BowlRips wrote:AggO wrote:KnicksGod wrote:IF there's no 1st in the deal AND if Bargs recovers and can get back to being at least a productive player, getting him without giving up a first is way Way WAY better than getting two very old farts for THREE firsts.
Just saying.
i have no issue taking on bargs
I HAVE A HUGE ISSUE GIVING THEM CAP RELIEF AND PICKS
WE'RE THE ONE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO GET PICKS IN RETURN FOR TAKING ON GARBAGE CONTRACTS
you didnt give up cap relief. if anything you saved 5 mil in 2015
the 2016 pick is the pick as a result of the knicks and nuggets swap.
if the pick was decent and had value itd belong to denver
everyone needs to get their heads out of their asses and see the trade for what it is.
this is where we disagree.
Bargs has 1 big contract that's literally immovable
Camby and Novak are 2 smaller contracts that can be throw ins for any future trades you guys attempt
near term we save you much much more money
































