ImageImageImageImageImage

LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#61 » by dockingsched » Sat Jun 8, 2013 10:02 pm

Marionettetc wrote:More skilled? Absolutely not. It took him 8 years to start playing defense and hit free throws (if you want to argue that he currently can). Lebron also was the focal point of a bad team for most of his career, which has been played post hand checking rules.

More physically gifted? Sure, but that doesn't count for anything if you can't produce, and doesn't reflect who's "better". Kobe is also a better rebounder relative to his position and size.

3 Rings from now we can start talking about how he compares to Kobe. Just like we could only start really comparing Kobe to Jordan when he won his fifth.


the yr before lebron got on the cavs, they won 17 games. he doubled their win total to 35. his second season they were a winning team at 42-40. after that he's been on nothing but 50+ win teams.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#62 » by dockingsched » Sat Jun 8, 2013 10:03 pm

Imadogg wrote:Don't really wanna get involved in this stupid debate with so many stupid arguments being thrown around, it's useless since some people are or act too stupid to stay consistent in regards to their arguments and viewpoints.

Kobe wins with Shaq (the most dominant force in the league), it's "Kobe was just as important as Shaq".
Lebron (the most dominant force in the league) wins with Wade/Bosh, it's "Lebron has Wade/Bosh, he doesn't lead the team, blah blah". First of all, Bosh... thanks. 2nd, Lebron is playing the Shaq role here, Finals MVP, who cares if he had Wade, we don't take rings away from Kobe for being with Shaq like idiot Lakers haters do.

If you bring up Lebron having better assist/reb numbers, it's ast because he handles the ball always and dudes are just set up perfectly for 3s and they make them cuz they can, he doesn't make anyone better. For reb, well duh he's bigger so he should get more. No one brings up that Lebron's points are up there with Kobe's, but if they did, it would be because he handles the ball all the time. Lebron is more efficient because he is bigger and faster and takes better shots and Wade takes away pressure from him. Lol ok. And in the end, stats don't matter because Kobe makes teammates better and has killer instinct and 5 rings. But come back to me when I wanna talk about Kobe scoring 81 which Lebron can't dream of, cuz suddenly, stats matter.

Lebron is so passive, he didn't take over the game! Kobe would have shot over 3 guys and made it, instead of passing it to a wide open 3 shooter. Kobe has that intensity, that killer attitude. Lebron lost 2 finals being passive he sucks. Forget that Kobe shot the Lakers out of one with his horrible ballhogging and his killer instinct didn't do **** for the other.

Loled at Kobe/Shaq were equal in 2001/2002 playoffs, unless you count the finals, which shouldn't count because the West was the real finals. Yes, lets not count THE NBA FINALS.

So much more but I don't wanna go through every post again. Certain arguments can be debated for either side, but you look like a **** idiot if you have double standards and use one example for yourself and refuse that same example for the other side.


excellent post.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#63 » by Kilroy » Sat Jun 8, 2013 10:34 pm

Not sure what's more annoying, the Kobe homers, or the "Kobe ain't all dat" crowd trying to convince a Kobe homers on a Lakers forum that Kobe ain't all dat...

Wearin' that "I'm a Lakers fan, but not a Kobe fan" badge right the hell out...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
User avatar
stunnar0b
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 121
Joined: Feb 10, 2010
Location: JUST OG

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#64 » by stunnar0b » Sat Jun 8, 2013 10:42 pm

what are poeple arguing about, sure james has his flaws but ultimately when its all said and done he'll go down as a top 5 talent all-time and if he piles up some consecutive rings he could go down as the goat imo.

with that said GO SPURS!
User avatar
Marionettetc
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,779
And1: 969
Joined: Jun 26, 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
   

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#65 » by Marionettetc » Sat Jun 8, 2013 10:45 pm

dockingsched wrote:
Marionettetc wrote:More skilled? Absolutely not. It took him 8 years to start playing defense and hit free throws (if you want to argue that he currently can). Lebron also was the focal point of a bad team for most of his career, which has been played post hand checking rules.

More physically gifted? Sure, but that doesn't count for anything if you can't produce, and doesn't reflect who's "better". Kobe is also a better rebounder relative to his position and size.

3 Rings from now we can start talking about how he compares to Kobe. Just like we could only start really comparing Kobe to Jordan when he won his fifth.


the yr before lebron got on the cavs, they won 17 games. he doubled their win total to 35. his second season they were a winning team at 42-40. after that he's been on nothing but 50+ win teams.


