Aldridge wants out?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,819
And1: 38,209
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#81 » by coldfish » Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:47 am

DowJones wrote:The news of LMA wanting out of Portland is good news for Cleveland. Chicago is really not worth a discussion at this point.


Chicago is only worth discussing because LMA brought them up.

The Bulls absolutely do not have the pieces to trump the Cleveland offer that Portland doesn't even want though. Unless LMA develops significant leverage, this is going nowhere.

Won't end well for Portland though. Never does at this point. Portland would be fools to think they are going to get something better than what Cleveland offered. I just wonder if LMA would tell Cleveland to back off.
spaceballer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 2,707
Joined: Mar 05, 2012

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#82 » by spaceballer » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:02 am

I wonder if the Bulls intend to include Thomas Robinson from the Rockets as part of the package for LMA.

According to Stein, they're trying to acquire Robinson but have no intention of keeping him. Maybe he's slated to be part of the package with Deng and whatever else? Thomas Robinson to Portland?

Marc Stein via Twitter wrote:Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine 32s
Follow-up trade rumble: Bulls intend to flip Thomas Robinson in subsequent (or connected) deal if they take him from Rockets for No. 20 pick


So the Rockets would be inadvertently facilitating the LaMarcus Aldridge to Bulls trade as a side effect of the Rocket's pursuit of Dwight Howard and salary shedding.

It'll be funny if the Bulls land Aldridge (who the Rockets also coveted) because of the Rockets helping them with the Thomas Robinson asset. And then the Rockets fail to get Dwight and end up with 20th Pick Eurostash who may or may not ever come over (many Euros don't). Then they'd not only lose out on Dwight, and an asset in T-Rob, and get nothing back if the Euro never comes over, but also have helped the Bulls snatch up the player LMA that they had their eyes set on in the future for the Rockets roster. :lol:
ChiCitySPORTS#1
RealGM
Posts: 20,289
And1: 5,551
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: West Loop

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#83 » by ChiCitySPORTS#1 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:03 am

coldfish wrote:
DowJones wrote:The news of LMA wanting out of Portland is good news for Cleveland. Chicago is really not worth a discussion at this point.


Chicago is only worth discussing because LMA brought them up.

The Bulls absolutely do not have the pieces to trump the Cleveland offer that Portland doesn't even want though. Unless LMA develops significant leverage, this is going nowhere.

Won't end well for Portland though. Never does at this point. Portland would be fools to think they are going to get something better than what Cleveland offered. I just wonder if LMA would tell Cleveland to back off.


Even if LMA doesnt have leverage, who would want to sell the farm for someone who will likely dip out in 2 years? I mean, the Cavs at best case scenario would make the playoffs as an 8th 7th or 6th seed if they paired him with Kyrie. And that's being generous. So winning wont keep him there, and Cleveland isn't much of a destination either.

Maybe I'm wrong but even though he doesn't have the typical "I wont re-sign with 'x' team if you trade me there' ala Melo, but if he makes it clear he wants to play for a particular team, and that team isnt yours...it would have to discourage you a little for trading for him. Look what happened to NO for matching Eric Gordons offer sheet. He doesnt want to play there, and they're probably going to end up trading him and get lesser value.
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,699
And1: 14,074
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#84 » by Effigy » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:04 am

coldfish wrote:
Won't end well for Portland though. Never does at this point. Portland would be fools to think they are going to get something better than what Cleveland offered. I just wonder if LMA would tell Cleveland to back off.


It ended ok for the Lakers when Kobe demanded a trade.... This isn't even a demand. It's anonymous sources.

And why would he tell Cleveland to back off? He's under contract for 2 more years, might as well spend them with another all star in a much easier conference making the playoffs every year.
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,557
And1: 7,560
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#85 » by DowJones » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:08 am

coldfish wrote:
DowJones wrote:The news of LMA wanting out of Portland is good news for Cleveland. Chicago is really not worth a discussion at this point.


Chicago is only worth discussing because LMA brought them up.

The Bulls absolutely do not have the pieces to trump the Cleveland offer that Portland doesn't even want though. Unless LMA develops significant leverage, this is going nowhere.

Won't end well for Portland though. Never does at this point. Portland would be fools to think they are going to get something better than what Cleveland offered. I just wonder if LMA would tell Cleveland to back off.


