ImageImage

Draft prospects @ 10

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,474
And1: 22,166
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#601 » by DusterBuster » Thu May 16, 2013 11:46 pm

GreenRiddler wrote:I can't believe I am saying this but I think Bazz is too risky @ 10. Reminds me to much of Xavier Henry.


I'd give this a -1 if I could. There's no such thing as "too risky @ 10". When you're picking that low, every player is going to carry a level of risk with them. Bazz is no more risky than Gobert, Dieng, Len, or anyone else in the 7-14 range of this years draft.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,866
And1: 1,626
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#602 » by Blazinaway » Thu May 16, 2013 11:53 pm

since many of us perhaps got a bit carried away with Gobert here is a guys (supposed analyst) opinon I saw late today

"I was excited to get an up-close look at Rudy Gobert, the supposed cream of a fairly deep international crop. He's exceptionally long, looking every bit of 7-foot-1, and can be a presence on the defensive end. However, he possesses virtually no offensive skills at this stage, and will be tossed around in the NBA. He's a "potential guy" who would be better-served staying in Europe for another couple years, but the word is he wants to come to the US this coming season. The problem is he wouldn't be able to handle the physical aspect and is a major liability on the offensive end."
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,474
And1: 22,166
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#603 » by DusterBuster » Fri May 17, 2013 12:05 am

Blazinaway wrote:since many of us perhaps got a bit carried away with Gobert here is a guys (supposed analyst) opinon I saw late today

"I was excited to get an up-close look at Rudy Gobert, the supposed cream of a fairly deep international crop. He's exceptionally long, looking every bit of 7-foot-1, and can be a presence on the defensive end. However, he possesses virtually no offensive skills at this stage, and will be tossed around in the NBA. He's a "potential guy" who would be better-served staying in Europe for another couple years, but the word is he wants to come to the US this coming season. The problem is he wouldn't be able to handle the physical aspect and is a major liability on the offensive end."


This is what worries me about him the most about him. That's why he reminds me a lot of McGee. Players with those types of frames generally are pretty similar defensively. Chris Johnson was another guy a lot like that. Guys who can make spectacular blocks, but when it comes to actually keeping your man from pounding his way to the rim, you might as well have a folding chair there. So I don't know how much of a "rim protector" he's going to really be. Especially considering how easily he's going to get boxed out for rebounds too.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
User avatar
Shem
RealGM
Posts: 15,643
And1: 3,524
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#604 » by Shem » Fri May 17, 2013 12:09 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/blazers_olive/status/335184464177147905[/tweet]
April 4, 2014:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland


Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,474
And1: 22,166
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#605 » by DusterBuster » Fri May 17, 2013 12:17 am

There was an interesting sentence in that article....

If the Blazers keep their lottery pick -- and that's a big if as it appears Olshey will look for willing trade partners -- it is likely the team pursues a shooting guard.


It's possible this could just be Quick speculating. If that's accurate though, it could mean to start focusing a lot more on the SG's of this draft instead of the C's, especially considering most of the C's at 10 look to be just as big of projects as Meyers is.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,866
And1: 1,626
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#606 » by Blazinaway » Fri May 17, 2013 12:29 am

also lets not forget Dieng, Givony just tweeted Dieng has the second longest standing reach but he did not give the numbers, he has been said he has a 7'4 to 7'6" wingspan. He rolled an ankle so did not participate in today's drills
The Sebastian Express
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,487
And1: 11,897
Joined: Dec 10, 2004

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#607 » by The Sebastian Express » Fri May 17, 2013 12:47 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/335194085092642817[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/335194795402227713[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/335194547405590528[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/chadfordinsider/status/335195833911885827[/tweet]
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,474
And1: 22,166
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#608 » by DusterBuster » Fri May 17, 2013 12:58 am

Gobert's stats are pretty insane.

Chad Ford wrote:Rudy Gobert 7'0.5" in socks and 7'2" in shoes with a crazy 7'8.5" wingspan and insane 9'7" standing reach.


Apparently the wingspan and standing reach are both records for the combine according to DX.

Compare that to the guy I've been saying he's similar to because of his frame in McGee.

6' 11" in socks 7' 0" in shoes 7' 6" wingspan and a 9' 6.5" standing reach. So Gobert is slightly bigger is every category. But again, still doesn't mean much if he gets pushed around easily.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,493
And1: 2,229
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#609 » by Norm2953 » Fri May 17, 2013 1:07 am

I do think it very likely we will end up picking a guard at 10 assuming we keep the pick
for we'd have to deal Meyers if we picked another project big like Gobert.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,474
And1: 22,166
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#610 » by DusterBuster » Fri May 17, 2013 1:25 am

Norm2953 wrote:I do think it very likely we will end up picking a guard at 10 assuming we keep the pick
for we'd have to deal Meyers if we picked another project big like Gobert.


Not necessarily. Quite honestly, Meyers looked more like a PF than a C last season anyhow. Portland could have two projects, BUT if that's how they're going to roll, they need to commit to it fully and ship off the veterans in LMA and Wes.

The SG's in this draft should be less of a project and should be able to contribute right away. So if they pick a SG, that would seem to signify two things; 1) they couldn't get a deal done and 2) they're still trying to stick with their plan of being competitive with what they've got.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,448
And1: 8,146
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#611 » by Wizenheimer » Fri May 17, 2013 1:40 am

JasonStern wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:would 10th pick + rights to Kostas Papanikolou + Meyers Leonard be too much to pay for Gobert?

Blazers should force something and do something stupid. Getting a mediocre vet C on a big, long, contract, especially if the acquisition cost is high, could very well equal doing something stupid


one can argue that giving up on a just turned 21 year old meyers leonard after one year of player development plus a lotto draft pick for a player that can only earn 10 minutes a game in eurocup could very well equal doing something stupid.


I made it pretty clear I was just throwing stuff at the wall.

and by the way, Gobert' only played in 3 euro-cup games. In Marc Gasols first 23 games in Euro and ACB play, he averaged less then 6 minutes a game. Good thing then that Portland didn't draft him in 2007

I stand by my contention that Portland may be better served in the long run by trying to find and develop their own defensive C rather then looking for some short cut. The viable options among veteran C's is pretty unattractive this summer
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,448
And1: 8,146
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#612 » by Wizenheimer » Fri May 17, 2013 1:46 am

DusterBuster wrote:Gobert's stats are pretty insane.

Chad Ford wrote:Rudy Gobert 7'0.5" in socks and 7'2" in shoes with a crazy 7'8.5" wingspan and insane 9'7" standing reach.


Apparently the wingspan and standing reach are both records for the combine according to DX.

.


Wingspan:

Mamadou Ndiaye - 2012 8' 1"
John Riek - 2008 7' 8.75"
Alexis Ajinca - 2007 7' 8.75"
Saer Sene - 2006 7' 8.5"
Gobert 7' 8.5"

Standing Reach:

Pavel Podkolzine - 2003 9' 8"
Guy Marc-Michel - 2011 9' 7"
Boban Marjanovic - 2009 9' 7"
Gobert 9' 7"
JaVale McGee - 2008 9' 6.5"

looking at the lists, it's not exactly a good indication of NBA attributes
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,474
And1: 22,166
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#613 » by DusterBuster » Fri May 17, 2013 1:55 am

Wizenheimer wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:Gobert's stats are pretty insane.

Chad Ford wrote:Rudy Gobert 7'0.5" in socks and 7'2" in shoes with a crazy 7'8.5" wingspan and insane 9'7" standing reach.


Apparently the wingspan and standing reach are both records for the combine according to DX.

.


Wingspan:

Mamadou Ndiaye - 2012 8' 1"
John Riek - 2008 7' 8.75"
Alexis Ajinca - 2007 7' 8.75"
Saer Sene - 2006 7' 8.5"
Gobert 7' 8.5"

Standing Reach:

Pavel Podkolzine - 2003 9' 8"
Guy Marc-Michel - 2011 9' 7"
Boban Marjanovic - 2009 9' 7"
Gobert 9' 7"
JaVale McGee - 2008 9' 6.5"

looking at the lists, it's not exactly a good indication of NBA attributes


Apparently you didn't read my whole post as in the section you edited out, I tried to make that exact point.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
User avatar
James72
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,984
And1: 474
Joined: May 05, 2013
     

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#614 » by James72 » Fri May 17, 2013 2:17 am

If we were drafting in the early 20's then yeah i would probably jump on the Gobert train. Euro bigs always scare me though...Way too many busts.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,275
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 09, 2009

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#615 » by lukeyrid13 » Fri May 17, 2013 2:46 am

I am extremely happy to see Pavel Podkolzine in this thread. Imagine if he and Ha had teamed up?!
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#616 » by Jsun947 » Fri May 17, 2013 2:49 am

That's because guys with that size usually lack speed, quickness, agility, good hands, and timing. They are at the combine because they are big, not because they are athletes.

Gobert has all of those things going for him. He looks like a basketball player, not a big guy trying to pretend to be one.
User avatar
James72
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,984
And1: 474
Joined: May 05, 2013
     

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#617 » by James72 » Fri May 17, 2013 2:53 am

Jsun947 wrote:That's because guys with that size usually lack speed, quickness, agility, good hands, and timing. They are at the combine because they are big, not because they are athletes.

Gobert has all of those things going for him. He looks like a basketball player, not a big guy trying to pretend to be one.


I agree, thats why a pick like #20 or #21 would be well justified. TAt that range, you arent expected to be a chump.
JD45
General Manager
Posts: 7,998
And1: 263
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#618 » by JD45 » Fri May 17, 2013 2:56 am

Norm2953 wrote:I do think it very likely we will end up picking a guard at 10 assuming we keep the pick
for we'd have to deal Meyers if we picked another project big like Gobert.


That would assume that both Gobert and Leonard turn into good starting Centers. It is more likely that at least 1 of them does not. And very possible that both don't. So I would be all for drafting Gobert and letting them fight it out. If one is a good Center and one a good backup, that would be terrific. If a miracle happens and they both deserve to start, then it will be easy to trade one to fill another need.
"Government is the great fiction through which everyone endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else"

Frederic Bastiat
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#619 » by Jsun947 » Fri May 17, 2013 3:12 am

If you wait until 20-21 there is a very very small percentage of picks that become nba rotation players. Gobert deserves to go in the lottery in this draft.
User avatar
Shem
RealGM
Posts: 15,643
And1: 3,524
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: Draft prospect early editon ***Updated Polls 

Post#620 » by Shem » Fri May 17, 2013 3:39 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/jwquick/status/335226844393652224[/tweet]
I saw the name Mike Muscala and looked up his scouting video:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtGdt51d96A[/youtube]
April 4, 2014:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland


Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas

Return to Portland Trail Blazers