ImageImageImageImageImage

Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,486
And1: 2,135
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1361 » by Dark Faze » Mon May 6, 2013 1:16 pm

doclinkin wrote:Olynyk, I dunno. He's big enough, long enough, has some skill. Not bad. A legit center who is a little more proficient than just an 80's style Big White Stiff. But unlike Zeller's footspeed I don't see that Kelly has any one talent that beats his match-up in any significant way at the next level. Not bigger nor quicker nor more skilled nor longer. Sure he could have a decent career as a back-up big, occasional starter, but I don't what separates him from say Bucknell's big Mike Muscala, who can use the glass, hit over both shoulders, hit a jumper, and actually rebounded well in his own small conference schedule. (Caveat being: Elias Harris is an underrated rebounder and likely depressed KO's numbers on that front somewhat).

Worse though, neither one strikes me as a decent interior defender at the next level, a primary role for Bigs on successful squads. So I'm less interested in settling for either. If required to select between the two I think I'd take the upside of Zeller over the more polished Olynyk.

But if that's the pick, I'd rather trade down and pull Gorgui Dieng and another pick or a prospect.


A few points of argument--

1. Olynyk has tools that would kill a lot of modern bigs on the offensive end--foot speed is overrated. The thing Olynyk has is that he's extremely well coordinated, long, and knows how to exaggerate contact and finish. Think of guys like Dirk and Paul Pierce who aren't amazingly fast, but are great at "getting the bump".

The main difference I see between Zeller and Olynyk is that Zeller tries to beat guys moreso with his athleticism than with smarts. Just watch the DX draft videos--Zellers finishes are often a little wild and uncontrolled, he's usually going chest to chest with guys and then getting to the line. It's going to be much tougher to finish over NBA bigs who are much stronger.

Olynyk on the other hand is "sliding off" of defenders. He's acutely aware of his own length and position on the floor, and he'll use his body to shield the defender and use his length for a nice layup off glass and then finish at the line. To me there really isn't much of a comparison between the two offensively. Olynyk is on another level. Zeller has more bounce but he lacks Olynyks IQ and skillset.

As far as defense goes, you can't depend on either Olynyk or Zeller to be a rim protector, but the league is trending towards small ball. The Heat don't have a rim protector at any kind and rely on great rotations and cross matches. The Clippers have Deandre but they don't have him on the floor at the end of games, they pull in the more versatile Odom and go small. The Warriors finished games small, so did the Nuggets.

I just don't really care for projects at this stage. I want guys who are cerebral, who understand the game of basketball. Olynyk has that more than anyone in the draft. If we were to pass on him and he put in work for another team, you won't have any excuses. All the tools were there -- size, length, ridiculous advanced stats, tournament success.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,489
And1: 22,922
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1362 » by nate33 » Mon May 6, 2013 1:26 pm

Great debate guys. I keep reading opinions and having my mind changed. I now have no idea who I like best among Len, Zeller, Olynyk, Dieng and Adams.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,489
And1: 22,922
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1363 » by nate33 » Mon May 6, 2013 1:35 pm

Dark Faze wrote:As far as defense goes, you can't depend on either Olynyk or Zeller to be a rim protector, but the league is trending towards small ball. The Heat don't have a rim protector at any kind and rely on great rotations and cross matches. The Clippers have Deandre but they don't have him on the floor at the end of games, they pull in the more versatile Odom and go small. The Warriors finished games small, so did the Nuggets.

While it's true that some teams pull their bigs off the floor in crunch time, let's not make it sound like teams don't care about having a defensive stopper. The reason Jordan doesn't play late is because he shoots 38% from the FT line. Bogut shoots 50%. Joel Anthony is the worst big man to ever get significant minutes on a winning team. The fact that those teams go small in crunch time doesn't necessary signify a league-wide trend. Chicago leaves Noah in the games late. The Spurs leave in Duncan. The Knicks leave in Chandler. The Nets leave in Lopez. The Pacers leave in Hibbert. The Hawks leave in Horford. Memphis leaves in Gasol. And all those teams are better off because of it.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,486
And1: 2,135
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1364 » by Dark Faze » Mon May 6, 2013 1:41 pm

People might think I'm crazy, but Dieng might be a better pick for this team than anyone on the board, and you guys know how much I love Olynyk.

Seriously, to the point where I might actually consider picking him 8th.

Reason being he helps us on two ends--we don't have to keep Okafor long term which gives us a ton of money we can use and he helps us solidify the center position for years to come. Dieng is just PERFECT for todays game--he can defend the PNR better than anyone not named Noel, and maybe even that's arguable, he's a great rim protector--louisvilles entire system is only possible for him to clean up the errors.

