ImageImageImageImageImage

Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1081 » by sfam » Mon May 27, 2013 1:35 am

WizarDynasty wrote:there is absolutely no way porter will be a better small forward than shabazz. the biggest weapon shabazz has that wasn't shown in college is that he has an explosive first step. that will be his meal ticket in the nba. He's has the exact same standing reach as porter, much better catch and shoot which works perfect for john wall and he attacks and draws fouls because his first step will consistently force the defense to collapse. Having both Wall and Shabazz be able to get into the lane and will plus shabazz is an outstanding catch and shoot will have the wizards looking like a golden state. Adams---tim duncan type game---minus the polished post moves duncan showed by his fourth year in college but Adams would definitely be just as polished if he had three more years, tie between Bennett--carmelo anthony game and Shabazz---joe johnson with more explosive first step, and my fourth guy and far and away from the top three is otto porter---aka james posey/meet dorrel wright/corey brewer as his ceiling..
people seem to forget that martell webster was a lottery pick that has been injured most his career. we are bearing the fruits of what made him a lotto pick. Noel is pretty much Brendan Wright/ hassan whiteside reincarnated...the rookie one...not the refined one that plays for dallas now.


Porter is and should be rated lots higher than Shabazz. Outside of scoring, Shabazz doesn't give you much, except for a selfish attitude. Porter will fill the stat sheet. He can be a point forward when Wall is on the bench and seems to have a far far higher BBIQ. Porter will fit in wonderfully with the wizards' mindset and tempo. I may like Bennett more than Porter, but I wouldn't be looking at Shabazz in the top 10.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1082 » by theGreatRC » Mon May 27, 2013 2:26 am

If you guys want Bazz, we'll trade you the #3 for #9 + player and we get our guy, you gets yours
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,817
And1: 10,441
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1083 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon May 27, 2013 2:29 am

stevemcqueen1 wrote:
AFM wrote:Really good analysis, stevemcqueen. I don't usually read long posts but those last two on Bennett and Porter are a must read IMO.
As I said before, I will be happy with either. But I'm leaning towards Bennett more everyday.


Thanks, I think I'm in a similar place as you. I like both Porter and Bennett and would be happy with both. But Bennett scares me. There are classic red flags with him. I wish I could get inside Ernie and Wittman's head with Bennett, more so than any other prospect. If our interest in him is legit, I want to know what Wittman in particular thinks about his motor and all the raw parts of his game.

I want to know if at some point in the evaluation process Wittman has gone, "I've talked to him, I figured out how he ticks. I can coach him up on defense and teach him how to play off the ball in my system." If we draft him, I hope he's Wittman's guy. If Wittman endorses him, I'll be a lot less nervous about the pick.


I like Wittman. He did a solid job coaching. I would consider him a candidate to coach o rr the long haul.

At the same time Beal is a prodigy. Wall took three years to blossom and did so IMO on his own. Every other guy under 24 has regressed, badly, or they've been traded.

I think the Wizards would be far better off with a new GM and a different coach who can mold young guys. In fairness, Randy has been tremendous with the team building with added vets.

Bennett is not a safe pick IMO.

Adams rates bigger but Olynyk is a no brainer, as are McCollum, Porter, and Oladipo.

If Porter and Oladipo are gone a trade for Olynyk would be smart.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1084 » by sfam » Mon May 27, 2013 2:31 am

theGreatRC wrote:If you guys want Bazz, we'll trade you the #3 for #9 + player and we get our guy, you gets yours

Only one poster here wants Bazz.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,600
And1: 272
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1085 » by WizarDynasty » Mon May 27, 2013 2:34 am

sfam wrote:
WizarDynasty wrote:there is absolutely no way porter will be a better small forward than shabazz. the biggest weapon shabazz has that wasn't shown in college is that he has an explosive first step. that will be his meal ticket in the nba. He's has the exact same standing reach as porter, much better catch and shoot which works perfect for john wall and he attacks and draws fouls because his first step will consistently force the defense to collapse. Having both Wall and Shabazz be able to get into the lane and will plus shabazz is an outstanding catch and shoot will have the wizards looking like a golden state. Adams---tim duncan type game---minus the polished post moves duncan showed by his fourth year in college but Adams would definitely be just as polished if he had three more years, tie between Bennett--carmelo anthony game and Shabazz---joe johnson with more explosive first step, and my fourth guy and far and away from the top three is otto porter---aka james posey/meet dorrel wright/corey brewer as his ceiling..
people seem to forget that martell webster was a lottery pick that has been injured most his career. we are bearing the fruits of what made him a lotto pick. Noel is pretty much Brendan Wright/ hassan whiteside reincarnated...the rookie one...not the refined one that plays for dallas now.


