Image ImageImage Image

WT- Nate unlikely to be back (WAIT! + instagram pic pg 81!)

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

MalcolmXing
Banned User
Posts: 3,779
And1: 503
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
Location: Chicago, Greatest City Ever

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#241 » by MalcolmXing » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:17 am

Ralphb07 wrote:Another thing, I wonder if Rose is pushing for Nate to come back and if that would make the Bulls do it. Reggie's main concern is having someone who can let Rose play off ball some, taking pressure off of him.


Idc wth Reggie wants, the team isn't built for a guy's brother.

I do hope Nate returns cause he'd help Rose but his size is worrisome still.
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#242 » by Ralphb07 » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:23 am

MalcolmXing wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Another thing, I wonder if Rose is pushing for Nate to come back and if that would make the Bulls do it. Reggie's main concern is having someone who can let Rose play off ball some, taking pressure off of him.


Idc wth Reggie wants, the team isn't built for a guy's brother.

I do hope Nate returns cause he'd help Rose but his size is worrisome still.



Rose is 6'4 and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.
red222
RealGM
Posts: 11,513
And1: 2,293
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
       

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#243 » by red222 » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:26 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
MalcolmXing wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Another thing, I wonder if Rose is pushing for Nate to come back and if that would make the Bulls do it. Reggie's main concern is having someone who can let Rose play off ball some, taking pressure off of him.


Idc wth Reggie wants, the team isn't built for a guy's brother.

I do hope Nate returns cause he'd help Rose but his size is worrisome still.



Rose is 6'4
and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.

This is actually true?
User avatar
IWannaGoHIGHER
Veteran
Posts: 2,938
And1: 326
Joined: Jun 07, 2010
Location: McBuckets + Jimmy Buckets = Stacey King Aneurysm
       

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#244 » by IWannaGoHIGHER » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:26 am

Honestly I thought Kirk and Nate played really well towards the end of the season. When they were on the floor together they always seemed to be effective. Kirk would take the harder defensive assignment of the two guards, set up the offense, and let Nate just focus on just doing his thing. I thought they made a great pair. That being said I'd love to see him back. But even if he doesn't I think Teague is going to surprise some people this year (maybe one more year he's still really young).
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#245 » by Ralphb07 » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:29 am

red222 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:
MalcolmXing wrote:
Idc wth Reggie wants, the team isn't built for a guy's brother.

I do hope Nate returns cause he'd help Rose but his size is worrisome still.



Rose is 6'4
and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.

This is actually true?


He was 6'3 when he came in and I thought his boyfriend Bucher said he grew a inch. Even if he is still 6'3, that is still decent and he bulked up.
MalcolmXing
Banned User
Posts: 3,779
And1: 503
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
Location: Chicago, Greatest City Ever

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#246 » by MalcolmXing » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:34 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
MalcolmXing wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Another thing, I wonder if Rose is pushing for Nate to come back and if that would make the Bulls do it. Reggie's main concern is having someone who can let Rose play off ball some, taking pressure off of him.


Idc wth Reggie wants, the team isn't built for a guy's brother.

I do hope Nate returns cause he'd help Rose but his size is worrisome still.



Rose is 6'4 and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.


You're making me grin like an idiot.

That's a great 1-2 punch if Nate can play at the same level..but with Rose on the floor or Kirk handling the ball..can Nate still play like he did? That's the question mark for me.
MalcolmXing
Banned User
Posts: 3,779
And1: 503
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
Location: Chicago, Greatest City Ever

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#247 » by MalcolmXing » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:36 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
red222 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:

Rose is 6'4
and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.

This is actually true?


He was 6'3 when he came in and I thought his boyfriend Bucher said he grew a inch. Even if he is still 6'3, that is still decent and he bulked up.


Didn't Bucher say that with implication that Rose's core is stronger thus he looks a bit taller? I can't actually believe he grew in at his age..
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#248 » by Ralphb07 » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:37 am

MalcolmXing wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:
MalcolmXing wrote:
Idc wth Reggie wants, the team isn't built for a guy's brother.

I do hope Nate returns cause he'd help Rose but his size is worrisome still.



Rose is 6'4 and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.


You're making me grin like an idiot.

That's a great 1-2 punch if Nate can play at the same level..but with Rose on the floor or Kirk handling the ball..can Nate still play like he did? That's the question mark for me.


Derrick and the Bulls want Rose off ball more when he comes back. Also Nate is a deadly 3 point shooter, He shot 40 last year and he takes tough ones. Allow him to spot up, oh my
MalcolmXing
Banned User
Posts: 3,779
And1: 503
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
Location: Chicago, Greatest City Ever

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#249 » by MalcolmXing » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:41 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
MalcolmXing wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:

Rose is 6'4 and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.


You're making me grin like an idiot.

That's a great 1-2 punch if Nate can play at the same level..but with Rose on the floor or Kirk handling the ball..can Nate still play like he did? That's the question mark for me.


Derrick and the Bulls want Rose off ball more when he comes back. Also Nate is a deadly 3 point shooter, He shot 40 last year and he takes tough ones. Allow him to spot up, oh my


Then u ask if Rose can be Rose off the ball? He's no SG.

People want to ignore it but he's a good passer & floor general.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,183
And1: 37,437
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#250 » by fleet » Sun Jun 30, 2013 4:51 am

Never been a fan of midget back courts. And we don't need Nate to play with Rose for Rose to be off the ball. He can play off the ball with Kirk or Teague ar any other PG who plays like a traditional PG. Nate is not a great guy to run the offense. This does not seem like great rationale to resign Nate to me. More solid Rationale for resiging Nate consists of not having somebody to come off the bench who can make shots.
LCMJ
Veteran
Posts: 2,559
And1: 1,225
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#251 » by LCMJ » Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:25 am

MalcolmXing wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:
red222 wrote:This is actually true?


