You are right, something has to give. Al and Paul are both UFA's. Both will most likely be gone and at worst only one will be back. Just because we have 4 legit quality big men (I wouldn't call Kanter a legit starter quite yet) doesn't mean that they should be traded pennies on the dollar, especially the one that has the most potential still, right before you lose two other ones to free agency. That is really dumb.
If you hangout here for a bit or the trade board, you will see all sorts of crap offers for Kanter. I am actually surprised that the guys weren't more hostile toward the OP. Other boards are much worse than we are. See what happens, if you posted an Al Jefferson S&T for Rondo or some other crap trade on Boston's board.
C's get Kanter
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Re: C's get Kanter
-
hoops4life
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,121
- And1: 31
- Joined: May 17, 2005
Re: C's get Kanter
-
BleedGreen1989
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,023
- And1: 3,904
- Joined: May 18, 2013
Re: C's get Kanter
Not sure how I stumbled on this lol but Bradley for Kanter is a pretty ugly offer and that's coming from a C's fan