Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, ken6199, Domejandro, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

Was the Harden trade a failure?

Yes
362
86%
No
43
10%
Only if Martin walks without a S & T
16
4%
 
Total votes: 421

RTM
RealGM
Posts: 11,391
And1: 173
Joined: Apr 25, 2005

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#161 » by RTM » Wed Jul 3, 2013 12:33 am

It's a colossal failure.
wadeallday1
Sophomore
Posts: 195
And1: 30
Joined: Jul 02, 2012
Location: Perth, Australia
   

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#162 » by wadeallday1 » Wed Jul 3, 2013 12:37 am

Oh but Sam Presti though!
User avatar
InFlames
RealGM
Posts: 11,089
And1: 3,176
Joined: Mar 16, 2010
Location: Orlando
     

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#163 » by InFlames » Wed Jul 3, 2013 12:40 am

Would OKC be interested in Afflalo?
RaptorNews
RealGM
Posts: 20,828
And1: 23,156
Joined: Jan 27, 2013
   

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#164 » by RaptorNews » Wed Jul 3, 2013 12:46 am

They literally could have traded Perkins and Harden for Amir Johnson and done about 2-3x better than they did with the Houston deal

Baffling trade at the time, and even more baffling now. Unless Presti can only get his dick up by being in the draft lottery it made (and continues to make) no sense.

You trade the future #1 SG, keep Perkins, and do not receive any high calibre big men in return. Amazing.
User avatar
Flash4thewin
RealGM
Posts: 13,373
And1: 9,646
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#165 » by Flash4thewin » Wed Jul 3, 2013 12:51 am

nyc6 wrote:
DivineFury wrote:
Troubadour wrote:
They were selling out every game. It's better to make a run for a championship than to break up a team prematurely.


If you don't understand how a small market team can't afford to pay million's in penalties than I can't help you. And every year it would get worse basically.


Discussions of whether or not OKC should have traded harden is a waste of time. It's sad that 80%+ posters are talking about. OKc is a small market team and had to trade harden as they can't afford him. I'm sick of these boards theories that some players should never be traded like Jrue holiday

The discussion should be about why did presti wait until last minute and make such a careless off-market deal with his back against the wall leading to extremely poor return at the time of the trade (who cares how lamb and Adams turn out. All we know is he got 2 #12 picks).

Haven't found any excuses yet for Presti

Harden should have been shopped for 1.5-2 years not last minute


You are fundamentally ignoring that OKC picked Ibaka over Harden. Harden is now considering a top 15 player (some have him in the top 10). Would any team trade a Harden for an Ibaka ?
User avatar
JoseRizal
General Manager
Posts: 7,968
And1: 2,268
Joined: Oct 21, 2010
 

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#166 » by JoseRizal » Wed Jul 3, 2013 1:12 am

You just got one more vote for yes...
asindc
Pro Prospect
Posts: 865
And1: 152
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: In front of the computer.

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#167 » by asindc » Wed Jul 3, 2013 1:15 am

It was safe to call it a failure then.
Though Dr. J, Darnell Hillman, and Artis Gilmore's fros got most of the attention, George C. Trapp's fro should be noted for its bouncy qualities.
User avatar
heatwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 18,780
And1: 13,823
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
     

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#168 » by heatwillbeback » Wed Jul 3, 2013 1:17 am

at some point you need to stop building and go all in on what you have.

You had three stars. You had role players. All you needed was to keep surrounding them with vets (not Derek Fisher).

Look, I get it. Jeremy Lamb and Perry Jones are talented. However, that talent doesnt mean all that much to a contending team. Turn it into something that could win now. Thats the key, and its something that OKC doesnt seem to be very good at. They are past the stage of collecting assets, and need to go all in on what they have. You cant always be building.
Image
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,668
And1: 11,834
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#169 » by LightTheBeam » Wed Jul 3, 2013 1:23 am

Tumakapac713 wrote:
noobcake wrote:
Tumakapac713 wrote:
I personally have him at #9 or #10 (I flip-flop on Dwight all the time due to injuries, attitude, etc.) but most people refer to him as a top 15 player so I just went with that.


Name 8 players better than Harden


LeBron, Durant, Paul, Melo, Kobe, Westbrook, Duncan, Parker, and easily Dwight when he gets his act together.


You are reaching extremely hard on a lot of these players. I would hands down rather have Harden over Melo, Kobe and as much as I love Duncan him as well.

