Image ImageImage Image

WT- Nate unlikely to be back (WAIT! + instagram pic pg 81!)

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

User avatar
KissedByaRose1
Rookie
Posts: 1,095
And1: 596
Joined: Feb 22, 2010

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#961 » by KissedByaRose1 » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:01 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
‏@JaredZwerling

Source: Toney Douglas has accepted an offer from the Golden State Warriors.
Details


Another suitor out of the mix. Golden State is who I feared most.


Helllll yes.

Come back home Nate. Give Rose the best offensive player he's had since Thibs got here.
DuckIII wrote: We can't out-Miami, Miami. But based on their roster, we can out-Chicago them.
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,806
And1: 2,941
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#962 » by Ben » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:09 pm

I still want to read that Utah will go with JLIII ...
User avatar
caribbean_cool
Ballboy
Posts: 49
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 07, 2013

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#963 » by caribbean_cool » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:12 pm

Toney Douglas going to Golden State so scratch them from the list.
User avatar
caribbean_cool
Ballboy
Posts: 49
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 07, 2013

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#964 » by caribbean_cool » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:15 pm

Oops, sorry, already reported, but still. I think the only competition for the Bulls to get Nate are the Lakers, since they are the only good team that have some money, but I haven't read anything about them going after Nate.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,442
And1: 30,512
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#965 » by HomoSapien » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:17 pm

Anyone tracking what teams still have more money to offer than us?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,140
And1: 4,693
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#966 » by Jvaughn » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:17 pm

Ben wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
‏@JaredZwerling

Source: Toney Douglas has accepted an offer from the Golden State Warriors.
Details


Another suitor out of the mix. Golden State is who I feared most.


Is that for the minimum? B/c they already used their MMLE on Speights...


It better be. Douglas is barely worth the minimum.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
Good Hope
Junior
Posts: 291
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 15, 2008

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#967 » by Good Hope » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:19 pm

dice wrote:
KissedByaRose1 wrote:
Gar Paxdorf wrote:If we I only offer nate the bare minimum and won't offer the 20% raise, that will be disgraceful IMO.


Completely agree.

i think we have already offered the 20% raise. no reason not to. it's peanuts


Well, it's however many peanuts, DOUBLED!
"Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see."

Hebrews 11:1

There are better things to hope for than the Bulls, but it is fun to try!
User avatar
pylb
General Manager
Posts: 8,190
And1: 3,695
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
Location: Paris
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#968 » by pylb » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:22 pm

caribbean_cool wrote:Oops, sorry, already reported, but still. I think the only competition for the Bulls to get Nate are the Lakers, since they are the only good team that have some money, but I haven't read anything about them going after Nate.

Do they actually have any money ? I thought they were still over the cap even after the MWP amnesty.
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,184
And1: 7,859
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#969 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:25 pm

Ben wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
‏@JaredZwerling

Source: Toney Douglas has accepted an offer from the Golden State Warriors.
Details


Another suitor out of the mix. Golden State is who I feared most.


Is that for the minimum? B/c they already used their MMLE on Speights...


Not sure. I just checked with a Warrior blogger friend of mine. He said Golden State may still have the full MLE and/or bi-annual exceptions to use, depending on the yet-to-be-determined terms of the Iggy S&T. He's pretty sure Douglas is a vet min signing, though.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,806
And1: 2,941
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#970 » by Ben » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:33 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
Ben wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
Another suitor out of the mix. Golden State is who I feared most.


Is that for the minimum? B/c they already used their MMLE on Speights...


Not sure. I just checked with a Warrior blogger friend of mine. He said Golden State may still have the full MLE and/or bi-annual exceptions to use, depending on the yet-to-be-determined terms of the Iggy S&T. He's pretty sure Douglas is a vet min signing, though.


Hmm. I thought that GSW would just get trade exceptions for the Iggy S&T, not preserve MLE and other exceptions. But I don't know very much.

EDIT: here's some info from the GSW board:
turk3d wrote:I think we may have a coupple of TPEs (Rush 3.2M and Jack's 6.1) in addition to being able to use the MLE if we wanted, Who would you like us to bring in for that job?


And that's from this morning. So it looks as if they could offer Nate much more than we could, if they so chose. Wonder whether they're going to stand pat with Douglas?
BahamaBull
General Manager
Posts: 8,302
And1: 2,150
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Bahamas
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#971 » by BahamaBull » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:36 pm

Nate makes too much sense...

- reliable 3 point shooter
- shot creator
- instant offense from the bench
- Great teammate and locker room influence
- loves playing for the Bulls
- Fans love him

Too bad his D sucks but for that price...We must be really dumb to not bring him back...
#242
RastaBull
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,952
And1: 2,709
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
         

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#972 » by RastaBull » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:42 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
‏@JaredZwerling

Source: Toney Douglas has accepted an offer from the Golden State Warriors.
Details


Another suitor out of the mix. Golden State is who I feared most.


Who are the other viable suitors left?

Really not sure any legit contenders out there are looking for what he offers (or have cap space/exceptions left).

One team I'm worried about would be the Jazz. They need some veterans and have 20 mil they HAVE to spend (team salary minimum is around 49 mil and they only have 28 mil right now). They could easily offer 2-3 million for Nate to back up Burke.

Philly maybe? Again, they have the cap space to give him at least 2-3 million...Carter-Williams could use a veteran back-up.

Toronto still has a MMLE right? Not sure a team with high salary and not ready to compete for the playoffs would spend that on Nate though.

Dallas? They need something exciting...they need something off the bench even with the Calderon signing. Have the cap space for 2-3 million, but can't imagine them doing anything more than a year (waiting for FA again in 2014).

Would Orlando use some of their MLE on him? Again, already a high salary with not much too compete for (they picked up E'Twaun again anyways on the cheap).

I think teams I'm gonna be watching out for are Philly and Utah. Both probably are seeking to be high lotto teams, but both need to spend to get to the minimum team salary. Nate will bring excitement to hold some fans in the stands, but won't make so much of an impact to lift them high from the bottom of the league. Both have very little money invested in PG (rookies) so they may be willing to even grant Nate a multi-year deal at 2-3 mil (it would allow them to assess other needs in the draft and with cap space they'll have in 2014).
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,184
And1: 7,859
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#973 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:44 pm

Ben wrote:And that's from this morning. So it looks as if they could offer Nate much more than we could, if they so chose. Wonder whether they're going to stand pat with Douglas?


I'm guessing they will. The early buzz is that Iggy will play some backup point guard minutes. And they still need more depth in the frontcourt. Could be wrong, though.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
RastaBull
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,952
And1: 2,709
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
         

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#974 » by RastaBull » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:46 pm

pylb wrote:
caribbean_cool wrote:Oops, sorry, already reported, but still. I think the only competition for the Bulls to get Nate are the Lakers, since they are the only good team that have some money, but I haven't read anything about them going after Nate.

Do they actually have any money ? I thought they were still over the cap even after the MWP amnesty.


THey'd have the MMLE right? But I can't imagine them giving Nate a multi-year deal (they're looking at all that cap space in 2014)...PLUS, they have Black and Nash this year so I don't think PG is what they'll use the MMLE on.
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
User avatar
Tenchi Ryu
RealGM
Posts: 17,372
And1: 6,426
Joined: Aug 04, 2012
Location: South Side Wild 100's
     

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#975 » by Tenchi Ryu » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:51 pm

dingdeng wrote:
Too bad his D sucks but for that price...We must be really dumb to not bring him back...

It's official that we do want him back. Now its just a matter of Nate taking what we offered. So the ball is in his court
[x] Fire Thibs
[x] Fire Kirk
[x] Fire Noah
[x] Fire GarPax
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,184
And1: 7,859
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#976 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:59 pm

RastaBull wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
‏@JaredZwerling

Source: Toney Douglas has accepted an offer from the Golden State Warriors.
Details


Another suitor out of the mix. Golden State is who I feared most.


Who are the other viable suitors left?

Really not sure any legit contenders out there are looking for what he offers (or have cap space/exceptions left).

One team I'm worried about would be the Jazz. They need some veterans and have 20 mil they HAVE to spend (team salary minimum is around 49 mil and they only have 28 mil right now). They could easily offer 2-3 million for Nate to back up Burke.

Philly maybe? Again, they have the cap space to give him at least 2-3 million...Carter-Williams could use a veteran back-up.

Toronto still has a MMLE right? Not sure a team with high salary and not ready to compete for the playoffs would spend that on Nate though.

Dallas? They need something exciting...they need something off the bench even with the Calderon signing. Have the cap space for 2-3 million, but can't imagine them doing anything more than a year (waiting for FA again in 2014).

Would Orlando use some of their MLE on him? Again, already a high salary with not much too compete for (they picked up E'Twaun again anyways on the cheap).

I think teams I'm gonna be watching out for are Philly and Utah. Both probably are seeking to be high lotto teams, but both need to spend to get to the minimum team salary. Nate will bring excitement to hold some fans in the stands, but won't make so much of an impact to lift them high from the bottom of the league. Both have very little money invested in PG (rookies) so they may be willing to even grant Nate a multi-year deal at 2-3 mil (it would allow them to assess other needs in the draft and with cap space they'll have in 2014).



Good list. The teams that scare me most of the ones you mentioned are Toronto (if they do indeed have their MMLE) and Utah.

Dallas already gave Devon Harris $9 mil/3 years, so I don't think they'd offer Nate more than the minimum if anything at all.

And I don't know why rebuilding teams like Philly or Orlando would offer Nate a multi-year contract. Especially ORL, who already has Jameer and plans on giving Oladipo a lot of minutes at the point.

Toronto is genuinely interested in making the playoffs, and Utah could use a competent PG as an insurance policy for Burke.

All that said, I just know some team is going to come out of nowhere and crush our dreams. Nate isn't a minimum guy. It just takes on GM to see that.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
BahamaBull
General Manager
Posts: 8,302
And1: 2,150
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Bahamas
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#977 » by BahamaBull » Tue Jul 9, 2013 6:59 pm

Tenchi Ryu wrote:
dingdeng wrote:
Too bad his D sucks but for that price...We must be really dumb to not bring him back...

It's official that we do want him back. Now its just a matter of Nate taking what we offered. So the ball is in his court


You mean official by Alex Kennedy?
#242
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,658
And1: 10,106
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#978 » by League Circles » Tue Jul 9, 2013 7:07 pm

keeping nate and adding a good big like brand or whoever might make this the best Bulls team of all time IMO.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,140
And1: 4,693
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#979 » by Jvaughn » Tue Jul 9, 2013 7:14 pm

Ben wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
Ben wrote:
Is that for the minimum? B/c they already used their MMLE on Speights...


Not sure. I just checked with a Warrior blogger friend of mine. He said Golden State may still have the full MLE and/or bi-annual exceptions to use, depending on the yet-to-be-determined terms of the Iggy S&T. He's pretty sure Douglas is a vet min signing, though.


Hmm. I thought that GSW would just get trade exceptions for the Iggy S&T, not preserve MLE and other exceptions. But I don't know very much.

EDIT: here's some info from the GSW board:
turk3d wrote:I think we may have a coupple of TPEs (Rush 3.2M and Jack's 6.1) in addition to being able to use the MLE if we wanted, Who would you like us to bring in for that job?


And that's from this morning. So it looks as if they could offer Nate much more than we could, if they so chose. Wonder whether they're going to stand pat with Douglas?


Well the MLE is the most likely target if they want Nate, since we'd have to agree on a S&T if they wanted to use their TPE, and Nate would still be restricted to the vet min + 20% scale if that was the case.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
BahamaBull
General Manager
Posts: 8,302
And1: 2,150
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Bahamas
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#980 » by BahamaBull » Tue Jul 9, 2013 7:14 pm

Gar Paxdorf wrote:keeping nate and adding a good big like brand or whoever might make this the best Bulls team of all time IMO.


:confused:
#242

Return to Chicago Bulls