How Has the Draft Lottery Shaped the NBA

Moderators: bwgood77, Dirk, Domejandro, zimpy27, ken6199, cupcakesnake, infinite11285, KingDavid, bisme37, Clav

cdubbz
RealGM
Posts: 15,741
And1: 4,090
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Oakland
 

Re: How Has the Draft Lottery Shaped the NBA 

Post#21 » by cdubbz » Wed May 22, 2013 3:28 am

Maybe the lottery should only be for the worst 3teams instead of the bottom 14.
Kuya wrote: a good agent collects all the data, including quotes to give them leverage in contract deals.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 53,640
And1: 37,258
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: How Has the Draft Lottery Shaped the NBA 

Post#22 » by og15 » Wed May 22, 2013 3:35 am

SaveOurBullets wrote:
AQuintus wrote:
blind prophet wrote:
Nah people would throw too many games.


Who cares? If a team wants to throw games, and lose millions of dollars in ticket sales doing so, they should be able to.

Also, it's not like it isn't happening anyway. The term "tanking for draft picks" exists in the current NBA for a reason.

Then imagine how much worse it would be if teams knew they could guarantee themselves the next once in a generation prospect. It's an affront to the integrity of the game.

You mean you don't want to see unnecessary DNP's?

AQuintus wrote:
blind prophet wrote:
Nah people would throw too many games.


Who cares? If a team wants to throw games, and lose millions of dollars in ticket sales doing so, they should be able to.

Also, it's not like it isn't happening anyway. The term "tanking for draft picks" exists in the current NBA for a reason.

They won't loose enough that they can't make back when they get the first pick the next season. And being bad as opposed to very bad won't likely have much impact on their ticket sales and attendance
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 93,884
And1: 37,473
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: How Has the Draft Lottery Shaped the NBA 

Post#23 » by RIPskaterdude » Wed May 22, 2013 3:36 am

cdubbz wrote:Maybe the lottery should only be for the worst 3teams instead of the bottom 14.


Make it a lottery for top 5, imo.
Image
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 53,640
And1: 37,258
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: How Has the Draft Lottery Shaped the NBA 

Post#24 » by og15 » Wed May 22, 2013 3:38 am

RIPskaterdude wrote:
cdubbz wrote:Maybe the lottery should only be for the worst 3teams instead of the bottom 14.


Make it a lottery for top 5, imo.

Of course now you just have a battle of teams trying to get into top 5 worst records, not sure that is a solution.

How about make it random between 5 and 14 every year, so teams never know exactly how many of them will be in the lottery, though you still know that at least 5th would get you in
User avatar
pross
Veteran
Posts: 2,753
And1: 174
Joined: Apr 30, 2009

Re: How Has the Draft Lottery Shaped the NBA 

Post#25 » by pross » Wed May 22, 2013 3:42 am

wolves_89 wrote:
Jake0890 wrote:Charlotte getting MKG instead of Davis is the worst to my memory. The fact that a team with the worst winning percentage in NBA HISTORY gets the #2 pick is beyond me. Not to mention their window just got pushed back even further because MKG is obviously not as good as Davis.

Personally, the lottery sucks and needs to go away.


I would probably rate Vancouver moving from 1 to 4 in 1997 (and losing Tim Duncan) and Minnesota moving from 1 to 3 in 1992 (and losing Shaquille O'Neal) as being worse. Both Duncan and O'Neal were considered to be among the best talents of their generation when they were drafted (and both turned into Hall of Fame players).


I agree for the simple fact that the Grizz would probably still be in Vancouver now had Duncan been drafted there.
Image
statsman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,334
And1: 898
Joined: Aug 20, 2006

Re: How Has the Draft Lottery Shaped the NBA 

Post#26 » by statsman » Wed May 22, 2013 3:55 am

Mats272-GOAT wrote:Can someone who can be bothered to figure it out post the odds of getting 4th from 1st? Surely the chance of dropping 3 spots in less than 25%?

The #1 seeded team in the lottery has a 35.7% chance of ending up with the #4 pick.

Return to The General Board