I should have clarified, in terms of talent his Cleveland teams were absolute garbage. Any success they had after his arrival was his own doing. I'm not even hating on Lebron, I think he's a phenomenal player. I just think it's premature to compare him to a Legend who has been doing his thing and winning for 17 seasons.

It's also fair to point out that during the team he was on Cleveland, the east was extremely weak overall. I think playing in a weak conference, on a bad team where you're 99% of the talent (Mo Williams and Ilgauskas were their standouts while he was on the team) and you have the ball in your hands for most of the game helps produce numbers. And again, I'm not saying he's trash, just that there are a lot of things to take into account comparing players who played in different eras, on different teams, at different positions and etc etc.

The comparing stuff is better left to when their respective careers are finished.
User avatar
JellosJigglin
RealGM
Posts: 15,506
And1: 9,541
Joined: Jul 14, 2004

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#66 » by JellosJigglin » Sun Jun 9, 2013 1:19 am

Imadogg wrote:Don't really wanna get involved in this stupid debate with so many stupid arguments being thrown around, it's useless since some people are or act too stupid to stay consistent in regards to their arguments and viewpoints.

Kobe wins with Shaq (the most dominant force in the league), it's "Kobe was just as important as Shaq".
Lebron (the most dominant force in the league) wins with Wade/Bosh, it's "Lebron has Wade/Bosh, he doesn't lead the team, blah blah". First of all, Bosh... thanks. 2nd, Lebron is playing the Shaq role here, Finals MVP, who cares if he had Wade, we don't take rings away from Kobe for being with Shaq like idiot Lakers haters do.

If you bring up Lebron having better assist/reb numbers, it's ast because he handles the ball always and dudes are just set up perfectly for 3s and they make them cuz they can, he doesn't make anyone better. For reb, well duh he's bigger so he should get more. No one brings up that Lebron's points are up there with Kobe's, but if they did, it would be because he handles the ball all the time. Lebron is more efficient because he is bigger and faster and takes better shots and Wade takes away pressure from him. Lol ok. And in the end, stats don't matter because Kobe makes teammates better and has killer instinct and 5 rings. But come back to me when I wanna talk about Kobe scoring 81 which Lebron can't dream of, cuz suddenly, stats matter.

Lebron is so passive, he didn't take over the game! Kobe would have shot over 3 guys and made it, instead of passing it to a wide open 3 shooter. Kobe has that intensity, that killer attitude. Lebron lost 2 finals being passive he sucks. Forget that Kobe shot the Lakers out of one with his horrible ballhogging and his killer instinct didn't do **** for the other.

Loled at Kobe/Shaq were equal in 2001/2002 playoffs, unless you count the finals, which shouldn't count because the West was the real finals. Yes, lets not count THE NBA FINALS.

So much more but I don't wanna go through every post again. Certain arguments can be debated for either side, but you look like a **** idiot if you have double standards and use one example for yourself and refuse that same example for the other side.


The Kobe vs Lebron debate is a compelling one for many reasons. There are layers upon layers that can be analyzed when comparing these two greats. However, if you strip away each one of these layers - stats, rings, eras, teammates, individual awards, consistency, etc etc - like the peels of an onion, and get down to the core of the matter, this is what I believe the argument comes down to:

1. LEBRON: Everything that makes Lebron great can be quantified on a stat sheet. We are in awe at the things he can do physically. His game is tangible in a sense. For example, you know he's great because you can see him run across the court faster than anyone else, even at 260 pounds. You can see defenders bounce off him when he puts his head down and attacks the paint. You can see him stay in front of players at multiple positions. His talent is external. It's visual. It can be measured in seconds, inches, in points, assists, rebounds, etc.

2. KOBE: what makes Kobe great can NOT be measured on a stat sheet. He attained greatness because of a burning passion from within. He was a gifted athlete, but was never the best at any of the common physical traits. Never the biggest. Never the strongest. Never the fastest. Never the most explosive. Average sized hands. There is just something so organic about his talent that connects to and inspires the everyday man. He's the prime example of what you can achieve with a laser focus and a work ethic that's unmatched. He will leave this game knowing he reached the highest level he could.

The discussion will never be without the stats, rings, etc. if that ever happened, we would quickly realize that what it really comes down to is which player we connect with more. Is it the man with Superman powers, flying across the court and making us imagine the limits of the human body? Or is it Batman, the underdog with a bottomless bag of tools and a cunning wit.

I think of Lebron as Ivan Drago, in the gym with the best training equipment and the worlds best scientists measuring his punching power and building him up like a machine by any means necessary. Kobe is like Rocky, lifting tree trunks in waist high snow, chopping wood with an axe, punching frozen meat as punching bags and running up the highest mountain within sight.

I just don't like how everything seemed to come easy to Lebron, from high school all the way to present. He had a sense of entitlement even way before he had ever done anything to deserve it. Kobe had to earn his stripes from day one. He was schooling pros while he was in high school and still couldn't even start for his team after he was drafted. That wouldn't happen today, but that was the reality back then. He had to earn it first, and even then he had to do it over and over again until they trusted him.

I'm the son of immigrants, so hard work and determination were burned into my psyche from a young age. That's what I respect and that's what I relate to. That's why Kobe is my guy and always will be over Lebron. He may not have the stats, but dammit he ran to the top of that mountain 5 times. it wasn't because he had blazing speed or a chiseled body that plowed through foes, it was because he just wanted it more than anyone else. I like to believe that I can take something from that and apply it to my own life. And that's all I have to say about that.
ballaholick
Rookie
Posts: 1,215
And1: 93
Joined: Dec 19, 2012

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#67 » by ballaholick » Sun Jun 9, 2013 3:07 am

dockingsched wrote:
Marionettetc wrote:More skilled? Absolutely not. It took him 8 years to start playing defense and hit free throws (if you want to argue that he currently can). Lebron also was the focal point of a bad team for most of his career, which has been played post hand checking rules.

More physically gifted? Sure, but that doesn't count for anything if you can't produce, and doesn't reflect who's "better". Kobe is also a better rebounder relative to his position and size.

3 Rings from now we can start talking about how he compares to Kobe. Just like we could only start really comparing Kobe to Jordan when he won his fifth.


the yr before lebron got on the cavs, they won 17 games. he doubled their win total to 35. his second season they were a winning team at 42-40. after that he's been on nothing but 50+ win teams.


In the East
twentyfour
Ballboy
Posts: 10
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 08, 2013

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#68 » by twentyfour » Sun Jun 9, 2013 8:46 am

ballaholick wrote:
dockingsched wrote:
Marionettetc wrote:More skilled? Absolutely not. It took him 8 years to start playing defense and hit free throws (if you want to argue that he currently can). Lebron also was the focal point of a bad team for most of his career, which has been played post hand checking rules.

More physically gifted? Sure, but that doesn't count for anything if you can't produce, and doesn't reflect who's "better". Kobe is also a better rebounder relative to his position and size.

3 Rings from now we can start talking about how he compares to Kobe. Just like we could only start really comparing Kobe to Jordan when he won his fifth.


the yr before lebron got on the cavs, they won 17 games. he doubled their win total to 35. his second season they were a winning team at 42-40. after that he's been on nothing but 50+ win teams.


In the East


AND it's not like Cleveland didn't bring in more help each year to accommodate lebron.
User avatar
Speedlot
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,164
And1: 720
Joined: Jan 01, 2007
         

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#69 » by Speedlot » Sun Jun 9, 2013 11:18 am

You can't eclipse Jordan on realgm. His nick should be STATS. Because advance stats is based off him, catered to him. His play is AIR, cus he's a high flying exciting machine. His persona is swagger, because he has a "killer" mentality. He has no faults. He can never fail. Yawn

For some reason people forget Jordan's stats aren't the best. His flying isn't the best. And his killer mentality certainly is overrated. Who quits 2 years to play with a wooden stick? (inb4hewasbannedbysternoritalianmafia)

His biggest rival team was the Pistons, and they stomped him for a good while. When Jordan finally got his prime team though, what was left? A couple of "best" defense of all time teams? Did any of those teams rival what Celtics and Lakers had? Did the 2004 pistons show anything worthwhile? They won 1 year, against "kobe" who goes from 13 to 11 on the all time list on realgm after winning 2 titles with finals mvp. Lebron wins 1 and he goes to 11. 2 and he goes to 5. I'm dying here. Duncan wins 4 and he's at 9. And his potential 5th out of his prime and he goes to 3. ROFL

Let's not. Please let's not bring Jordan into this. Similarly when people bring Wilt VS Shaq, NOBODY brings up omg STATS of Wilt. Mainly cus of the modern era vs old era. This logic is comical, because that really justifies you can't really compare different eras. Jordan played in a different ERA. Jordan fought against good defense? If jordan played against Magic and Bird I would be impressed to be honest. But in reality he didn't. He only defeated Magic and/or bird after they have fallen out of their prime. That's the truth, and in reality that's what Lebron is doing to Kobe right now also. Kobe has been declining for a while now. He did not beat Kobe at his best. He had a chance. But lost against kobe's 2nd fiddle. Dwightmare Howard. He couldn't BEAT d12. And nobody would argue that Orlando had a better team at the time. LOLMATCHUPs.

