jdm3 wrote:MasterIchiro wrote:I think we need to define treadmill.
A team with Kemba, MKG, Zeller and Biz is very young and can improve significantly. We've already seen Kemba do that.
The 8th seed in the playoffs doesn't make us a treadmill team, it makes us a new playoff team with lots of youth plus a pick from DET and POR to add to the rebuild.
The team has not reached its potential. To call them a treadmill team translates to you basically thinking none of these young players has the capacity to improve at all.
Biz will not improve at the rate he should with a ball hog black hole playing ahead of him. Zeller will be stunted as well due to lack of touches and you could say the same for MKG. We would have been better giving the time Jefferson is going to get to Biz and McRoberts and then giving his touches to Zeller, who has to learn a new position on offense and defense, and MKG who needs reps as a scorer to get better. There is no substitute of game minutes and we are going to give them to a 28 year old black hole.
My defenition of treadmill is a team that is not doing what it needs to get better either as a team or building a team. When you hold back your youth but don't improve the rest of the team enough to be good, you are on the treadmill. This team likely peaks at 7th seed and barely misses other years. In other words wont get better through the draft and won't improve enough on the court either.
OK so you admit that these are talented young players so what makes us a treadmill team in your eyes is reduced development time? Teams can't be both competitive while rebuilding at the same time?
I always thought the amount of playing time a player receives doesn't necessarily equate to linear development. In some situations, assimilation of a player is more effective as a gradual process where younger players share time with veterans whose strengths serve as a model for them. Sometimes, too much time, too soon, can expose a young players flaws, shake his confidence and force him to do things he's not ready to do. So sometimes too much playing time can become counterproductive and hinder development. I think maybe you feel increased minutes equate to increased production. They're correlated but time does not always maximize production. Sometimes it exaggerates inefficiencies. Did Byron Mullens develop with more playing time? Nope. He became a nightmare and he's out of a job now. So much for increased playing time to young players who haven't learned enough to know what to do with it.
Bottom line is, some young players handle globs of playing time heaped upon them and grow and develop. Others must be placed in situations where they may achieve success in order to fully realize their potential - and that's not every situation, every time, with unlimited minutes.
It has been written...