2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
Tirion
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,752
- And1: 290
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
I just hope one of Noel, Porter, Oladipo will be there. Otherwise, I wouldn't be opposed of trading the pick. McLemore is too damn passive. Burke is too small. So is McCollum. The less is said about MCW the better.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Vindicater
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,948
- And1: 423
- Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Far too early to call but I saying we walk out of the draft with Shabazz and Adetokunbo.
Not sure best options there but that's who we will get.
Not sure best options there but that's who we will get.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Grits n Gravy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,627
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
wouldn't mind a trade back 9 + 26 to jazz for 14 + 21 - get some stephen adams + caldwell-pope/giannis/karasev and grab some nemanja nedovic in the 2nd round and call it a day. might give the jazz a chance to grab burke or carter-williams. would be stoked with that.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- MinneOOPalis
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,457
- And1: 1,415
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
- Location: Minneapolis
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
I've seen a bunch of mocks having Alex Len, MCW, and Burke all going top 9. Which is definitely possible looking at team needs. In this scenario it would ensure Oladipo or Shabazz fall to us.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
We need Burke, MCW, Zeller, Len all to go in the top-8. That would be perfect.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
C.lupus
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
MCW will go top 9 - to Minnesota


Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
Devilzsidewalk
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,042
- And1: 6,061
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
C.lupus wrote:MCW will go top 9 - to Minnesota![]()
![]()
![]()
"bro, gun b jus like isiah n dumars"
~ David Kahn

Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
It will be funny when we fast forward 2 years and the best SG out of the class will be Archie Goodwin and everyone's like, "oh man, that's who i wanted!"
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
moss_is_1
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Daniel Schroeder is shooting up draft boards...he wasn't even listed awhile back, now he's #20.
6'2 PG with 6'7" wingspan, awesome athlete, and only 19.
6'2 PG with 6'7" wingspan, awesome athlete, and only 19.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
LordBaldric
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,611
- And1: 1,970
- Joined: Jul 14, 2006
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Can we please have a decision on whether Taylor is bring back Kahn, and if Adelman is coming back soon please so we can properly prepare for this draft?
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
moss_is_1 wrote:Daniel Schroeder is shooting up draft boards...he wasn't even listed awhile back, now he's #20.
6'2 PG with 6'7" wingspan, awesome athlete, and only 19.
In before Klomp says we should take him #9.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- The J Rocka
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 13,570
- And1: 1,732
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Minneapolis
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
LordBaldric wrote:Can we please have a decision on whether Taylor is bring back Kahn, and if Adelman is coming back soon please so we can properly prepare for this draft?
RA will retire & Kahn gets a 3 year extension. He takes the solo approach for pre-draft workouts trying to sell some kid on his next blueprint outline. We go into the draft, still without a HC, where Kahn will show off his draft skills by trading down from 9 to 13 to 17 to mid 20s until we end up with the next Martell Webster + another Euro stash + future 1st + two 2nds, which he'll end up flipping for cash considerations + protected 2nd down the road.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,548
- And1: 22,926
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Krapinsky wrote:moss_is_1 wrote:Daniel Schroeder is shooting up draft boards...he wasn't even listed awhile back, now he's #20.
6'2 PG with 6'7" wingspan, awesome athlete, and only 19.
In before Klomp says we should take him #9.
Why would I say that? I'm the one thats voting AGAINST drafting a point guard (McCollum).
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Klomp wrote:Krapinsky wrote:moss_is_1 wrote:Daniel Schroeder is shooting up draft boards...he wasn't even listed awhile back, now he's #20.
6'2 PG with 6'7" wingspan, awesome athlete, and only 19.
In before Klomp says we should take him #9.
Why would I say that? I'm the one thats voting AGAINST drafting a point guard (McCollum).
Bahhahaha. You want a point guard - MCW -- and you bought into the Gary Harris hype so much that you said you thought he was the best SG in the draft.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,548
- And1: 22,926
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Krapinsky wrote:Bahhahaha. You want a point guard - MCW -- and you bought into the Gary Harris hype so much that you said you thought he was the best SG in the draft.
I believe that was if I had to choose between MCW and McCollum. MCW is 6'5". McCollum is 6'2" With three PGs already on roster, one of these would slide to SG. I'd much rather have the 6'5" guy at SG over the 6'2" guy.
And yes, I thought Harris was the most complete SG. Your point?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Klomp wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Bahhahaha. You want a point guard - MCW -- and you bought into the Gary Harris hype so much that you said you thought he was the best SG in the draft.
I believe that was if I had to choose between MCW and McCollum. MCW is 6'5". McCollum is 6'2" With three PGs already on roster, one of these would slide to SG. I'd much rather have the 6'5" guy at SG over the 6'2" guy.
And yes, I thought Harris was the most complete SG. Your point?
There's no point to be made, sheesh. Just predicting your excitement for Schroeder. Admit it, you're already talking yourself into him, aren't you?
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,548
- And1: 22,926
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Krapinsky wrote:There's no point to be made, sheesh. Just predicting your excitement for Schroeder. Admit it, you're already talking yourself into him, aren't you?
Nope. He may be a good player, but not for us. Only thing that would possibly intrigue me is the international factor.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
Klomp wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Bahhahaha. You want a point guard - MCW -- and you bought into the Gary Harris hype so much that you said you thought he was the best SG in the draft.
I believe that was if I had to choose between MCW and McCollum. MCW is 6'5". McCollum is 6'2" With three PGs already on roster, one of these would slide to SG. I'd much rather have the 6'5" guy at SG over the 6'2" guy.
And yes, I thought Harris was the most complete SG. Your point?
Klomp... smh.
MCW is a pure-point guard who can't shoot. At least McCollum has a great stroke and has the combo-guard label.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
- jade_hippo
- Starter
- Posts: 2,383
- And1: 135
- Joined: Jan 05, 2009
- Location: Take off... eh!
-
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
if we draft another guard from Syracuse I'm becoming a Heat fan. Just on our own history we should avoid this guy, questionable shooting is an even bigger red flag. MCW shouldn't even be an option.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
-
NewWolvesOrder
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9 lotto odds, #26, #52, #59)
If the top wing prospects are off the board I would seriously look into drafting a center prospect, mainly Alex Len. He would be in a perfect spot here slowly developing behind Pekovic. He's got much better physical tools than Pek and should be a good partner for Rubio for years to come. Gobert is another possible candidate.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves









