nov 03, 2005
- Location: provo
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 17,043
- And1: 8,319
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
fun game to watch. very entertaining. and favors is showing some moves.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,064
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jan 09, 2013
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
We need to learn how to "not" be come back kids...Cause if we stop getting so behind we wouldn't need to catch up...
GSW is surprisingly a great team this year considering they were the clippers of the league last season.
Is it just me or have we gone nowhere since 1 year ago? I don't feel like we have gotten any better as a team...were the same old team who got 8th and was the only playoff team who probably wasn't "a playoff" team.
GSW is surprisingly a great team this year considering they were the clippers of the league last season.
Is it just me or have we gone nowhere since 1 year ago? I don't feel like we have gotten any better as a team...were the same old team who got 8th and was the only playoff team who probably wasn't "a playoff" team.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- seejaydeja
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,450
- And1: 53
- Joined: Nov 03, 2005
- Location: provo
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 17,043
- And1: 8,319
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
damn foye, that was one bad foul.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- StocktonShorts
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,386
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Jun 02, 2009
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
Randy's just tying to get his offense going by ratcheting up his defensive intensity.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
-
- Junior
- Posts: 372
- And1: 20
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
Right now we are on our way to the playoffs. If we win we will have a slight advantage. Lose and you know what. We are playing good team basketball. Curry is awesum. Stop Curry.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- StocktonShorts
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,386
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Jun 02, 2009
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
seejaydeja wrote:of course...can't escape the half without someone doing something dumb
You could say we consistently do dumb stuff.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- DiscoLives4ever
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,688
- And1: 2,757
- Joined: Oct 15, 2007
- Location: Saratoga Springs, UT
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- StocktonShorts
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,386
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Jun 02, 2009
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
DiscoLives4ever wrote:It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.
It irritates me that Foye thought it was a good idea to contest Carl Landry's desperation three at the buzzer.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- DiscoLives4ever
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,688
- And1: 2,757
- Joined: Oct 15, 2007
- Location: Saratoga Springs, UT
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
StocktonShorts wrote:DiscoLives4ever wrote:It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.
It irritates me that Foye thought it was a good idea to contest Carl Landry's desperation three at the buzzer.
I don't have a problem with it, considering it was a straight-away look with enough time to set and shoot.
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
- StocktonShorts
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,386
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Jun 02, 2009
-
Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS
DiscoLives4ever wrote:StocktonShorts wrote:DiscoLives4ever wrote:It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.
It irritates me that Foye thought it was a good idea to contest Carl Landry's desperation three at the buzzer.
I don't have a problem with it, considering it was a straight-away look with enough time to set and shoot.
But it was Carl Landry. He's 2 of 16 in his career from three.