The best part of it is that you can remove the biggest scare for this team moving forward--relying on an aging front court to retain our identity. We essentially can replace Okafor and get younger, freeing up that money in the process to strengthen other positions, all without changing our defensive identity.

I'd prefer to trade up and get him that way so we get two picks, but I think there's an argument that Dieng fills the biggest need we have moving forward on this team when you think long term.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,593
And1: 3,023
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1365 » by pancakes3 » Mon May 6, 2013 2:12 pm

Optimistically Dieng with his "late" start on learning the game, optimistically he could grow to be a cheap imitation of Greg Monroe which isn't all that bad.
Bullets -> Wizards
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1366 » by DCZards » Mon May 6, 2013 2:15 pm

Dark Faze wrote:People might think I'm crazy, but Dieng might be a better pick for this team than anyone on the board, and you guys know how much I love Olynyk


Actually, I don't think you're crazy for thinking that way. There's something about Dieng that makes me feel very secure. Yes, he doesn't have the potential of a Zeller or Olynyk on the offensive end or the overall upside of a Noel or Len, but whoever drafts Dieng will get a smart and hardworking big who passes, rebounds and defends the rim. A guy who won't need to score to have an impact on the game. I see Dieng as a better passing Tyson Chandler.

It would be hard to take Dieng with a top 10 pick, but I wouldn't rule it out. Right now, the big men I'd probably take over him are Noel, Len and Zeller...and maybe Olynyk. The thing that scares me about Olynyk, and Zeller to a lesser degree, is that I don't think either one is going to be much of a low-post defender, rebounder or shotblocker. And those are skills I'd really like to see in any big man that the Zards draft.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1367 » by Nivek » Mon May 6, 2013 2:43 pm

So, I did a minor tweak in YODA and have started generating similarity scores. It includes the categories I've been using, including a strength of schedule measure, but DOES NOT include any of the physical measurements stuff. I adjust for age/class, but not for position.

Here are Deing's most similar for this season:

  1. MKG
  2. Hasheem Thabeet, JR
  3. Terrence Jones, SO
  4. Patric Young, JR
  5. LaMarcus Aldridge, SO

For Cody Zeller:

  1. Jared Sullinger, FR
  2. Tyler Hansbrough, SO
  3. Paul Millsap, SO
  4. Jared Sullinger, SO
  5. Chris Wilcox, SO

For Kelly Olynyk:

  1. Joakim Noah, SO
  2. Tyler Zeller, SR
  3. Marcus Camby, SO
  4. Kenyon Martin, JR
  5. Tyler Hansbrough, SR

For Nerlens Noel:

  1. Tim Duncan, FR
  2. Dikembe Mutombo, JR
  3. Hasheem Thabeet, SO
  4. Gorgiu Deing, JR
  5. Greg Monroe, FR

Still a work in progress.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1368 » by fishercob » Mon May 6, 2013 2:51 pm

I would think similarity scores would be less of a useful tool than rankings. The goal is to figure out who to pick out of a pool of players, not how they stack up against guys from other pools (though there is some use in that too, for sure).
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,486
And1: 2,135
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1369 » by Dark Faze » Mon May 6, 2013 2:53 pm

In regards to production, some people compare Olynyk to Hawes. Hawes got decent minutes on a good defensive team in Philly, and he's had a PER of 18 and 16 over the last couple of years, with Olynyk being projected to be a decently superior player offensively while not quite as good defensively (Hawes is a decent shot blocker), though probably equal in rebounding.

Hawes has been better on the boards than expected in limited minutes. He's averaged around 26 minutes which is what I think Olynyk would get as a backup PF/C for this team, and Hawes has rebounded very well in that space.

Hawes in 27 minutes is a 10 and 7 guy who dishes out around 2 APG.

This sounds pretty average to okay, but it's important to remember that Nene has a huge effect on this team as a 13 and 7 guy with a PER of 17 this year. As a 36 MPG guy Hawes is a 15, 10 and 3-4 APG kind of guy.

With Olynyk, I think the offensive numbers are better, the rebounding numbers are the same, and the defense is slightly worse.

So as a backup Olynyk eventually is a 13 and 7 guy in limited minutes and probably a 17 , 9-10 RPG, 2-3 APG in 36 minutes should he ever start with average to slightly worse than average defense at C.

