ImageImageImageImageImage

Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#1 » by moonpie » Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:51 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/mcten/status/351562244481499136[/tweet]
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#2 » by Slava » Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:51 am

Can we get Sessions back?
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#3 » by kblo247 » Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:55 am

I rather Farmar to Sessions. Better athleticism, cheaper cost, and more balls. Sessions was a pussy to be blunt in the playoffs both rounds
Image
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#4 » by dockingsched » Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:57 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Can we get Sessions back?


i wish

anyway with farmar i just don't see a fit. he's not going to want to split minutes with nash and blake, and the lakers need to use the mmle on a different position. jsut don't see the stars aligning for his return.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#5 » by kblo247 » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:00 am

Dantoni is the coach and he has a hard on for the Steves playing together. Farmar based on last year would have a legit shot at beating both out based on talent, athletic ability, and that he's a change of pace from them. Neither of them can get anywhere without a pick, Farmar can at least penetrate and he's not afraid of LA lights
Image
User avatar
crazyeights
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,923
And1: 2,231
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
 

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#6 » by crazyeights » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:03 am

dockingsched wrote:
SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Can we get Sessions back?


i wish

anyway with farmar i just don't see a fit. he's not going to want to split minutes with nash and blake, and the lakers need to use the mmle on a different position. jsut don't see the stars aligning for his return.


Perhaps an indication we're gonna rotate Kobe to the 3/Blake may play some 2?
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#7 » by Slava » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:03 am

I was one of Sessions' biggest critics during that playoff choke fest but you really need to lose a player like that to realize his importance. Even last season, he had like the highest FG conversion % in the paint amongst guards. I'd welcome him with open arms.

Given Charlotte's big man situation, I wouldn't mind dangling Jordan Hill, Meeks and a pick for Sessions.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
LaLa
Banned User
Posts: 4,143
And1: 202
Joined: Mar 09, 2011
Location: ball

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#8 » by LaLa » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:04 am

Are we getting the 2010 bench back together? Bring back LO and Luke too!
User avatar
Ckay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,674
And1: 8,919
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Location: going going, back back, to Cali Cali
 

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#9 » by Ckay » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:10 am

what about Sun Yue? lol
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#10 » by DEEP3CL » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:11 am

I'd Jordan has matured then I'm down. ..if not keep stepping
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
KB24TBOTB
RealGM
Posts: 12,014
And1: 329
Joined: Feb 09, 2011

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#11 » by KB24TBOTB » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:12 am

Im glad that the lakers are at least active :)
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#12 » by Slava » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:14 am

Ckay wrote:what about Sun Yue? lol


The yellow mamba
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#13 » by kblo247 » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:18 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:I was one of Sessions' biggest critics during that playoff choke fest but you really need to lose a player like that to realize his importance. Even last season, he had like the highest FG conversion % in the paint amongst guards. I'd welcome him with open arms.

Given Charlotte's big man situation, I wouldn't mind dangling Jordan Hill, Meeks and a pick for Sessions.

Hill and Meeks okay, but giving up another pick for sessions to be a free agent and leave us again after a season is like a bad remix.
Image
User avatar
Kalidogg24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
 

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#14 » by Kalidogg24 » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:20 am

Jordan Farmar , Game 6 , 2010 NBA Finals one handed tomahawk dunk on KG
REST IN PARADISE GOAT
Image
#TeamFlightBrothers
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#15 » by Kobe System » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:21 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:
Ckay wrote:what about Sun Yue? lol


The yellow mamba


What about --
Image
User avatar
dAdo dA dEvil
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,630
And1: 508
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
 

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#16 » by dAdo dA dEvil » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:34 am

yeah i say let's bring DJ back plus sasha and josh powell ... and maybe adam morrison too ... ^_^
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,252
And1: 9,956
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#17 » by TyCobb » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:39 am

Lets get Chris Mihm to back up Sacre at center.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
NOODLESTYLE
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,827
And1: 828
Joined: Jun 16, 2005

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#18 » by NOODLESTYLE » Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:41 am

Ckay wrote:what about Sun Yue? lol


Adam Morrison and Sasha Vujacic say hello :D

Image
User avatar
TruSkool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,706
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
 

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#19 » by TruSkool » Mon Jul 1, 2013 6:11 am

the only 2 formers we need are trevor ariza and lamar odom. those 2 players will bring the lakers back to their position
what would jack bauer do?
Veteran
Posts: 2,742
And1: 295
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Contact:
 

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest" 

Post#20 » by what would jack bauer do? » Mon Jul 1, 2013 6:24 am

Farmar can actually shoot the 3ball and is a better defender than sessions. I couldn't believe Sessions was a worse defender than Blake when we had him. Sessions just has no explosion laterally and can't fight through screens, it's probably why he'll always be a back up.

My defensive rankings for the recent relevant Lakers pg's:
Fisher > Farmar > Blake > Sessions

Dockingsched I think we can make things line up right. Mitch just needs to do work. Maybe Blake's expiring for Courtney lee. Or Jordan Hill for C. lee and a first round pick. Boston has zero depth up front and Hill is very serviceable.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers