ImageImageImage

Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
TommyPoints
General Manager
Posts: 7,559
And1: 4,250
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Spurs of the East
 

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#501 » by TommyPoints » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:04 pm

The Clippers are taking a beating on ESPN over this.
Image
User avatar
Marley2Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 11,886
And1: 2,696
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
     

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#502 » by Marley2Hendrix » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:12 pm

15th overall wrote:
StojkoVrankovic wrote:Jackie Mac just said on Around the Horn that "according to her sources" Doc is prepared to come back and coach

What a dick.


Probably the same sources who told her the number 1 goal of the off-season was to trade for Millsap.
You gotta make it sexy! Hips and nips, otherwise I'm not eating.
The Corey's
RealGM
Posts: 12,793
And1: 8,579
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#503 » by The Corey's » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:14 pm

Doc will never recover from this. Not unless he comes back, actually sticks it out and wins another championship. I'm ok with him coming back. Simply to preserve his contract status and in line of keeping the possibility of compensation.

That said. He isn't coming back.
User avatar
BigTrade92
General Manager
Posts: 9,400
And1: 11,061
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
       

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#504 » by BigTrade92 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:15 pm

mapko81 wrote:
Rondo To KG wrote:
andy582 wrote:At this point, the best-case for the Clippers is:

Pierce gets bought out, we amnesty Garnett, release Doc-
Both sign with LA, as does Doc.


Pretty sure we can't amnesty Garnett because his contract came after the lockout.

Also, I couldn't be happier that Ainge held his ground and refused to take back negative value for Garnett. I would much rather see Garnett and Pierce retire as Celtics rather than receive a late first rounder and an overpaid Jordan.

Maybe you guys think that DJ is overpaid, but that's not a view around the league... a lot of teams would be more than happy to take that contract off of LACs hands. Maybe you are spoiled having KG playing C at a hometown discount, but Cs like DJ are hard to find in the league. He would easily get a $10 mill per year offer if he was a FA this summer.


Cool? Should we care? We still don't want him unless we're either shedding salary or getting Bledsoe as well.

You Clips fans keep trying to convince us that we missed an opportunity on a good deal, but any knowledgable basketball fan can see that it's quite the opposite. Give it a rest please.
soxfan2003
RealGM
Posts: 11,944
And1: 4,257
Joined: May 30, 2003
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#505 » by soxfan2003 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:15 pm

mapko81 wrote:
Rondo To KG wrote:
andy582 wrote:At this point, the best-case for the Clippers is:

Pierce gets bought out, we amnesty Garnett, release Doc-
Both sign with LA, as does Doc.


Pretty sure we can't amnesty Garnett because his contract came after the lockout.

Also, I couldn't be happier that Ainge held his ground and refused to take back negative value for Garnett. I would much rather see Garnett and Pierce retire as Celtics rather than receive a late first rounder and an overpaid Jordan.

Maybe you guys think that DJ is overpaid, but that's not a view around the league... a lot of teams would be more than happy to take that contract off of LACs hands. Maybe you are spoiled having KG playing C at a hometown discount, but Cs like DJ are hard to find in the league. He would easily get a $10 mill per year offer if he was a FA this summer.


By who after that playoff performance? It just would no longer happen with a lot of teams wanting to sign him to a 2 year 21.5 million dollar contract. A mediocre team may give him a 2 year 16 million dollar deal to see if he improves under their coaching but besides that I just don't even see the bad teams giving him much money. What is their incentive when they can just take a gamble on a couple of bigs from overseas and hope one of them pays off.

Jordan has just given very strong indications he is not worth the money. It says a lot when his own coach wanted him traded. Coaches normally don't requests trades of players like that but he was saying our team can't win with him as our starting center.
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#506 » by Edug27 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:17 pm

mapko81 wrote:Maybe you guys think that DJ is overpaid, but that's not a view around the league... a lot of teams would be more than happy to take that contract off of LACs hands. Maybe you are spoiled having KG playing C at a hometown discount, but Cs like DJ are hard to find in the league. He would easily get a $10 mill per year offer if he was a FA this summer.


Agreed to a certain extent. We are underrating Jordan. I mean, we NEED a big center badly, and may be stuck with Wilcox and J.Collins again next season. But we also have the option of keeping KG. Gamble? Sure. But I'm still taking KG over Jordan any day.

Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't? Is Blake that good? I don't know, but I don't see how this deal automatically makes the Clips a title contender. Might be better for them to not have done this deal in the long run.
User avatar
SuperDeluxe
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,009
And1: 23,834
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#507 » by SuperDeluxe » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:24 pm

Edug27 wrote:Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't?

Good point. I'd give the Clippers the edge, no question about it in my mind... but when you think about it the difference is not that big.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#508 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:25 pm

mapko81 wrote:Maybe you guys think that DJ is overpaid, but that's not a view around the league... a lot of teams would be more than happy to take that contract off of LACs hands. Maybe you are spoiled having KG playing C at a hometown discount, but Cs like DJ are hard to find in the league. He would easily get a $10 mill per year offer if he was a FA this summer.


That's not my understanding at all.
User avatar
ermocrate
General Manager
Posts: 9,622
And1: 1,623
Joined: Apr 19, 2001
Location: Roma
Contact:
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#509 » by ermocrate » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:28 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't?

Good point. I'd give the Clippers the edge, no question about it in my mind... but when you think about it the difference is not that big.

I agree, plus we have room to operate...
"Negativity in this town sucks"
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#510 » by Banks2Pierce » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 pm

Comparing him with Steamer is a little too dramatic. Jordan is a constant rim threat. The guy's max reach is 12+ feet and he's a constant rim threat once the pg gets past halfcourt. I still don't like his defense that much, but he improved to a serviceable level recently. Has decent numbers in postups and vs. the pick and roll. Also a good rebounder.

I wouldn't be THAT surprised if we called them back and caved on their latest demand.
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#511 » by Banks2Pierce » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:36 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't?

Good point. I'd give the Clippers the edge, no question about it in my mind... but when you think about it the difference is not that big.



CP3's a legitimate MVP candidate and affects ORtg as much as KG affects DRtg. Griffin's also a stud and better than our best player.

Should also be said that we were closer to winning it last year than people realize and that our start to the season probably doesn't accurately reflect what we would've been with Rondo in the playoffs this season.
User avatar
AKFO
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,308
And1: 1,736
Joined: May 24, 2012
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#512 » by AKFO » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:36 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't?

Good point. I'd give the Clippers the edge, no question about it in my mind... but when you think about it the difference is not that big.

I'd still love to run it back. Go get Gortat and/or Millsap and let's go to work.
Image
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,164
And1: 14,714
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#513 » by Marvel » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:41 pm

Clippers are a joke.

Hey, guess what their plan B is? Lionel Hollins.
User avatar
AKFO
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,308
And1: 1,736
Joined: May 24, 2012
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#514 » by AKFO » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:43 pm

Marvel wrote:Clippers are a joke.

Hey, guess what their plan B is? Lionel Hollins.

Lionel and Doc do look a bit alike. Maybe they can sell it
Image
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 8,205
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#515 » by Edug27 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:47 pm

Banks2Pierce wrote:
SuperDeluxe wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't?

Good point. I'd give the Clippers the edge, no question about it in my mind... but when you think about it the difference is not that big.



CP3's a legitimate MVP candidate and affects ORtg as much as KG affects DRtg. Griffin's also a stud and better than our best player.

Should also be said that we were closer to winning it last year than people realize and that our start to the season probably doesn't accurately reflect what we would've been with Rondo in the playoffs this season.


I don't know about Griffin being better than a healthy Rondo. Rondo can single handily win you games in the playoffs .... Rondo can dominate a game in all areas, much like Lebron does. Griffin is not that kind of player.
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,164
And1: 14,714
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#516 » by Marvel » Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:03 pm

Did the Clippers know that they would be getting Pierce in a roundabout way through this deal?

I can't believe they would turn down KG, Terry/Lee, opportunity to have Pierce, Doc for DJ and 2 1st rounders.
User avatar
calamity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,812
And1: 55
Joined: Jul 04, 2009

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#517 » by calamity » Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:11 pm

was doc intending get a good asst coach in this endeavor? his track record proves he does best with a great asst coach, but if they were willing to pay him the same rate I doubt it. The main difference for Doc in coaching the Celtics or Clippers is that one will be actively rebuilding while the other will be pretending to contend is what looks like a short 1 year window granted if KG is mostly healthy during the season.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,098
And1: 14,946
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#518 » by jfs1000d » Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:12 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't?

Good point. I'd give the Clippers the edge, no question about it in my mind... but when you think about it the difference is not that big.


CP3 is better than Rondo, a better scorer, and Blake is an All-Star PF who can rebound and finish. If we had Cp3s scoring this year and Blake scoring and rebounding instead of Avery Bradley and Bass, we probably end up in finals.

Let's not underestimate Griffin now.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#519 » by chrisab123 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:16 pm

Hmm well if we keep Doc...and CP3 really wants to play with Doc and KG...Rondo isn't that expensive...I think you can appreciate where I'm going with this :lol:

If Paul wants to leave and the Clippers know they are going to lose him...might not be an awful move.
User avatar
calamity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,812
And1: 55
Joined: Jul 04, 2009

Re: Celtics and Clippers Deal #2 UPDATE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD 

Post#520 » by calamity » Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:16 pm

jfs1000d wrote:
SuperDeluxe wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Also, how is CP/Pierce/Blake/KG a contender, when Rondo/Pierce/Green/KG isn't?

Good point. I'd give the Clippers the edge, no question about it in my mind... but when you think about it the difference is not that big.


CP3 is better than Rondo, a better scorer, and Blake is an All-Star PF who can rebound and finish. If we had Cp3s scoring this year and Blake scoring and rebounding instead of Avery Bradley and Bass, we probably end up in finals.

Let's not underestimate Griffin now.


yet the team has been mediocre in the postseason besides that. if they think doc is the answer then I wish the best to them.

Return to Boston Celtics