princeofpalace wrote:ChipButty wrote:
Probably a valid point. We've just seen Duncan and Hibbert subbed out during crunch time b/c they are too slow to guard on the perimeter.
Zeller's 8'10 standing reach (Same as or better than Love and Griffin) is fine at PF.
I've been fine with Zeller as an option at #8 for months. I'd also get on the phone with Indiana and see what they are willing to offer for him. Given that he's a hometown favorite and West is a FA, they have to interested. I'd start with Granger + #23 + 2014 first rounder and go from there.
Love and Griffin are 2 of the worst defensive PF's in the league though and thats in large part due to their standing reach and length. Griffin is a lot more athletic than Zeller and that doesn't help him on defense at all. Cody for a number of reasons doesn't project to be a good defender. IMO he's a guy who can score you points and hit that midrange jumper but is going to be a poor defender and average rebounder- which is fine as a third bigman but Im not sold on him as BPA at #8.
If you don't like Love and Griffin, how about Noah. I know you like Noah
Their combine measurements are very comparable. Noah has a 2.5" advantage on wingspan (which does help defensively), but his standing reach 8'10.5" is essentially the same. Height and verticals are essentially the same. Zeller put up more bench presses and tested better agility wise. Overall, I cannot see how these aren't comparable numbers.
I understand the projections, but they are often wrong and I think they could be wrong here. David Lee is another great rebounder and his standing reach was measured at 8'10.5". Both Lee and Noah slowly improved through college. Zeller's rebounding did improve from his freshman year. Is there a reason it can't continue to improve? What is the limiting factor?
His size? I already covered this.
His athleticism? He tested out great at the combine (highest standing vertical in the last decade for a player 6-9 and taller). His agility numbers were great too.
His basketball IQ? His work ethic/motor? I'd put him at or close to the top of this draft class in both these areas.
Maybe his toughness can be questioned, but I think that's about it and imo it's a bit cliche. I'm not even convinced it's true. He has had his struggles, but he definitely doesn't shy away from playing in the paint.