Never Wrong wrote:it's just incredibly annoying to be wasting away the rest of melo's prime putting a max money paperweight next to him. ridiculous.
the topic of discussion places bargnani as the 2nd option.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

Never Wrong wrote:it's just incredibly annoying to be wasting away the rest of melo's prime putting a max money paperweight next to him. ridiculous.
Thugger HBC wrote:Never Wrong wrote:it's just incredibly annoying to be wasting away the rest of melo's prime putting a max money paperweight next to him. ridiculous.
the topic of discussion places bargnani as the 2nd option.

Never Wrong wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:Never Wrong wrote:it's just incredibly annoying to be wasting away the rest of melo's prime putting a max money paperweight next to him. ridiculous.
the topic of discussion places bargnani as the 2nd option.
amare's not even the 2nd option. why would bargnani have to come here and take that role? jr/felton will share that. but even then, i'd rather have bargnani be the 2nd option, than the corpse of amare.
Thugger HBC wrote:they both played wore the same amount of suits the past two years, neither defends or rebounds.
same overpaid players to me only one is two years younger.

Never Wrong wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:they both played wore the same amount of suits the past two years, neither defends or rebounds.
same overpaid players to me only one is two years younger.
not even close to the same and amare's contract is infinitely worse. bargnani it's possible he can get healthier (more than possible, actually) eventually. amare we know can't. there's no argument for amare vs. any player at this point. toronto hasn't even been actively trying to win. they're not taking risks with any players they're trying to trade. so if he gets a papercut, bam, inactive list. nobody wants to trade for amare. toronto might not get a ton of offers they like for bargnani, but i bet they get offers. nobody's calling about amare.
Thugger HBC wrote:Never Wrong wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:they both played wore the same amount of suits the past two years, neither defends or rebounds.
same overpaid players to me only one is two years younger.
not even close to the same and amare's contract is infinitely worse. bargnani it's possible he can get healthier (more than possible, actually) eventually. amare we know can't. there's no argument for amare vs. any player at this point. toronto hasn't even been actively trying to win. they're not taking risks with any players they're trying to trade. so if he gets a papercut, bam, inactive list. nobody wants to trade for amare. toronto might not get a ton of offers they like for bargnani, but i bet they get offers. nobody's calling about amare.
they are calling for bargnani either, they been trying to move him for over 3 years.
Never Wrong wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:Never Wrong wrote:not even close to the same and amare's contract is infinitely worse. bargnani it's possible he can get healthier (more than possible, actually) eventually. amare we know can't. there's no argument for amare vs. any player at this point. toronto hasn't even been actively trying to win. they're not taking risks with any players they're trying to trade. so if he gets a papercut, bam, inactive list. nobody wants to trade for amare. toronto might not get a ton of offers they like for bargnani, but i bet they get offers. nobody's calling about amare.
they are calling for bargnani either, they been trying to move him for over 3 years.
i bet they've turned down offers at some point. if they really wanted to move him by any means necessary, he'd be moved. i guarantee he gets traded this year if that new gm really doesn't want him there.
nykballa2k4 wrote:It was known that Bulls had an interest in Boozer for Bargs + during the season. People wanted Bargs, but only wanted him when they were giving up a worse contract. You say no one is calling for Amare. I bet you Bobcats offered something with Tyrus Thomas for him. I promise you every horrible long contract was offered for amare. I also would not be shocked to see a Gerald Wallace + someone for Amare offer this summer.
StephNYKurry wrote:Wouldn't mind some of this at all, but no Amare (can't believe I just said that)
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjI2ivSn4jM[/youtube]
Never Wrong wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:It was known that Bulls had an interest in Boozer for Bargs + during the season. People wanted Bargs, but only wanted him when they were giving up a worse contract. You say no one is calling for Amare. I bet you Bobcats offered something with Tyrus Thomas for him. I promise you every horrible long contract was offered for amare. I also would not be shocked to see a Gerald Wallace + someone for Amare offer this summer.
nobody is calling for amare. period. there is no contract remotely close to as bad as amare's. so no, your scenario there would never happen. no one is calling for him. nobody will call for him in the future. and nobody has called for him. he's greg oden at this point. only the kicker is he makes max money. no one's even going after oden with a minimum deal. like i said and i can't be more clear, amare has NEGATIVE value. we have to pay a team just to take him away from us.

GettinitDone wrote:Putting Bargnani on floor forces him out of the paint to defend him and tralallaa the paint is free for us to go in.
nykballa2k4 wrote:Do you have any sources for ANY of your thoughts there?
I honestly believe Billy King has called Grunnie already this summer and asked him about an Amare for Humphries and Wallace swap. I also guarantee you that Raptors would seriously consider offering a deal of Fields and Bargnani for Amare (if they didn't feel content eating $ by amnestying bargs).
You saying Amare is untradeable only means you believe he has the worst contract in the NBA and furthermore is the worst 19 million dollars/year spent by any team over the next 2 years.
Amare's contract will, of course, have high value in 1 year when he is an expiring contract.


mrpoetryNmotion wrote:Wow... 20 page thread on Andrea Bargnani. Don't see that everyday.
