ImageImageImageImageImage

Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#781 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:04 am

You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
Benjammin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,496
And1: 641
Joined: Jan 18, 2003

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#782 » by Benjammin » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:08 am

If McLemore is head and shoulders better than anyone else at the second or third pick, okay, but the minutes right now aren't there for both Beal and McLemore. Neither Beal nor McLemore can guard or block out 3s and neither can handle the ball well enough to play the 1. Beal is at most 200 pounds and McLemore about 185; they have pretty good length for 2 guards but not 3s. It's great they have personal experience with one another but that doesn't mean they would mesh well on the professional level on the court.

With Burke, I can easily see him playing with either Wall or Beal effectively. 35 minutes for Wall, 32 minutes for Beal, and 29 minutes for Burke. With Beal Burke plays the point and with Wall he is a shooter on offense and guards the PG on defense. I think Wall wouldn't have huge trouble guarding backup 2s, for example.

Other than Noel, there's no one player in this draft who combines both talent and absolute position need. On the flip side, with the Wiz lack of depth almost any position one can see opportunity. If Porter is the pick it might cause them pause in re-signing Webster or being more open in moving Ariza or letting him become a FA in 2014.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#783 » by sfam » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:16 am

truwizfan4evr wrote:Would anyone want http://nbadraft.net/players/glenn-robinson-iii on wizards?

GRIII is going back to school.
Benjammin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,496
And1: 641
Joined: Jan 18, 2003

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#784 » by Benjammin » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:16 am

truwizfan4evr wrote:Would anyone want http://nbadraft.net/players/glenn-robinson-iii on wizards?


He's going back to Michigan so it's not happening this draft...
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,167
And1: 5,012
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#785 » by DCZards » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:34 am

Benjammin wrote:
With Burke, I can easily see him playing with either Wall or Beal effectively. 35 minutes for Wall, 32 minutes for Beal, and 29 minutes for Burke. With Beal Burke plays the point and with Wall he is a shooter on offense and guards the PG on defense. I think Wall wouldn't have huge trouble guarding backup 2s, for example.


I think Burke is pretty much strictly a PG. At his size i don't see him getting much run at SG or being able to score against much bigger SGs.
Benjammin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,496
And1: 641
Joined: Jan 18, 2003

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#786 » by Benjammin » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:37 am

DCZards wrote:
Benjammin wrote:
With Burke, I can easily see him playing with either Wall or Beal effectively. 35 minutes for Wall, 32 minutes for Beal, and 29 minutes for Burke. With Beal Burke plays the point and with Wall he is a shooter on offense and guards the PG on defense. I think Wall wouldn't have huge trouble guarding backup 2s, for example.


I think Burke is pretty much strictly a PG. At his size i don't see him getting much run at SG or being able to score against much bigger SGs.

I


I disagree. With Wall running the point, Burke would be off the ball and a lot of 2 guards would have a hard time keeping up with him. Plus, with the ball he could take some 2 guards off the dribble. Sort of Iverson-lite with Eric Snow.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,619
And1: 23,083
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#787 » by nate33 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:37 am

Benjammin wrote:If McLemore is head and shoulders better than anyone else at the second or third pick, okay, but the minutes right now aren't there for both Beal and McLemore. Neither Beal nor McLemore can guard or block out 3s and neither can handle the ball well enough to play the 1. Beal is at most 200 pounds and McLemore about 185; they have pretty good length for 2 guards but not 3s. It's great they have personal experience with one another but that doesn't mean they would mesh well on the professional level on the court.

With Burke, I can easily see him playing with either Wall or Beal effectively. 35 minutes for Wall, 32 minutes for Beal, and 29 minutes for Burke. With Beal Burke plays the point and with Wall he is a shooter on offense and guards the PG on defense. I think Wall wouldn't have huge trouble guarding backup 2s, for example.

Other than Noel, there's no one player in this draft who combines both talent and absolute position need. On the flip side, with the Wiz lack of depth almost any position one can see opportunity. If Porter is the pick it might cause them pause in re-signing Webster or being more open in moving Ariza or letting him become a FA in 2014.