His stats are nice sure. People like 38-8-7(Lebron) over 35-5-5(kobe), because they argue that 48%fg is better than 45%fg (smaller even with 57%ts vs 56%ts but I digress) But why when you compare 30-8-7 on 48% vs 28-12-4 (player C)on 59%fg (57ts vs 67%ts) what happens ? Which statline is better?

Oh the excuses goes away. Suddenly stats isn't that important anymore. Lebron gets the benefit of the doubt for some reason.

LeBron is certainly good. His biggest rival was Dwayne Wade. He smashed that possibility when he joined his team though. Smart move really. Now he has Durant. An offensive juggernaut who's growing. How he deals with Durant will determine his legacy. Does he have a chance to top the all time list? Sure, why not. But we have to let things play out. Does he stand out compared to the rest? Let's see what he does that puts him above the rest. His stats are INSANE right now, but it has to come with winning. Wilt's stats were insane until it mattered more often than not.

Honestly I feel if Duncan takes a crap on Lebron again this finals, Lebron will NEVER be able to be on top of Duncan. That's more of an ALL time argument to me more than anything. I can never put Wilt above Russel, because of the thrashing he did to Wilt and his team.

Kobe's accomplishment is his 5 titles. The first 3 people try to disregard, but it is PROVEN that Kobe is a number 1 type player, when he won 2 on his own. This is a fact. Do not deny this. Kobe was a superstar. He was not Robert Horry, so the argument people have against him is silly. Finals MvP is merely a title gained in one series. Kobe was the MvP against the Spurs. The 2nd best team in the league. But of course no credit given. People argue that Kobe wouldn't have won without shaq but he did.
Yet Shaq did NOT accomplish anything without Kobe. He won with Wade, but harhar since he didn't win FMVP he didn't do jack right?
Duncan winning titles without FMVP let's him jump into top 5 while kobe moves 1 position while winning the FMVP twice. Strange world.

I digressed enough.
LeBron needs more titles. But if Lebron wins 5, Wade has 6. What nao. I honestly feel Lebron neeeds to leave Miami to ever get over Kobe on the all time list.
dynamic duo
Analyst
Posts: 3,676
And1: 10,486
Joined: May 01, 2013

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#70 » by dynamic duo » Sun Jun 9, 2013 12:16 pm

4 time MVP at age 28, nuff said, he needs to win it all this year though.
User avatar
BEazy
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 2,497
Joined: Aug 06, 2010
     

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#71 » by BEazy » Mon Jun 10, 2013 3:01 am

Not to brag or anything but 5 time NBA champion and 2 Finals MVP (The real MVP award). Nuff said.

3 straight titles to 2 straight titles. Only person to reach a level of dominance since MJ.

Hey, I grew up watching the guy so I have a little Kobe homer in me.
Image

Long Live The Black Mamba. Kobe Bean Bryant Laker For Life. 8/24
User avatar
TruSkool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,706
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
 

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#72 » by TruSkool » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:38 am

kobe's offensive game was only 2nd (if that) to jordan.

the way lebron is a better player than kobe is because he is unselfish, and makes players around him better. perhaps his bball iq is superior to kobe's, but people may not want to admit that. But when it comes to talent with the ball in their hands, kobe is just a deadlier option.
User avatar
Wavy Q
RealGM
Posts: 24,317
And1: 2,390
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Location: Pull Up
     

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#73 » by Wavy Q » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:33 am

this thread has officially given me cancer
User avatar
EArl
RealGM
Posts: 49,975
And1: 13,473
Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Columbus
   

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#74 » by EArl » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:38 am

Stephano wrote:this thread has officially given me cancer

In before Image
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: LA Times: Lebron James on verge of eclipsing kobe 

Post#75 » by Kilroy » Mon Jun 10, 2013 3:25 pm

Before ^ this happens...
I don't see anywhere it goes from here, but annoying-er...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...

Return to Los Angeles Lakers