Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,073
- And1: 180
- Joined: Jul 06, 2012
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
my first choice would be to trade back with OKC or Utah and take Schroder at 12 or 14 and bwa with the other pick (21,29). I wouldnt even mind trading with Atlanta (17,18), but Schroders probably off the board at 17. if im forced to take sombody at 8 im going Zeller or possibly Bennett, if hes willing to accept and embrace the fact that hes a PF.
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,443
- And1: 303
- Joined: May 20, 2007
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
Selecting Len or Gobert could give us 48 straight minutes of rim-protection per game at center.
AND we would never see Jason Maxiell at center. If he is on the team at all. *nervous bcuz Joe D*
AND we would never see Jason Maxiell at center. If he is on the team at all. *nervous bcuz Joe D*
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,284
- And1: 62
- Joined: Feb 05, 2004
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
Caldwell-Pope. He's a remorseless perimeter gunner in half-court sets, with about 80% of his attempts from the field being jump shots. Most scouts see that as a bug; for the Pistons, I think it's a feature. Despite supposedly questionable shot selection, his true shooting percentage is right around 60%. He's a very good athlete, good in the open court and a good individual perimeter defender. If Oladipo and Burke are gone, I think he's the best fit, which makes him first among equal question mark prospects.
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 949
- And1: 199
- Joined: Feb 21, 2001
-
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
Shocked at how many people want 6'4" shamu, who can't defend, can't shoot, can only drive left. Can't play sf, not quick enough for sg. bust bust bust, imo. One guy I can't see any value in. but, meh, maybe it's just me.
Dennis is my pick...
followed by who I think it might be...
c.j. mccollum
zeller
possible pick...
mcw
.....
We need 3 point shooters, we need a small forward, we need a point guard. Otto Parker is probably the guy detroit would like most. A few pg's with plus and minus.
No real sf's beyond parker at our draft spot.
Dennis is my pick...
followed by who I think it might be...
c.j. mccollum
zeller
possible pick...
mcw
.....
We need 3 point shooters, we need a small forward, we need a point guard. Otto Parker is probably the guy detroit would like most. A few pg's with plus and minus.
No real sf's beyond parker at our draft spot.
BigDaddyJungle
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,422
- And1: 769
- Joined: Apr 20, 2010
-
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
JustinSane wrote:Caldwell-Pope. He's a remorseless perimeter gunner in half-court sets, with about 80% of his attempts from the field being jump shots. Most scouts see that as a bug; for the Pistons, I think it's a feature. Despite supposedly questionable shot selection, his true shooting percentage is right around 60%. He's a very good athlete, good in the open court and a good individual perimeter defender. If Oladipo and Burke are gone, I think he's the best fit, which makes him first among equal question mark prospects.
I totally agree. Hes what Detroit needs.
A. Perimeter Defense
B. Floor Stretching Ability
C. Athleticism
Detroit Sports Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/need4detroit
bkseven wrote:He's between average and above average.
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,918
- And1: 936
- Joined: Jul 19, 2009
-
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
Add playmaker(s) to that list.
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,422
- And1: 769
- Joined: Apr 20, 2010
-
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
rmfc wrote:Add playmaker(s) to that list.
I don't really see any playmakers in Detroit's range. Theres not really any in the draft other than MCW.
Detroit Sports Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/need4detroit
bkseven wrote:He's between average and above average.
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,918
- And1: 936
- Joined: Jul 19, 2009
-
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
need4detroit wrote:rmfc wrote:Add playmaker(s) to that list.
I don't really see any playmakers in Detroit's range. Theres not really any in the draft other than MCW.
Oh, I know. I was just saying that one of the Pistons' biggest needs is finding an elite playmaker(s).
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,918
- And1: 936
- Joined: Jul 19, 2009
-
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
^Schroeder, may be(if the Pistons are actually willing to trade up into the first round again)?
I've never watched him play because I don't have the time or the opportunity to watch international league bball...but I have read glowing reports about his playmaking ability.
Rondo with a jumper?? What's not to like? Obviously, the Pistons have to put the time and effort to bring him along and I just don't see it happening because of the current state of ownership and the management.
I've never watched him play because I don't have the time or the opportunity to watch international league bball...but I have read glowing reports about his playmaking ability.
Rondo with a jumper?? What's not to like? Obviously, the Pistons have to put the time and effort to bring him along and I just don't see it happening because of the current state of ownership and the management.
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,221
- And1: 443
- Joined: Nov 28, 2012
Re: Preliminary, Who you Got at #8?
Excellent last 5 posts. Pope might be the best fit in the draft for us. Or so might MCW. Or so might McCollum who I believe will prove to be a willing and talented passer - somewhat in the the Curry mode, although not likely to be that elite of a player.
I say pick the best player from that group of 3, or Bennett if he's in a higher Tier and available. We cannot know for sure who will be the best fit with Knight, since we cannot know for sure at this moment in time what Knight's best role will be and what his ceiling is.
I'd love it if Joe gets to pick his top choice from that group of 4 players. There's a very good chance that a couple of them will be gone before we select. Noel, Burke, McLemore, Porter, Oladipo for sure will go ahead of #8. Zeller and Len figure to be in the mix for the top 7, as perhaps might Steven Adams. Shabazz, Goebert and Schroeder seem like more remote choices to go in the top 7.
I continue to believe Shabazz is in great danger of falling outside the top 15. But Schroeder could very well have enough intrigue as an international prospect with a Rondo-like reputation, to be a possible top 8 pick, but I doubt at this time that he'd be a Pistons pick. I see Joe going for a more known quantity, unless Schroeder just kicks everyone's ass in the team workouts.
I say pick the best player from that group of 3, or Bennett if he's in a higher Tier and available. We cannot know for sure who will be the best fit with Knight, since we cannot know for sure at this moment in time what Knight's best role will be and what his ceiling is.
I'd love it if Joe gets to pick his top choice from that group of 4 players. There's a very good chance that a couple of them will be gone before we select. Noel, Burke, McLemore, Porter, Oladipo for sure will go ahead of #8. Zeller and Len figure to be in the mix for the top 7, as perhaps might Steven Adams. Shabazz, Goebert and Schroeder seem like more remote choices to go in the top 7.
I continue to believe Shabazz is in great danger of falling outside the top 15. But Schroeder could very well have enough intrigue as an international prospect with a Rondo-like reputation, to be a possible top 8 pick, but I doubt at this time that he'd be a Pistons pick. I see Joe going for a more known quantity, unless Schroeder just kicks everyone's ass in the team workouts.