nate33 wrote:Benjammin wrote:Rafael122 wrote:If available, I would take CJM at 14. I agree w/the Withey pick at #21. It also gives us the ability to move a couple of guys off the roster either for salary relief purposes or to acquire a pick in 2014.
I highly, highly doubt CJM would be there at 14. If you'd like to make a little friendly wager on it, I'm all in. This idea of trading back for more picks sounds appealing, but the NBA is not the NFL. Just because our GM struggles with player selection doesn't mean quantity is better than quality.
In general, I agree with you. Take the quality over quantity. But in this draft, my concern is that the talent value drops a tier just before we pick, but the tier we're in remains relatively even talentwise all the way down to the 14-15 range. Basically, we'd still be getting the same tier of talent at #14 that we would get at #8.
Let's assume the following 7 players go first (in any order):
Noel
McLemore
Porter
Bennett
Burke
Len
Oladipo
After that, the next tier includes:
McCollum
Zeller
Olynyk
Dieng
Carter-Martin
Plumlee
Gobert
Muhammed
And Dieng doesn't seem to rank that high within the group so he would probably be there at #14. Basically, I think Dieng is as good as any of the other guys in that tier, so #14 isn't really worse than #8.
All that said, I do not profess to be great at analyzing talent in the draft, so maybe I'm way off base. Among that second tier, do you think any stands head and shoulders above the rest?
I like Dieng and at 14 would be good value, but I don't like him as much as some. Having those seven off the board would be the worst case scenario and it's quite possible. I think I would probably take McCollum in that case. I'd love to feel better about Zeller or Olynyk or even Muhammad. 21 looks like an international potpourri which doesn't excite me

