Exactly, the big difference between Burke and McLemore is that there are 24-27 minutes available for Burke before we run into defensive matchup problems, whereas there is only 12-15 minutes available for McLemore before we run into defensive matchup problems.

Also, the way our team is constructed, PG play is critical. Everyone on the team except Nene (and perhaps Seraphin) is highly dependent on a PG feeding them the ball. No one else can create a shot. Without a good PG, we are dead in the water. The situation isn't the same at SG. We can plug in a scrub like Cartier Martin at backup SG and the world won't end.
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#788 » by rockymac52 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:11 am

Come the 4th quarter, Burke will be on the bench. However, we could probably play a Wall/Beal/McLemore back court in the 4th quarter. At least it's more likely to work, IMO.

I'm not saying your concerns about McLemore (or Beal) defending the opposing team's SF aren't legitimate. I'm just saying that Burke would present similar problems, even if you think Wall can defend SGs while Burke defends PGs for stretches. And again, you cannot ignore/forget that right now we have Webster defending SFs, and Webster is NOT a good defender, yet we somehow still have a top 10, arguably top 5 when healthy, defense. So even if McLemore (or Beal) doesn't have the ideal size to defend SFs, and they get taken advantage of on that end, guess what? It's probably not going to be any worse than it already is with Webster. And even if McLemore is small for defending SFs, at least he's shown the ability at the college level to be a dominant defender against SGs. More so than Beal or Wall were (PGs for Wall). That means he understands how to play good defense, and he's very much capable of it, so even if he's physically over-matched against SFs, he isn't going to suddenly magically forget how to play good defense, whereas guys like Webster simply aren't good at defense.

I don't see how you can justify taking Burke, while also dismissing the possibility of taking McLemore. You're keeping your blinders on, only looking for facts or arguments that will support your theory and ignoring any arguments that go against your theory. Come on, you guys are better than that.

Let's be real, the Wizards probably aren't drafting EITHER Burke or McLemore, because of these positional concerns. Maybe that's for the best, honestly. But maybe it's not. And I don't want to miss out on a star player because we pick for need instead of taking the best player available.
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#789 » by rockymac52 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:13 am

Not to mention the injury histories of Wall and Beal already. Obviously we have to build a roster based on the presumption of our main players being healthy, for the most part, but it's still worth considering. This way if one of them goes down, our team's playoff potential doesn't go out the door with it like it did this year. Let's have a good contingency plan at PG/SG for once instead of hoping for the best and subbing in the likes of Cartier Martin and Garrett Temple when an injury occurs.
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,851
And1: 3,573
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#790 » by Rafael122 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:27 am

Ford updated his mock again and he has us taking Bennett.

He's got Len going #4 to Cleveland, WOW.

I do wonder about Bennett though. He's got the asthma issue, and there might be a conditioning issue as well with him. Not sure if that's related to his asthma or he's just not a fan of the gym. Wittman is a hard ass, will it be a fit?

If Wall and Beal think that we need a stretch forward then Bennett may be the guy they are looking for. The problem is there's no telling which position he will play. Sounds like he has range, which puts him at the 3, and he's also undersized to be a 4. Just an interesting case here. I would say Bennett, McCollum and Oylnyk are my top 3 in terms of where we're picking. And there's always the chance we'll move up.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,619
And1: 23,083
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#791 » by nate33 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:57 am

Rafael122 wrote:Ford updated his mock again and he has us taking Bennett.

He's got Len going #4 to Cleveland, WOW.

I do wonder about Bennett though. He's got the asthma issue, and there might be a conditioning issue as well with him. Not sure if that's related to his asthma or he's just not a fan of the gym. Wittman is a hard ass, will it be a fit?

If Wall and Beal think that we need a stretch forward then Bennett may be the guy they are looking for. The problem is there's no telling which position he will play. Sounds like he has range, which puts him at the 3, and he's also undersized to be a 4. Just an interesting case here. I would say Bennett, McCollum and Oylnyk are my top 3 in terms of where we're picking. And there's always the chance we'll move up.