Tier 1 - Lebron
Tier 2 -Durant
Tier 3 - Paul, Westbrook, Harden, Parker, Dwight(when healthy, motivated, and not acting like a clown... so never) and maybe, maybe, Paul George. We will see how Rose comes back from this injury.

To hands down put these tier 3 players ahead of him is crazy. You can't tell me switching out Harden for any ONE player not named Lebron or Durant would make the Rockets better. As far as overall value I think Harden is 3rd really. Crazy to think last year was the 1st season he has had the chance to do his thing, can't imagine this guys ceiling.

OKC's front office really screwed up a good thing, they have proven to be amazing at drafting and absolutely horrible at trading. Kd has no real reason to stay, that team is not contending anytime soon unless Lamb becomes Harden 2.0
nyc6
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,332
And1: 83
Joined: Jun 29, 2010

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#170 » by nyc6 » Wed Jul 3, 2013 1:37 am

Flash4thewin wrote:
nyc6 wrote:
DivineFury wrote:
If you don't understand how a small market team can't afford to pay million's in penalties than I can't help you. And every year it would get worse basically.


Discussions of whether or not OKC should have traded harden is a waste of time. It's sad that 80%+ posters are talking about. OKc is a small market team and had to trade harden as they can't afford him. I'm sick of these boards theories that some players should never be traded like Jrue holiday

The discussion should be about why did presti wait until last minute and make such a careless off-market deal with his back against the wall leading to extremely poor return at the time of the trade (who cares how lamb and Adams turn out. All we know is he got 2 #12 picks).

Haven't found any excuses yet for Presti

Harden should have been shopped for 1.5-2 years not last minute


You are fundamentally ignoring that OKC picked Ibaka over Harden. Harden is now considering a top 15 player (some have him in the top 10). Would any team trade a Harden for an Ibaka ?


Like I indirectly indicated I agree with this already but lets cut Presti some slack here and give him a pass on this aspect. I would have kept harden as well as Sg is scarce and stars are irreplaceable, etc. But he is far from untrade-able just like Stephen curry and kyrie Irving (lebron and KD are Only utrade-able players). So trading harden is not outrageous by any means.

The bigger issue is how he handled the trade. Just pure careless and lazy last minute trade
(6/29/2010)
RealGM.com where all players and coaches are scrubs except lebron and pop

(6/29/2013)
Pop and Lebron are officially scrubs due to questionable rotations and passive play in crunch time
noobcake
Banned User
Posts: 2,571
And1: 442
Joined: May 18, 2009

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#171 » by noobcake » Wed Jul 3, 2013 1:38 am

SacGreene916 wrote:
Tumakapac713 wrote:
noobcake wrote:
Name 8 players better than Harden


LeBron, Durant, Paul, Melo, Kobe, Westbrook, Duncan, Parker, and easily Dwight when he gets his act together.


You are reaching extremely hard on a lot of these players. I would hands down rather have Harden over Melo, Kobe and as much as I love Duncan him as well.

Tier 1 - Lebron
Tier 2 -Durant
Tier 3 - Paul, Westbrook, Harden, Parker, Dwight(when healthy, motivated, and not acting like a clown... so never) and maybe, maybe, Paul George. We will see how Rose comes back from this injury.

To hands down put these tier 3 players ahead of him is crazy. You can't tell me switching out Harden for any ONE player not named Lebron or Durant would make the Rockets better. As far as overall value I think Harden is 3rd really. Crazy to think last year was the 1st season he has had the chance to do his thing, can't imagine this guys ceiling.

OKC's front office really screwed up a good thing, they have proven to be amazing at drafting and absolutely horrible at trading. Kd has no real reason to stay, that team is not contending anytime soon unless Lamb becomes Harden 2.0


This

Harden is 6-7th best player, probably 4th in value. I disagree in the sense that Irving has the 3rd most value.

He is 23 year old, built like an ox, has no history of serious injuries, and just put up 26/5/6 on 60% TS.
ReturnofMVP3
RealGM
Posts: 14,851
And1: 11,618
Joined: Dec 14, 2011
       

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#172 » by ReturnofMVP3 » Wed Jul 3, 2013 1:40 am

Unless Lamb or Perry Jones turn out to be alstars who didn't get minutes and/or this guy they drafted is a bust then yes it was a total failure. I'll keep my opinion partial right now but I wouldn't hold my breath either.
JASON TATUM IS BETTER THAN HIS HERO KOBE BRYANT
Tumakapac713
Senior
Posts: 672
And1: 325
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#173 » by Tumakapac713 » Wed Jul 3, 2013 2:02 am

SacGreene916 wrote:
Tumakapac713 wrote:
noobcake wrote:
Name 8 players better than Harden


LeBron, Durant, Paul, Melo, Kobe, Westbrook, Duncan, Parker, and easily Dwight when he gets his act together.


You are reaching extremely hard on a lot of these players. I would hands down rather have Harden over Melo, Kobe and as much as I love Duncan him as well.

Tier 1 - Lebron
Tier 2 -Durant
Tier 3 - Paul, Westbrook, Harden, Parker, Dwight(when healthy, motivated, and not acting like a clown... so never) and maybe, maybe, Paul George. We will see how Rose comes back from this injury.

To hands down put these tier 3 players ahead of him is crazy. You can't tell me switching out Harden for any ONE player not named Lebron or Durant would make the Rockets better.


I can easily use the counterargument that if you switch Harden with Parker or Duncan, they wouldn't have made the finals. And i definitely wouldn't rather have Harden "hands down" over Melo or Kobe. Is there an argument? Sure. But it's close. Paul George is close as well and I think it goes without saying that a healthy Derrick Rose is also better than Harden. I have no problem with saying Harden is the 9th or 10th best player in the league right now. Considering he's only been the man for one season, it's pretty impressive.
"Own team own League! To For Self!!!"
OldeBoy
Senior
Posts: 509
And1: 240
Joined: May 13, 2005

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#174 » by OldeBoy » Wed Jul 3, 2013 2:09 am

SacGreene916 wrote:
Tumakapac713 wrote:
noobcake wrote:
Name 8 players better than Harden


LeBron, Durant, Paul, Melo, Kobe, Westbrook, Duncan, Parker, and easily Dwight when he gets his act together.


You are reaching extremely hard on a lot of these players. I would hands down rather have Harden over Melo, Kobe and as much as I love Duncan him as well.

Tier 1 - Lebron
Tier 2 -Durant
Tier 3 - Paul, Westbrook, Harden, Parker, Dwight(when healthy, motivated, and not acting like a clown... so never) and maybe, maybe, Paul George. We will see how Rose comes back from this injury.

To hands down put these tier 3 players ahead of him is crazy. You can't tell me switching out Harden for any ONE player not named Lebron or Durant would make the Rockets better. As far as overall value I think Harden is 3rd really. Crazy to think last year was the 1st season he has had the chance to do his thing, can't imagine this guys ceiling.

OKC's front office really screwed up a good thing, they have proven to be amazing at drafting and absolutely horrible at trading. Kd has no real reason to stay, that team is not contending anytime soon unless Lamb becomes Harden 2.0


Not contending anytime soon? Did they contend this year when they won 60 games and had the #1 seed? They have 2 top 7 players who havent even reached their prime yet. Do teams need 3 allstars to contend nowadays?
User avatar
theokie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,032
And1: 617
Joined: Dec 22, 2008

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#175 » by theokie » Wed Jul 3, 2013 2:41 am

Its an absolute failure, but not because of the trade, because the owners weren't willing to pony up.

Martin leaving now though has nothing to do with it. Its been reported for 9 months now that he was just a 1 year stop gap, and that he would walk away in free agency. Don't get why everyones acting so surprised.


I don't get why people are already giving up on Lamb just because he didnt get minutes. Reggie Jackson was wearing a suit last postseason, and this postseason he was our second best player at times. OKC is good at drafting and developing players.



If OKC could improve their team after losing Harden, i see no reason why they can't improve their team again after losing Martin.
spearsy23 wrote: Kevin Durant could save a dozen orphans from a fire and realgm would point out that Lebron would have just put the fire out.
Chalky White
Banned User
Posts: 862
And1: 154
Joined: Jan 01, 2013

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#176 » by Chalky White » Wed Jul 3, 2013 2:53 am

theokie wrote:Its an absolute failure, but not because of the trade, because the owners weren't willing to pony up.

Martin leaving now though has nothing to do with it. Its been reported for 9 months now that he was just a 1 year stop gap, and that he would walk away in free agency. Don't get why everyones acting so surprised.


I don't get why people are already giving up on Lamb just because he didnt get minutes. Reggie Jackson was wearing a suit last postseason, and this postseason he was our second best player at times. OKC is good at drafting and developing players.


No, the trade was terrible.
User avatar
theokie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,032
And1: 617
Joined: Dec 22, 2008

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#177 » by theokie » Wed Jul 3, 2013 2:55 am

Chalky White wrote:
theokie wrote:Its an absolute failure, but not because of the trade, because the owners weren't willing to pony up.

Martin leaving now though has nothing to do with it. Its been reported for 9 months now that he was just a 1 year stop gap, and that he would walk away in free agency. Don't get why everyones acting so surprised.


I don't get why people are already giving up on Lamb just because he didnt get minutes. Reggie Jackson was wearing a suit last postseason, and this postseason he was our second best player at times. OKC is good at drafting and developing players.


No, the trade was terrible.


So OKC would have been better off letting him go away for nothing? Ya that makes sense.

Its all on the owners for not wanting to give him the max. He was going to a new team regardless because of that.
spearsy23 wrote: Kevin Durant could save a dozen orphans from a fire and realgm would point out that Lebron would have just put the fire out.
User avatar
heatwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 18,780
And1: 13,823
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
     

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#178 » by heatwillbeback » Wed Jul 3, 2013 2:55 am

theokie wrote:Its an absolute failure, but not because of the trade, because the owners weren't willing to pony up.

Martin leaving now though has nothing to do with it. Its been reported for 9 months now that he was just a 1 year stop gap, and that he would walk away in free agency. Don't get why everyones acting so surprised.


I don't get why people are already giving up on Lamb just because he didnt get minutes. Reggie Jackson was wearing a suit last postseason, and this postseason he was our second best player at times. OKC is good at drafting and developing players.



If OKC could improve their team after losing Harden, i see no reason why they can't improve their team again after losing Martin.


Its not the time to give up established talent in order to develop players- that what rebuilding teams do.
Image
User avatar
theokie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,032
And1: 617
Joined: Dec 22, 2008

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#179 » by theokie » Wed Jul 3, 2013 2:59 am

heatwillbeback wrote:
theokie wrote:Its an absolute failure, but not because of the trade, because the owners weren't willing to pony up.

Martin leaving now though has nothing to do with it. Its been reported for 9 months now that he was just a 1 year stop gap, and that he would walk away in free agency. Don't get why everyones acting so surprised.


I don't get why people are already giving up on Lamb just because he didnt get minutes. Reggie Jackson was wearing a suit last postseason, and this postseason he was our second best player at times. OKC is good at drafting and developing players.



If OKC could improve their team after losing Harden, i see no reason why they can't improve their team again after losing Martin.


Its not the time to give up established talent in order to develop players- that what rebuilding teams do.


Thanks for clearing that up :roll:

We shouldn't have traded Harden, we should've paid him. I already know that and I've repeatedly said that.

Martin knew, OKC fans knew, and OKC management knew for monhts that Martin was leaving this summer, i don't get why NOW the trade was a failure. It was a failure in November. Paying Martin 30 million wouldnt redeem anything.
spearsy23 wrote: Kevin Durant could save a dozen orphans from a fire and realgm would point out that Lebron would have just put the fire out.
Chalky White
Banned User
Posts: 862
And1: 154
Joined: Jan 01, 2013

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now? 

Post#180 » by Chalky White » Wed Jul 3, 2013 3:05 am

theokie wrote:
Chalky White wrote:
theokie wrote:Its an absolute failure, but not because of the trade, because the owners weren't willing to pony up.

Martin leaving now though has nothing to do with it. Its been reported for 9 months now that he was just a 1 year stop gap, and that he would walk away in free agency. Don't get why everyones acting so surprised.


I don't get why people are already giving up on Lamb just because he didnt get minutes. Reggie Jackson was wearing a suit last postseason, and this postseason he was our second best player at times. OKC is good at drafting and developing players.


No, the trade was terrible.


So OKC would have been better off letting him go away for nothing? Ya that makes sense.

Its all on the owners for not wanting to give him the max. He was going to a new team regardless because of that.


He was a restricted free agent, he wouldn't have walked for nothing. Waiting would have netted a much better package than Jeremy Lamb and Steve Adams.


Sam Presti made a poor move, and compounded that be extending one of the worst coaches in the league. He's an overrated GM.

Return to The General Board