There's a ton of projecting on my part here, but I think it gives guys an idea of what Olynyk would be for this team, as I think some people are confused about where he places and how he'd look statistically if his current production carries over to the NBA, which is a big IF for almost anyone you draft though.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,593
And1: 3,023
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1370 » by pancakes3 » Mon May 6, 2013 3:54 pm

fishercob wrote:I would think similarity scores would be less of a useful tool than rankings. The goal is to figure out who to pick out of a pool of players, not how they stack up against guys from other pools (though there is some use in that too, for sure).


Well, it'd be interesting to see what the comparison scores of the 2009 kids. Maybe then we wouldn't be so cavalier to trade them for above-average journeymen.
Bullets -> Wizards
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1371 » by Ruzious » Mon May 6, 2013 4:52 pm

For those who repeatedly say Zeller has a 6'8 wingspan, wait till the combine measurements come out. That measurement was from when he was 17. For those of us who have followed him since the beginning of his freshman year rather than since March, he's an outstanding pure basketball player. He has great basketball skills. Because of that, I expect he will quickly develop the versatility to play the 4, while being big enough to play the 5. His strength is not likely going to be a weakness in the NBA. He's still growing as far as heft - a guy like Olynyk is already likely fully grown. Zeller has the best chance of all the draftees at being a top 2-way big in the NBA, clearly has the best all-around game of the bigs, and will just get better when he establishes a jump shot, IMO. Noel is the most talented. Withey is probably the 2nd best all-around big. Dieng is the next Okafor. Len is a talented prospect who could become very good and just as easily never be good. Olynyk is a guy who I think can be a poor man's skinnier Al Jefferson - Boston and Minnesota version. He'll probably put up some numbers on a losing team - key word being losing - that will impress some.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,307
And1: 2,467
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1372 » by nuposse04 » Mon May 6, 2013 5:09 pm

Ruzious wrote:For those who repeatedly say Zeller has a 6'8 wingspan, wait till the combine measurements come out. That measurement was from when he was 17. For those of us who have followed him since the beginning of his freshman year rather than since March, he's an outstanding pure basketball player. He has great basketball skills. Because of that, I expect he will quickly develop the versatility to play the 4, while being big enough to play the 5. His strength is not likely going to be a weakness in the NBA. He's still growing as far as heft - a guy like Olynyk is already likely fully grown. Zeller has the best chance of all the draftees at being a top 2-way big in the NBA, clearly has the best all-around game of the bigs, and will just get better when he establishes a jump shot, IMO. Noel is the most talented. Withey is probably the 2nd best all-around big. Dieng is the next Okafor. Len is a talented prospect who could become very good and just as easily never be good. Olynyk is a guy who I think can be a poor man's skinnier Al Jefferson - Boston and Minnesota version. He'll probably put up some numbers on a losing team - key word being losing - that will impress some.


He hasn't gotten any taller (at least from my POV) so I see no reason to think his wingspan has gotten noticeably better. Lets give him the benefit of the doubt and say he's at 6'10 now just for the sake of argument. He does run the floor well and has moves well without the ball but he has no respectable low post game to speak of...not an amazing mid range game...so I'm not exactly how he'd excl at either the 4 or 5. I think he's got a chance to be a good backup in the league...

We'll have a clearer view in about a week and half when the combine gets here. His best case scenario is like...a poor man's blake griffin.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,644
And1: 1,331
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1373 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Mon May 6, 2013 5:23 pm

Ruzious, good point, I keep reading this 6-8 wingspan from Zeller, but when I look at him his arms don't look that short. That's why I posted a couple back that I think him and Olynyk will test out very similar at the combine.

But Zeller's arms do look very unmuscular. He really needs to his the weight room and work on developing his arms as well as his chest & shoulders. Leg strength too. But he does not seem to have the alligator arms just when I'm looking at him.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,489
And1: 22,922
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1374 » by nate33 » Mon May 6, 2013 5:27 pm

Ruzious wrote:For those who repeatedly say Zeller has a 6'8 wingspan, wait till the combine measurements come out. That measurement was from when he was 17.

Good point. I have trouble believing that measurement. That's got to be one of the worst wingspan/height proportions I've ever seen...

Actually I just looked up the numbers. I computed a "TRex ratio" for all players drafted among the top 50 selections over the past 11 drafts. It's the ratio of wingspan to height. The average TRex ratio is 1.06, meaning most drafted NBA players have a wingspan that is 6% longer than their height (no shoes). Only two players out of the 370 in the database had a TRex ratio less than 1: J.J. Redick (.99) and Martynas Andriuskevicius (.98). If Zeller is 6-10.5 no shoes with a 6-8 wingspan, he would have a TRex ratio of .97 - the very worst in the past decade out of 370 players.