Porter is and should be rated lots higher than Shabazz. Outside of scoring, Shabazz doesn't give you much, except for a selfish attitude. Porter will fill the stat sheet. He can be a point forward when Wall is on the bench and seems to have a far far higher BBIQ. Porter will fit in wonderfully with the wizards' mindset and tempo. I may like Bennett more than Porter, but I wouldn't be looking at Shabazz in the top 10.

so you are telling me Shabazz and sophmore wouldn't destroy Porter as a sophmore.
Players who can take over a game in the fourth quarter are drafted in top of the lottery, not glue guys. Porter was a sophmore and didn't even lead his team deep into the playoffs. He studied Gtown's offense for nearly two years. Shabazz was a plug and play player and showed far more skill. Porter's 2.7 assist per game doesn't make him a special player especially considering that he is sophmore. Porter's is never going to force a team to double team him.
another hint to look at in stats is how many fta did porter get vs muhammad in their freshman years. all superstars in the nba have over 450 fta. Superstar players know how to force a defense to foul them. that seems to be a huge element missing in this discussion.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,817
And1: 10,441
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1086 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon May 27, 2013 2:43 am

sfam wrote:
Deeptu McPullup wrote:BTW, the Kevin Pelton chats over on ESPN are always excellent and extended. It's a mix of draft, playoffs and player comparison talk. I skimmed the last one and there were maybe fifteen or more Wizards' related questions along with a good bit of general early lottery prospect talk.

http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/48060


Interesting chat. Pelton sees Len as the biggest bust potential in the top 10 (I might agree with that). He's also a big Porter supporter to the point he'd prefer the Wiz to trade down if Porter and Noel are gone.


Trade down for Olynyk.

Allen Crabbe or Jamal Franklin can be EXCELLENT value picks in a trade down.

The smart play would be to try and get one of them and Muscala.

In round two Nate Wolters might be better than Trey Burke.

I'm more excited about Wolters than Porter, Bennett, or Len. Washington is a playoff team that drops off sharply when Wall's playmaking is missing. They need a scoring playmaker. Wolters is a terrific scorer who will be an excellent playmaker in the NBA. Concerns about his defense should not overshadow his body of work on offense.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1087 » by sfam » Mon May 27, 2013 2:45 am

WizarDynasty wrote:so you are telling me Shabazz and sophmore wouldn't destroy Porter as a sophmore.
Players who can take over a game in the fourth quarter are drafted in top of the lottery, not glue guys. Porter was a sophmore and didn't even lead his team deep into the playoffs. He studied Gtown's offense for nearly two years. Shabazz was a plug and play player and showed far more skill. Porter's 2.7 assist per game doesn't make him a special player especially considering that he is sophmore. Porter's is never going to force a team to double team him.
another hint to look at in stats is how many fta did porter get vs muhammad in their freshman years. all superstars in the nba have over 450 fta. Superstar players know how to force a defense to foul them. that seems to be a huge element missing in this discussion.


I'm telling you I wouldn't make my draft selection based on who wins a one on one game. I just stated my main concern with Shabazz other than character is that all he does is score points. You in essence respond by saying, "Shabazz scores more points than Porter." OK, say we agree on that - you are only restating my objection to Shabazz. And nothing about Shabazz' game says superstar to me. He far more resembles Nick Young than Dwane Wade.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,817
And1: 10,441
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1088 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon May 27, 2013 2:49 am

Dark Faze wrote:
nate33 wrote:This stat geek likes Porter much more than Bennett. He ranks Porter as a very likely to be an all-star caliber player, with Bennett being a hit or miss prospect. Application of his system to the last 3 draft classes have been pretty accurate.


awesome stuff Nate and very intriguing


Please note he rates Wolters and Crabbe ahead of Len. He is right. Trade down and pick Wolters. Crabbe and Muscala are great prospects. This is too hard for EG and Ted but obvious to some.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1089 » by verbal8 » Mon May 27, 2013 2:53 am

The Consiglieri wrote:
sfam wrote:
nate33 wrote:Yeah. It's making me reconsider my preference for Bennett.

It's worth mentioning that he presumably developed this model by backtesting it over the last couple of drafts. As a result, it's going to show pretty good results retroactively, but it doesn't necessarily mean it'll be that predictive going forward. I wonder how many drafts he has backtested his model on. If it's just the 3 he posted, then it gives me much less confidence in his model. If his model holds up for the last 10 drafts or so, then it would be pretty significant.

I only saw the 3 year thing, and it read like he modified his approach based on getting good results for the last three years. It might be accurate, but I don't have lots of confidence in it yet. I too would like to know what his stats showed prior to the last 3 years.


Am I the only person that's not hugely impressed with it? I think Nivek would stand up to it, and a lot of us as well. There are some 'clear and palpable hits', George and Monroe in '10, sniffing out the overvalue o Turner and Favors in that draft (though I still like Favors), Leonard, Butler and Faried in '11, though many of us loved Faried and Butler, and nothing about '12 is particularly impressive. To me it's not noticeably different than the best of us, though I like that he can build a system well.


I think his system may at least need some tweaking. One thing I noticed was the worst ranked players tend to at least contribute some. I think Bernard James was the worst in last years draft. It may be that he is overrating age in his analysis. I think he mentioned basically standing reach and no-step vertical seemed to be all that matter in terms of physical attributes. That is probably an over-simplification, but probably a sign he is on the right track.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1090 » by hands11 » Mon May 27, 2013 3:02 am

sfam wrote:
hands11 wrote:sfam

You ask if Randy has equal voice in the process.

I don't believe I said he did. I said he would have a voice and I don't think that is a stretch. I would imagine that is true of most teams. What I was (speculating) was that all things being equal, I think Randy will have more of a voice this year.

Also, Randy is commenting on these players like he has a voice. But he does say, now that what I want, the front office might see if differently.

What I said was, with EG in his last year and EG being the politician he is (9 lives Ernie), all things being equal, I think he would want this pick to be a consensus pick. He would want Randy's buy in and he would want Ted to know he has Randy's buy in. I would expect he also wants Ted to know Don is onboard.

I see it as a process they will go through. I expect Don Newman to be involved as well.

What we had was a Randy interview. I think we can extract some information from that. I expect we can get much less from an EG interview because EG usually reveals anything when he talks. Randy is different. They are two completely different kinds of people.

Do that clear up what I was saying ?

I don't really feel like discussing this much further. I certainly respect you as a poster and have always liked reading your opinions. I just felt your assessment of both the interview and method of choosing a pick was pretty far out there and still do. This doesn't mean I intend anything personal about it then or now - I was just responding to the thoughts expressed. Bottom line, if EG thinks Bennett is the right choice, or Len or Porter, or more likely Noel if he falls and Wittman flat out disagrees based on Noel not being able to contribute this year, I don't see EG modifying his choice to please Wittman or working long and hard to build consensus. I fully admit I could be wrong about this though.


As could I. :wink:
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1091 » by hands11 » Mon May 27, 2013 3:07 am

nate33 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
awesome stuff Nate and very intriguing


Wow, looking at his model, Noel & Porter are studs. Interesting stuff.

Yeah. It's making me reconsider my preference for Bennett.

It's worth mentioning that he presumably developed this model by backtesting it over the last couple of drafts. As a result, it's going to show pretty good results retroactively, but it doesn't necessarily mean it'll be that predictive going forward. I wonder how many drafts he has backtested his model on. If it's just the 3 he posted, then it gives me much less confidence in his model. If his model holds up for the last 10 drafts or so, then it would be pretty significant.


And he had a good bit of misses in there. Specially in 2011. His top picks seem pretty good though.

As for Davis being twice as good a Beal. We will see.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1092 » by hands11 » Mon May 27, 2013 3:20 am

sfam wrote:Posting for the music...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVCjO-LaZTM[/youtube]


I do see some C Web in him.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1093 » by hands11 » Mon May 27, 2013 3:27 am

BruceO wrote:with the pacers in the finals featuring george and hibbert as some of the most important players. How do you think porter and len would match up against them down the line? would they have the same impact vs other teams?

in other news hoopshype reporting that victor oladipo working out for the wizards against schroeder. Can we have a thread showing player workouts and feedback without their getting lost in draft thread?