He was 6'3 when he came in and I thought his boyfriend Bucher said he grew a inch. Even if he is still 6'3, that is still decent and he bulked up.


Didn't Bucher say that with implication that Rose's core is stronger thus he looks a bit taller? I can't actually believe he grew in at his age..


*cue the Jerry West pic* and let the debate again.
Derrick Rose & The Chicago Bulls - Fuel to the Fire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U80xGPG7yiw
User avatar
kdapiton
RealGM
Posts: 24,994
And1: 7,459
Joined: Jan 09, 2013
Location: Manetheren
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#252 » by kdapiton » Sun Jun 30, 2013 7:45 am

Why must life be so hard?
we go jim
User avatar
kdapiton
RealGM
Posts: 24,994
And1: 7,459
Joined: Jan 09, 2013
Location: Manetheren
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#253 » by kdapiton » Sun Jun 30, 2013 7:47 am

I LOVE Pasta-Belli. But, I would be willing to let him go if it means more PT for Snell. I honestly would go with that "gamble." Obviously there's a chance that Snell could go Teague on us. But I want to see him just get involve in the rotation early on if it means that he could grow into the good shooter/long defender potential that we see in him.

Given of course that Thibs is willing to play Snell.
we go jim
kuly1990
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 468
Joined: Sep 19, 2010
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#254 » by kuly1990 » Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:37 am

IWannaGoHIGHER wrote:Honestly I thought Kirk and Nate played really well towards the end of the season. When they were on the floor together they always seemed to be effective. Kirk would take the harder defensive assignment of the two guards, set up the offense, and let Nate just focus on just doing his thing. I thought they made a great pair. That being said I'd love to see him back. But even if he doesn't I think Teague is going to surprise some people this year (maybe one more year he's still really young).

they played great together, they are both good three points shooters so they spaced the floor pretty well, i would like that combo as our second unit it could be deadly, if only we drafted Dieng,
bench mob 3.0 Nate Kirk Jimmy/Deng could Taj Dieng could have been amazing defensively like bench mob1.0 with better offense, or little worse defensively but still with better offense, i wonder who would we sign for our backup big!
SpinninHouse
RealGM
Posts: 13,941
And1: 2,725
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#255 » by SpinninHouse » Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:57 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
red222 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:

Rose is 6'4
and bulked up, he should be fine covering some 2's. When Kirk and Robinson play, same goes for Kirk.

You play Miami and have Robinson, Rose, Butler, Deng and Noah close it out, that's pretty damn awesome. Who does LBJ check, Rose or Nate? The other is going to score.

This is actually true?


He was 6'3 when he came in and I thought his boyfriend Bucher said he grew a inch. Even if he is still 6'3, that is still decent and he bulked up.


I heard he's 6'6 now.
FIRE THE JOHN "THE SNAKE" PAXSON, FOR GARMAN, AND FRED HOIBERGER.

#CHICAGOBULLS
User avatar
bigjakesteed
Ballboy
Posts: 34
And1: 30
Joined: Apr 13, 2013
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#256 » by bigjakesteed » Sun Jun 30, 2013 12:17 pm

i dont know how to put a picture on here, but when luol deng invited me out to a game at the united center i got to go up to derrick roses suite and meet him. i have a pic of him and myself and im 6'3. if someone tells me how to post the picture i will put it up. he is definitely taller than me
User avatar
Mr Funk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,287
And1: 5,388
Joined: Jul 18, 2012
Location: Toronto

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#257 » by Mr Funk » Tue Jul 2, 2013 3:14 pm

Marc Berman ‏@NYPost_Berman 4h
#Knicks had conversation with agent about Nate Robinson today but told don't count on a Nate The Gr8t Part II



:pray:
Image
Ctownbulls
RealGM
Posts: 12,883
And1: 3,771
Joined: May 05, 2001

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#258 » by Ctownbulls » Tue Jul 2, 2013 3:19 pm

Chitownbulls wrote:
JackFinn wrote:A Butler-Deng-Boozer-Noah starting lineup, while awesome, puts too much pressure on Derrick to create.


Especially coming off an acl tear...he needs help an a number #2 scorer

You don't win titles with 1 scoring option...plain and simple


Eric Gordon for Deng just makes way too much sense for both teams, especially if the Tyreke signing goes through.
RastaBull
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,955
And1: 2,710
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
         

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#259 » by RastaBull » Tue Jul 2, 2013 3:58 pm

Mr Funk wrote:Marc Berman ‏@NYPost_Berman 4h
#Knicks had conversation with agent about Nate Robinson today but told don't count on a Nate The Gr8t Part II



:pray:


Have the knicks not used there mmle yet? are they connected to any strong rumors of them using it on someone else?

IF nate doesn't get his do and somes with someone for the vet min he should def come back here for 120% of what he made last season
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
User avatar
KissedByaRose1
Rookie
Posts: 1,095
And1: 596
Joined: Feb 22, 2010

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#260 » by KissedByaRose1 » Tue Jul 2, 2013 4:29 pm

Mr Funk wrote:Marc Berman ‏@NYPost_Berman 4h
#Knicks had conversation with agent about Nate Robinson today but told don't count on a Nate The Gr8t Part II



:pray:


Right there with you.
DuckIII wrote: We can't out-Miami, Miami. But based on their roster, we can out-Chicago them.

Return to Chicago Bulls