His mock also has Detroit with the #7 and us with the #8. Has that coin flip actually taken place yet?

It really might suck because in several scenarios, Detroit took Bennett one pick before us, sticking us with Shabazz.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,725
And1: 1,723
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#792 » by mhd » Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:57 am

Rafael122 wrote:Ford updated his mock again and he has us taking Bennett.

He's got Len going #4 to Cleveland, WOW.

I do wonder about Bennett though. He's got the asthma issue, and there might be a conditioning issue as well with him. Not sure if that's related to his asthma or he's just not a fan of the gym. Wittman is a hard ass, will it be a fit?

If Wall and Beal think that we need a stretch forward then Bennett may be the guy they are looking for. The problem is there's no telling which position he will play. Sounds like he has range, which puts him at the 3, and he's also undersized to be a 4. Just an interesting case here. I would say Bennett, McCollum and Oylnyk are my top 3 in terms of where we're picking. And there's always the chance we'll move up.



I can see that for sure. Assuming Noel, Porter, and Mclemore are 1-3, who does Cleveland take? Burke makes no sense b/c Waiters is a combo guard. Oladipo could be smart pick as a no-risk pick, but I think the Cavs shoot for the fences. Zeller played himself out of contention, Bennett is certainly in play, but is he a fit next to Thompson? Cavs take a home run swing on Len who can be brought along slowly behind Thompson and Varajeo.
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#793 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:38 am

Would love for the Wizards to take Norvel Pelle with one of our 2nd round picks. Kid reminds me of Deandre Jordan. Would be a decent big to have in the rotation a year or two from now.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#794 » by gambitx777 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:22 am

with all of the kids going back this is a great time for the wiz to steal another mid first, i would love to grab steven adams , man a steven adams bennett draft would be amazing !
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,829
And1: 7,963
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#795 » by montestewart » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:02 pm

TheKingOfVa360 wrote:Would love for the Wizards to take Norvel Pelle with one of our 2nd round picks. Kid reminds me of Deandre Jordan. Would be a decent big to have in the rotation a year or two from now.

Can't find anything on him, other than 6'10" and under 200 lbs. Was Jordan that skinny when he came in? Did Pelle even play?
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#796 » by fishercob » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:23 pm

Dat2U wrote:Trade the pick, trade the pick, trade the pick.

Ideally, trade the pick for a 2014 selection.

This draft reminds me so much of the 2000 draft with Kenyon Martin. Noel is the default number #1 pick who's injured and probably wouldn't be a #1 pick in most drafts. Nothing else is clear cut. I think the draft is filled with role players or guys that may develop into decent role players in 2/3 years. No stars. A lot of potential busts. Not a ton of starting quality talent either.

Best bet is to just trade the pick!


You need a trade partner, though. If this draft is indeed as bad as the 2000 draft, why would anyone give up anything of value for a mid lotto pick?

I don't know how you look at this draft as a whole and just dismiss it so summarily. And again, if you do, I don't see how you can expect much of value in return for our pick.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
thinker07
Junior
Posts: 360
And1: 75
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#797 » by thinker07 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:01 pm

Exit interview quotes from Wall, Martell, and Wittman all spoke to the need for more veterans NOT rookies. Could it be 2009 all over again???
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#798 » by jivelikenice » Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:05 pm

I doubt it. I think they'll be more patient this time around. If guys like Oladipo or Otto, mature prospects, are on the board they will probably use the pick. If thet aren't then they may have a contingency plan involving a trade in place. I wouldn't take what Wall/Webster/Wittman said that seriously. I think they probably don't want the main offseason upgrade to be a rookie. If they were to make a trade for a vet and then still add a mature rookie, I don't think there would be an issue.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#799 » by jivelikenice » Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:10 pm

Did they do the coin toss with Detroit yesterday?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,619
And1: 23,083
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#800 » by nate33 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:10 pm

Players always want more veterans and less youngters.

Return to Washington Wizards