To give you an idea of how extremely T-Rex-armed that is, compare him to Tyler Zeller. Tyler Zeller ranks 359th out of the 370 players in TRex ratio. He has extremely short arms. If Cody had the same ratio as his brother, he would have a 6-11.5" wingspan. Instead, we are hearing that it is 6'-8". I just find that difficult to believe.

Ruzious wrote:Olynyk is a guy who I think can be a poor man's skinnier Al Jefferson - Boston and Minnesota version. He'll probably put up some numbers on a losing team - key word being losing - that will impress some.

That's a good comparison.
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,307
And1: 2,467
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1375 » by nuposse04 » Mon May 6, 2013 5:47 pm

Question to cult of Cody...how do you figure a big like Zeller plays in playoff basketball when teams actively stop fastbreak basketball and play a lot more traditional half court sets. Consider the centers he'd have to play in the east as well. Lopez, Noah, Bosh, Hibbert, Chandler, Varejo (if he can ever stay healthy), Drummond (I think the pistons should be playoff caliber shortly), Bynum (If he stops bowling) and Val. I don't see Cody's upside approaching any of those guys. His game is chaotic enough where he can make an impact in the regular season but he seems like just as much a project as any other "developmental" big in this draft. Did his mid range game improve this year? I honestly don't know, and think that will be crucial for him going up against the far larger competition in the east.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,593
And1: 3,023
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1376 » by pancakes3 » Mon May 6, 2013 6:24 pm

Weren't people saying a few years ago that if Hansborough was just a liiiiitle bit taller, he'd be pretty darn good? I think Zeller is the incarnate of that hypothetical. Certainly at Verejao level. Serviceable but not stellar. Zeller ain't stellar.
Bullets -> Wizards
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,177
And1: 7,953
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1377 » by Dat2U » Mon May 6, 2013 6:29 pm

doclinkin wrote:Not enthused with either of Zeller or KellyO.

With his short arms Zeller looks to be a PF in the NBA. Near 7 feet tall with a gradeschooler's 6'8" wingspan, despite a relatively broad chest, he's losing length in his standing reach more than anything. This is a killer, robs his rebound rate, neuters his defense, will prove troublesome in interior offense against real NBA length.

What he does at an NBA level: Good coordination in a transition finish, stays under control, manages the ball at speed, gets it in the hoop. Problem is his role as a Big is to snare the rebound and get it to the guards, not to lead the break, but okay he's not a horrorshow if a guard snags the board on a long bounce.

Great footwork on P&R defense and cutting off lanes, he may not block many shots or deter players from attacking lanes, but he can impede their progress without picking up a foul and make them pass to the next guy.

Quicks. Good reaction time going into his moves, this will help him get the split second to get that shot off that he'll need by lacking reach to shoot over NBA size bigs.

Room to improve? If he develops anywhere, what he'll need most at the next level is a reliable ranged shot. Fortunately this is one of the few skills players do develop coming into the league. And he shoots well with good form from FT's. (Actually In even in interior play when he goes up he squares up for a micro-jumper instead of powering through and over players or scooping it past). Good footwork though suggests he could add moves underneath too. Maybe.

Level of competition has been solid, seeing NBA caliber players every few games, with no real dip in his numbers in big games.

Really for his size his footspeed and body coordination are a positive mismatch, but he'll need everybit of it to succeed.

Olynyk, I dunno. He's big enough, long enough, has some skill. Not bad. A legit center who is a little more proficient than just an 80's style Big White Stiff. But unlike Zeller's footspeed I don't see that Kelly has any one talent that beats his match-up in any significant way at the next level. Not bigger nor quicker nor more skilled nor longer. Sure he could have a decent career as a back-up big, occasional starter, but I don't what separates him from say Bucknell's big Mike Muscala, who can use the glass, hit over both shoulders, hit a jumper, and actually rebounded well in his own small conference schedule. (Caveat being: Elias Harris is an underrated rebounder and likely depressed KO's numbers on that front somewhat).

Worse though, neither one strikes me as a decent interior defender at the next level, a primary role for Bigs on successful squads. So I'm less interested in settling for either. If required to select between the two I think I'd take the upside of Zeller over the more polished Olynyk.

But if that's the pick, I'd rather trade down and pull Gorgui Dieng and another pick or a prospect.