I don't think it would matter, to be honest. LMA has 2 years left and Cleveland could at least head into the summer of 2014 and pitch a "Big-3" idea to LeBron with Kyrie as your #2 and LMA as your #3 to go with Dion Waiters/Anderson Varejao/Tyler Zeller as secondary pieces.
heh
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 43
Joined: Nov 14, 2012

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#86 » by heh » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:11 am

lma would be such a great fit on the bulls with noah
RaptorNews
RealGM
Posts: 20,828
And1: 23,156
Joined: Jan 27, 2013
   

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#87 » by RaptorNews » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:20 am

richboy wrote:I like Noah but guys like him can be had. They need a player like Aldridge to take the next step. Yeah I'm sure they would love to have Noah and Aldridge together. Should have thought about that when they let Asik go.

Noah is a significantly more impactful player than Aldridge.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,294
And1: 34,140
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#88 » by og15 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:23 am

kodo wrote:
og15 wrote:In terms of playing style and impact, Aldridge and Noah is actually a clone of Hibbert and West except Hibbert is better than Noah as a scorer. Aldridge and West are almost the same player in more than one way.


LMA & West are both scoring PFs but there's some separation between the two, 21 ppg vs 17 ppg.
There's more scoring difference between Wade (21 ppg) and Derozan (18 ppg).

The difference between DeRozan and Wade isn't the PPG averages. If DeRozan did everything else as well as Wade except score less, he's an excellent player. That's an 18/5/5 SG that can handle the ball, is a very excellent off ball defensive player, has a .571 TS% (DeRozan is at .523 TS%). The difference between Wade and DeRozan isn't just PPG average, it's a whole lot of skill set. It's ball handling, passing, help defense, scoring efficiency....

West and Aldridge is a different story, extremely similar skill sets on both ends, each better than the other in one small thing or the other, both excellent shooters, both average to above average defenders, not to mention that West scores 17.1 pts in 33.4 MPG (18.5 pts/36) on the league's slowest paced team, while Aldridge scores 21.1 pts in 37.7 MPG (20.1 pts/36) on an average paced team. The 21 to 17 no longer accurately depicts the actual difference in scoring ability and impact.

Then you compare their scoring efficiency (LMA: .530 TS%, West: .545 TS%). Taking out their less productive years, LMA as a rookie and West's first two seasons, their career pts/36 (LMA: 19.0, West: 18.5). Their last three seasons (including a down year last season for West coming back from his injury):
LMA: 20.4 pts/36, 49.7% FG, .545 TS%, 112 Ortg | West: 18.0 pts/36, 49.9% FG, .546 TS%, 110 Ortg

Then you say "well West was playing off Paul in New Orleans", or wasn't a first option, of course he isn't now and producing similarly, but also, you look at West as a first option the year Paul was injured for a good chunk of the season: 19.0 pts (18.8 per 36), 50.5% FG, .560 TS%, an even the next year when Paul was recovering and West was the first option, and he looks pretty good.

Aldridge is better, but pretty marginally, but he's also 5 years younger, so that's a big deal, but in that front-court comparison, if I can forget Hibbert's awful regular season start and also take into account how many games he misses a year in comparison to Noah, I think my Hibbert over Noah gap from all the factors at the least matches the very tiny Aldridge vs West impact gap, more likely surpasses it because similar impact but more games / greater health ends up becoming more impact.

Now of course, the difference between the two teams is that when healthy, like mentioned, one has Rose and Deng, the other Hill and George, so while George and Deng will give similar impact, and even if you argue George > Deng, which is fine, go ahead, there's a chasm between Rose and Hill.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,200
And1: 8,913
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#89 » by LikeABosh » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:30 am

Portland is rebuilding?
te887848
Starter
Posts: 2,438
And1: 644
Joined: May 15, 2010

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#90 » by te887848 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:47 am

The Bulls would be a great fit if they can just hold off on their cap space when Aldridge hits free agency. Getting a trade done would be tough to do. He would be the missing piece as far as a secondary offensive creator. The Cavs are simply a pipe dream. Portland already doesn't want their #1 overall pick, and they don't have anything else of value to offer in a trade. Not to mention Aldridge would immediately dump them once his contract is up in 2015 anyway.
te887848
Starter
Posts: 2,438
And1: 644
Joined: May 15, 2010

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#91 » by te887848 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:48 am

richboy wrote:I like Noah but guys like him can be had. They need a player like Aldridge to take the next step. Yeah I'm sure they would love to have Noah and Aldridge together. Should have thought about that when they let Asik go.

