Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Aaaaaaaand sigged
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Howard Cosell wrote:Sam AmicoAlso, according to those within organization, Cavs lukewarm on Victor Oladipo or Anthony Bennett at #1, going back & forth on Noel/McLemore.
The Cavs are trading out. Who can give them more? Suns with 3 + 30 + who?

Sam Amico @SamAmicoFSO 3h
Source adds that Cavs have talked to one team in particular a couple times about No. 1 pick, but it's exploratory only at this stage.
Sam Amico Sam Amico @SamAmicoFSO 3h
Cavs have been working on "something major," says source. But no details given due to the magnitude.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Esohny wrote:Are there a lot of pauses in it?
Krapinsky wrote:Versajao + #1 for Williams, Ridnour, Shved #9
Rubio/Barea
Oladipo/MLE/Lee
AK/Bud/#26
Love/Cunningham
Pek/Verajao/Johnson
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
Esohny wrote:Are there a lot of pauses in it? That's not fun. Also, I hope they don't try to ram a moral down our throat, I'd prefer that the story was an allegory. It's more subtle. In addition to that, I think it would be cool if Paul Hogan was a character in the story.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
shrink wrote:spree8 wrote:Varejao .. a top 3 rebounder in the league
What year was that? What I see is a guy that's been overpaid for his contribution three straight years.
2012-13 361 RB, 96th in NBA,
2011-12 287 RB, 94th in NBA,
2010-11 301 RB, 123rd in NBA
2009-10 578 RB, 36th in NBA
2008-09 581 RB, 33rd in NBA
2007-08 399 RB, 81st in NBA
2006-07 545 RB, 37th in NBA
2005-06 235 RB, 175th in NBA
2004-05 257 RB, 151st in NBA
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:I'd love to know how many times Pek can do 185. I'll say 140 times.
GopherIt! wrote:Devilzsidewalk wrote:I'd love to know how many times Pek can do 185. I'll say 140 times.
140 with impecable form.

Devilzsidewalk wrote:GopherIt! wrote:Devilzsidewalk wrote:I'd love to know how many times Pek can do 185. I'll say 140 times.
140 with impecable form.
or perhaps.....impekable form?
[RCG] wrote:Cavaliers have cap-space, don't they? Couldn't they absorb our players?
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
shrink wrote:[RCG] wrote:Cavaliers have cap-space, don't they? Couldn't they absorb our players?
They will have cap space, but two weeks after the draft.
With the media and marketing surrounding a #1 pick, I can't see a handshake deal holding up. It's the same reason that using sign-and-trades are unlikely.
shrink wrote:I just want to point out that Varejao is a negative contract
tranjSAIC wrote:shrink wrote:I just want to point out that Varejao is a negative contract
Don't tell that to Cav fans, I think they expect to get a lotto pick or something crazy for Varejao.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
horaceworthy wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Versajao + #1 for Williams, Ridnour, Shved #9
Rubio/Barea
Oladipo/MLE/Lee
AK/Bud/#26
Love/Cunningham
Pek/Verajao/Johnson
I see the massive injury issues with AV, but to me this is kind of like Williams/9 for Afflalo/2 that gets floated out now and then. NBA teams aren't always renowned for their common sense, but it's tough for me to see trades where there's a solid argument the Wolves are upgrading the current roster and getting the better pick going down.
Still, that's definitely a trade I could get behind. I like KCP enough that I'm not all that desperate for the Wolves to trade up, but a Pek/Love/Oladipo/Rubio core would be sick, and a healthy AK, AV, Bud and even Barea is a nice veteran supporting cast with playoff experience.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves