spaceman_E wrote:tontoz wrote:
None of the actual players you listed have led their teams anywhere.
'
Still waiting on these "high upside" picks you are talking about that lead their teams to titlecontention 9 times out of 10. Looks to me like you are talking about guys who were the best players when they were drafted. the only title contender the Cavs had is with Lebron who was the undisputed best player in his draft.
The best player at the draft is generally the best player in 10 years, assuming there isn't a big age difference. forgoing the best player in favor of the "upside" pick is where GMs screw up so often.
Go back and read again, he mentioned Kobe and Garnett. An easier way to think about it might be Okafor vs D Howard. Or Steph Curry vs Miller/Foye.
Although I disagree with you Consig on the Pistons. Rip was the only "safe" choice from that squad when originally drafted and even his acquisition to Detroit was a bit of a gamble in giving up Stackhouse. Ok, Prince was safe too I guess but he was late-1st.
Kobe and Garnett are bad examples. High school players were rarely drafted back then. They were probably already better players than everyone drafted after them and most drafted in front of them. Kobe was drafted at 13 lol. Boston didn't draft Garnett, they signed him as a free agent.
Plus like i said you have to take into account age. That is why i wasn't as high on Dipo as many here since he had a breakout in his junior year. Back when Kobe/Garnett came out players stayed in college much longer.
And for the record i was open to drafting Bennett even though Porter was my first choice. Bennett already has well developed shooting/ball handling skills. His issues have less to do with skill development and more to do with length and defensive effort.