jnrjr79 wrote:(One last aside: you contend ownership's job is to get "wins/title shots." You do understand that prior to Derrick's injury, this team won more games over the previous two seasons than anyone else, and was considered one of the top 4 or 5 teams in the league, right? They may not have won championships yet, but at the same time, it isn't utter mediocrity, either.)
Well, we did all that without paying the tax. This year they wanted Derrick to come back but at the same time was trying to trade Rip to get under the tax.
I'll just say this, if our team was owned by the Lakers owner, do you think we would still have Asik?