Yes, and now that they let Asik go, there's nothing they can do about it. Aldridge is a better player than Noah, but swapping the two doesn't make Chicago any better. Their interior D and rebounding are completely shot with such a silly trade.
richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#92 » by richboy » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:09 am

RaptorNews wrote:
richboy wrote:I like Noah but guys like him can be had. They need a player like Aldridge to take the next step. Yeah I'm sure they would love to have Noah and Aldridge together. Should have thought about that when they let Asik go.

Noah is a significantly more impactful player than Aldridge.


If your going to beat Miami the Bulls will need another impact offensive player. A legitimate all-star level second option. If they can get that guy without giving up Noah then go do it. Right now Noah is a extremely good role player. You still need 3 great offensive players besides him to win a title. Until they get those 3 impact offensive players Noah is a luxury that they might not afford. Especially since before losing Asik they played so well without Noah.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden
Downtown
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 578
Joined: Jun 30, 2001

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#93 » by Downtown » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:10 am

coldfish wrote:Chicago is only worth discussing because LMA brought them up.


He did? Don't you mean some unsubstantiated rumour brought it up?
chappadon
Junior
Posts: 387
And1: 87
Joined: Feb 14, 2012

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#94 » by chappadon » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:14 am

Hypothetically, LaMa would be a great fit for the Bulls.
spaceballer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 2,707
Joined: Mar 05, 2012

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#95 » by spaceballer » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:14 am

te887848 wrote:The Bulls would be a great fit if they can just hold off on their cap space when Aldridge hits free agency. Getting a trade done would be tough to do. He would be the missing piece as far as a secondary offensive creator. The Cavs are simply a pipe dream. Portland already doesn't want their #1 overall pick, and they don't have anything else of value to offer in a trade. Not to mention Aldridge would immediately dump them once his contract is up in 2015 anyway.


I highly doubt the Blazers would let a disgruntled Aldridge hit free agency without an attempt to get something back for him. No rush yet, with 2yrs left. But they won't let him hit free agency and leave.
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,699
And1: 14,074
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#96 » by Effigy » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:15 am

chappadon wrote:Hypothetically, LaMa would be a great fit for the Bulls.


Hypothetically Noah would be a great fit in Portland. How about the 10 pick and Wes Mathews for Noah?
BaunceyChillups
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,619
And1: 317
Joined: Jan 30, 2009

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#97 » by BaunceyChillups » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:43 am

Why are Blazers fans so salty about this, their team won 33 games last year and will be treading water for the foreseeable future unless they truly bottom out.
Ice the knees
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 618
Joined: Sep 19, 2012

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#98 » by Ice the knees » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:49 am

Effigy wrote:
chappadon wrote:Hypothetically, LaMa would be a great fit for the Bulls.


Hypothetically Noah would be a great fit in Portland. How about the 10 pick and Wes Mathews for Noah?


The disrespect!
whatchaknow
Analyst
Posts: 3,267
And1: 716
Joined: May 05, 2009

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#99 » by whatchaknow » Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:01 am

BaunceyChillups wrote:Why are Blazers fans so salty about this, their team won 33 games last year and will be treading water for the foreseeable future unless they truly bottom out.


So they should just accept Deng for Aldridge then? hmmmm makes sense why tread water competing for a playoff spot (like they did last year) when you can get nothing of value in return for an all star pf who is a top 20 player in the league and suck? Blazer fans weren't salty at all about the cleveland rumors just some thought they should get more, but when you bring up rumors like Deng for Aldridge what do you expect?? That is seriously an atrocious offer and it doesnt get much better when chicago wont offer up its only real asset portland would have interest in (Noah) or their untouchable role player.
User avatar
orangeparka
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 187
Joined: Apr 23, 2010

Re: Aldridge to Chicago? 

Post#100 » by orangeparka » Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:13 am

LMA's 20/7 on 50% TS on a whopping 41mpg in the playoffs as a first option.

He's definitely an upgrade over Boozer but he won't be that second superstar next to Rose who can compete at a high level in the playoffs.

He's not enough of an upgrade, basically, which is why I can see why they wouldn't be interested in dealing Noah.

But yeah, there's no way POR does a deal around Deng. The CLE deal would be much better for them if trading LMA's the route they wanna go.
Image

Return to The General Board