I gotta disagree strongly right here. Olynyk's game is predicated on skill. He makes 44% of his jump shots. He's over 35% from the college 3. He's got a developed face up game. He's effective in the pick & roll. He's got a solid low post game. He's one the best finishers in college basketball making over 75% of his shots. What more do you want? His PER is 36.2, he had a TS% of .675. He's got an offensive rating of 127.1 while using 30.7% of his possessions. His WS40 is .317, higher than Anthony Davis .312 who dominated CB last year. The questions about his defense & rebounding are legitimate, but the man is a high usage offensive machine. Complain about the competition you want but the he did what he was supposed to do, he outright dominated whoever he played against.

When talking about players that fit the best with John Wall, his name is at the top of my list.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1378 » by fishercob » Mon May 6, 2013 6:48 pm

Dat2U wrote:
I gotta disagree strongly right here. Olynyk's game is predicated on skill. He makes 44% of his jump shots. He's over 35% from the college 3. He's got a developed face up game. He's effective in the pick & roll. He's got a solid low post game. He's one the best finishers in college basketball making over 75% of his shots. What more do you want? His PER is 36.2, he had a TS% of .675. He's got an offensive rating of 127.1 while using 30.7% of his possessions. His WS40 is .317, higher than Anthony Davis .312 who dominated CB last year. The questions about his defense & rebounding are legitimate, but the man is a high usage offensive machine. Complain about the competition you want but the he did what he was supposed to do, he outright dominated whoever he played against.

When talking about players that fit the best with John Wall, his name is at the top of my list.


Good points, Dat. But:

I'm scared by the combination of strength of schedule and the fact that Olynyk's only had one year of this level of production (and he is a red shirt junior). Doesn't that bother you? If his game is predicated on skill and not athleticism, shouldn't he always have been this good? Also, what are the changes (I'm asking, I really don't know) that Olynyk was always this good (or close) and that Mark Few is a colossal idiot for not giving him more PT?

I can see arguments for why Olynyk is a version of Tom Chambers (thought 4 all-star games would shock me) and why he;s a version of Adam Morrison -- another Gonzaga star who was overwhelmed by the speed and athleticism of the NBA. I dunno. He scares me.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,486
And1: 2,135
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1379 » by Dark Faze » Mon May 6, 2013 6:59 pm

Olynyk actually showed good TS% numbers before he gained significant muscle and grew a couple of inches. He had a TS% of 63 and was a 20.4 PER player off the bench. He shot .44% from deep in his soph year. He was a 6, 4, and 1 player in 13 minutes PER.

With double those minutes that projects to 12, 8, and 2. If he shot as much as he did his junior year it'd be around 14, 8 and 2.

Along with minutes, Kelly improved on Free Throw Rate and FT% which improved his TS%. Better percentage was just from more reps more than likely due to playing time, and the rate probably went up due to being bigger/stronger. His improvements make a lot of sense when you look at his soph stats combined with his growth/strength training. The general thought that Olynyk went from a stiff to a beast is kind of misrepresented.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,817
And1: 10,441
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part III 

Post#1380 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon May 6, 2013 7:18 pm

Dark Faze wrote:People might think I'm crazy, but Dieng might be a better pick for this team than anyone on the board, and you guys know how much I love Olynyk.

Seriously, to the point where I might actually consider picking him 8th.

Reason being he helps us on two ends--we don't have to keep Okafor long term which gives us a ton of money we can use and he helps us solidify the center position for years to come. Dieng is just PERFECT for todays game--he can defend the PNR better than anyone not named Noel, and maybe even that's arguable, he's a great rim protector--louisvilles entire system is only possible for him to clean up the errors.

The best part of it is that you can remove the biggest scare for this team moving forward--relying on an aging front court to retain our identity. We essentially can replace Okafor and get younger, freeing up that money in the process to strengthen other positions, all without changing our defensive identity.

I'd prefer to trade up and get him that way so we get two picks, but I think there's an argument that Dieng fills the biggest need we have moving forward on this team when you think long term.


Dieng is certainly going to be a solid pro. I think he is easily a starting-caliber defensive C/PF in today's NBA.

The problem I have considering him the BEST pick is I don't think his offense is enough to meet what the Wizards need and he lacks size to be a real game changer at C. There are guys like Mike Muscala who can give the bigs offensive pop off the bench. I think dynamic aerial finishers like DJ Stephens and Jamaal Franklin can provide energy at both ends off the bench. I value them and CJ McCollum more than Dieng for the Wizards. Nate Wolters or Pierre Jackson can be like Jose Calderon and JJ Barea off the bench.

Dark Faze, Dieng is really good but IMO so are others
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.

Return to Washington Wizards