sfam wrote:nate33 wrote:^
But the Cavs want Porter and he won't last past us. I think Cleveland has to call us if they want to trade down.
It's a game of chicken. Cleveland wants Porter but doesn't really want to take him at #1. Orlando won't trade up because they're just as happy with McLemore as they are with Noel. It doesn't bother us much if Cleveland drafts Noel because we'll end up with Porter. The only thing that scares us if if Cleveland actually drafts Porter, leaving Orlando to draft Noel.
So what do we do if Cleveland demands a future 1st from us to move up to #1. If we don't, they'll threaten to go ahead and draft Porter and leave us with the nightmare scenario of having neither Noel or Porter on the board.
Do we consider Noel to be so much better of an option than Bennett that's it's worth sacrificing a future 1st? (I'd definitely give up the #38, I'm just conflicted about giving up anything more.)
Cleveland trading down only works if they have two players they are equally OK with. I wouldn't be surprised if the Cavs would be happy with Olapido as much as Porter. Olapido shows up really well on the analytics, so its not out of the realm of possibility. This would give them a great 3 guard rotation. Waiters could play with Olapido just fine. If this is the case, they would be more worried that the Suns or Bobcats want someone other than Olapido - most likely Noel or Mclemore.
EDIT: And no, in this draft, we definitely don't give up a first. We find 3 players we are OK with drafting and pick according to our board.
And for the record, there is no nightmare scenario for us or Cleveland. From every kernel of information that's been dug up in the past several months, it sounds pretty clear that Cleveland and Washington have fairly similar boards with possibly only one major difference that being Oladipo high up there in Cleveland, while Bennett is the one high up there with us. Cleveland's board sounds like it involves Noel, Len, and Porter, w/Oladipo recently added, while we appear to be focused on Noel, Porter, Bennett and Len. For all the nightmare talk, and what we'd do talk, we're a team that leaks a ton, and considering the word of mouth about our interests in Porter, Noel, Len and Bennett, I think it's pretty clear what the team is interested in doing, and what it isn't interested in doing (there is no evidence to speak of regarding an interest in either Oladipo or Zeller).
I don't think Cleveland's really afraid of anything at all, they really like at least 3 or 4 guys, I think their chief concern is how the final board is going to look and whether or not its worthwhile to drop a few slots, and get one of the later guys on their board in exchange for a very minor return, if there is even any interest to begin with. I would agree that if any team is interested in moving up, its one of Charlotte, Phoenix, or New Orleans. Washington and Orlando are perfectly fine w/the 2 and 3 slot, and that's basically why I don't believe a trade down is going to happen. Can Cleveland afford to deal down to 5 or 6? I don't see how. The guys they like almost certainly will be gone. They could deal down to 4 but I don't sense Charlotte being interested in moving up to #1. Like Phoenix and Orlando, Charlotte knows they'll finish bottom 3-5 again next year, in an infinitely better draft, and they have needs all over the place, any of which can be dealt with perfectly effectively at #4 (likely players available will be 3 of the 4 among Bennett/Oladipo/McLemore/Len).
A trade may happen, but I can't see why any of these teams would pull the trigger with Cleveland, or why Cleveland would do so with them. At the end of the day everybody's happy w/what they've got save for Minnesota several slots down the board from them, and Minny doesn't have the pieces in place to make the deal worthwhile to anybody.