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWFZ_iNgRDY[/youtube]

And he already has his own song

Oooooooo. oooooooooo la di ep ooooooooooooo
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,585
And1: 8,810
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1094 » by AFM » Mon May 27, 2013 3:31 am

hands11 wrote:
BruceO wrote:with the pacers in the finals featuring george and hibbert as some of the most important players. How do you think porter and len would match up against them down the line? would they have the same impact vs other teams?

in other news hoopshype reporting that victor oladipo working out for the wizards against schroeder. Can we have a thread showing player workouts and feedback without their getting lost in draft thread?


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWFZ_iNgRDY[/youtube]

And he already has his own song

Oooooooo. oooooooooo la di ep ooooooooooooo

You mean, OLA ODIPO!!!! OLA ODIPO!!!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjd-SXw-we8[/youtube]
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,050
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1095 » by The Consiglieri » Mon May 27, 2013 3:37 am

truwizfan4evr wrote:is there any chance Bennett will be a better overall defender in the pros then in college?


I'd be shocked if he wasn't better. Can't be much worse than he was in college and caches will hold him accountable for at least giving a half effort, and a competent half effort at that.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1096 » by hands11 » Mon May 27, 2013 3:38 am

David West
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2177/david-west

Udonis Haslem
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/i ... nis-haslem

Jackie Carmichael - We can call him the bone crusher. Dude is brick wall. Nice. Wall and Brick Wall.

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Jac ... ael-19449/

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M96Dt5swZq8&feature=player_embedded#![/youtube]


Pegged VO, Otto and CJM and they have all risen to the top.
Tagged Pierre before he was even listed on draftx and now there is rumored he might go in the first.

Now I'm not calling for Jackie to rise like the other. Hell, I didn't see Pierre rising like this. I was hoping we could steal him with a camp invite for nothing. You never know late round or no round players will come into vogue. But Jackie is going to be a good player for the team that grabs him.

Jackie Carmichael. He has slipped from a high of 28th back on 12/20/12 but seems to have settle in around 34 to 37. This guy can play in the league for 10 plus years. Always need a guy like this.

He is exactly who the Wizards need to pick up. Strong in the truck. Good size. Bone crushing picks. Mid range. NBA turnaround move. Post play. Hard worker who keeps improving. Great at communication. Mature.

A lot of the stuff he doesn't do well, I wouldn't want him doing anyway. Only real concern is perimeter D and that something he might be able to improve or they can team defend to cover it up some.
Deeptu McPullup
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 28
Joined: Apr 28, 2013

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1097 » by Deeptu McPullup » Mon May 27, 2013 3:41 am

tontoz wrote:
nate33 wrote:
sfam wrote:If the Cavs take Porter, I doubt Orlando takes Noel, so Noel would probably be the pick.

Orlando fans tend to disagree. They say they would take Noel. There's also a good chance that they trade down a few spots, with someone else moving up to take Noel.

We might have to call Orlando while they're on the clock and work out a pick swap, giving them some modest incentive to do so.


Orlando is just starting their rebuild. They can afford to wait on Noel and tank for next years draft.


People say Orlando goes guard no matter what, but Andrew Nicholson left me with the impression that Huckleberry Hound had grown to 6’9” and developed a sweet jumper. But even there, the release is so slow that he has to fire it off a tripod he keeps in a shoulder bag. They still have big needs up front and Noel complements Big Vuce nicely as MHD noted.

gesa2 wrote:
stevemcqueen1 wrote:Case against Bennett:
- Injured each of the last three years.
- Seems immature, but also seems like a nice kid.
- loses focus in games and makes silly errors on D. Loses his man from watching the ball. Leaves his man to give weakside help too early and too frequently and gives up the open dish. Leaves his feet on shot fakes a lot. Gives up deep position to true bigs.
- Motor is inconsistent, doesn't always run back on D. Doesn't always work to get open, will stand on the perimeter and watch the action when he's tired.
- Doesn't know how to play off the ball. Will post up in spots he can't score from, won't shake his man on the perimeter, waits for the pass to come to him and then tries to create his own shot off the dribble.
- Post game in general is under developed, doesn't have jump hooks.
- Settles for bad shots.
- Columnar build that looks like he carries extra weight in the midsection, probably effects his conditioning.



