Jester_ wrote: You want to purposefully lose to get a draft pick, that's all it boils down to.
no, we dont. reading is fundamental.
Tank for Wiggins campaign...
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Re: Tank for Wiggins campaign...
-
king everything
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,141
- And1: 147
- Joined: Dec 14, 2005
- Location: Hogtown
Re: Tank for Wiggins campaign...
no, we dont. reading is fundamental.
Re: Tank for Wiggins campaign...
-
Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 17,043
- And1: 8,319
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Tank for Wiggins campaign...
should we maybe change the title of this thread? it attracts the wrong type of attention and skewing the debate off to irrelevant topics from people who are just attracted by the title and don't bother to read the thread.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Tank for Wiggins campaign...
-
king everything
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,141
- And1: 147
- Joined: Dec 14, 2005
- Location: Hogtown
Re: Tank for Wiggins campaign...
Inigo Montoya wrote:should we maybe change the title of this thread? it attracts the wrong type of attention and skewing the debate off to irrelevant topics from people who are just attracted by the title and don't bother to read the thread.
Idk, I kinda like being able to make fun of em when they do the ASSume thing...
Re: Tank for Wiggins campaign...
-
Joel Embust
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,801
- And1: 3,056
- Joined: Feb 11, 2005
-