This is what scares me the most about Bennett, not his D (although that scares me some too). All of his highlight reel stuff is from isolation plays or offensive rebounds. If he can't work off of Wall and Beal, he won't be much good in our starting 5. Very few players are efficient enough as iso scorers to be better than running the offense and getting a good shot that way. Do the people who have seen a lot of him see Bennett as capable of working the pick and roll/pick and pop, handling double teams, swinging the ball to the next spot?


This jumped off the page at me when I watched Bennet as well.

While great with the ball, I think he’d be the rawest 5-on-5 high-usage offensive player we’ve brought in since Nick Young, so I’m not entirely sure what his offensive upside is despite his triple threat prowess, which is admittedly excellent. I'm sure he'll learn faster than Nick here, but he's just starting from a very low base.

If the NBA was a 3-on-3 league, I might take him over Porter and I’m not even being sarcastic. A great option in NBA JAM where he just gets the ball in space every time and goes, but from where I’m sitting, he’s going to have to transform almost all facets of his game to be a plus player on a winning team in the pros. It’s uncertain that he can even execute a role in set plays right now.

I would need to hear a really good explanation for his motor and feel very confident about his intangibles-intelligence beyond that to feel comfortable with him. Without at least average awareness, his offensive potential would be more limited than it looks at first glance.

Dat2U wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
nate33 wrote:This stat geek likes Porter much more than Bennett. He ranks Porter as a very likely to be an all-star caliber player, with Bennett being a hit or miss prospect. Application of his system to the last 3 draft classes have been pretty accurate.


awesome stuff Nate and very intriguing


Wow, looking at his model, Noel & Porter are studs. Interesting stuff.


Yeah, it's not shocking that they'd be so high in a statistical model as Noel and Porter are so efficient, make so many plays that gain you possessions and don't make many mistakes that show up on paper. For example, Porter plays 35 minutes a game but his combined fouls and TOs is only 3.5 a game (.10 TOV%). That's fairly shocking. With Noel, if you add his blocks, assists and steals together and compare it to combined fouls and TOs, it's a 1.8:1 ratio. Again, fairly shocking and you could do this with a number of stats on both guys.

They're just very HI-IQ players who emphasize the sorts of plays that help you win. I was watching Noel versus LSU the other night and when a guard lost the handle on his dribble, Noel was on the floor scrapping for the ball before anyone even realized there was a loose ball (even the guy dribbling it wasn't able to really react before Noel). Just very impressive awareness.
spaceman_E
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,677
And1: 79
Joined: Jun 14, 2006

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1098 » by spaceman_E » Mon May 27, 2013 3:47 am

sfam wrote:Zeller to me looks like a high quality big at the PF position. He is uber athletic, and yeah, seems to have some pretty good moves, even if they don't make a Mcgee ESPN highlight reel. I would guess he has a better career than Len and would take Zeller over Len every time. He can contribute right away and will continue to do so long term. Additionally, Len's ankles scare me.



No, he looks like a guy that D West, Bosh, Duncan and ZBO would come to a fist fight over who gets to demolish him first. Uber athletes... umm, show athleticism at times. Maybe he'll put up 14 and 7 in his prime in the right situation, but ideally he's a good 7th man.
You don't win friends with salad.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,600
And1: 272
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1099 » by WizarDynasty » Mon May 27, 2013 3:50 am

what teh wizards need is a player who can get to the line at will in the 4th quarter and get high percentage shots. Nick Young was allergic to contact. McGee didn't not have strength and he didn't have a quick first step to draw fouls. Seraphin can't even put the ball on the floor and attack the rim for a dunk or draw a foul. Nene has foot issues. Okafor really doesn't have much body control. the only big we have with the ability to draw fouls is Nene and isn't a young spring chicken. Glue guys aren't winning the game in teh fourth quarter. At the end of the day, the more players you have that can draw fouls in the fourth quarter by beating their man with a quick first step, or with raw power in the post, the further you go. A franchise big is alot more important than a glue guy.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official 2013 Draft Thread - Part V 

Post#1100 » by hands11 » Mon May 27, 2013 4:17 am

nate33 wrote:
sfam wrote:If the Cavs take Porter, I doubt Orlando takes Noel, so Noel would probably be the pick.

Orlando fans tend to disagree. They say they would take Noel. There's also a good chance that they trade down a few spots, with someone else moving up to take Noel.

We might have to call Orlando while they're on the clock and work out a pick swap, giving them some modest incentive to do so.


When I looked at their thread a few days ago, they were saying they wanted Burke.

Return to Washington Wizards