Stein Reporting that ATL/MIL discussing Teague/Jennings

[dms269]

He has had 1 season where he shot better than .400 from the floor. Compared to Teague who had 1 season where he shot worse and in both of his starting seasons, Teague shot better than .450%.

Exactly. I'm not interested in Jennings or Bynum or Ellis. It's not good to make a move just to be making moves. Wait for the right players and then take the opprotunity to go after them. Don't just acquire a bunch of medicore assests.

I disagree about Monta and Bynum though. I do like Monta, especially if he can return to his GSW days. 20 ppg on good percentages, sign me up.

I think Bynum is worth the risk. When he is on he is a top 5 center. He is a gamble but signing him and having him play well would mean an insane big rotation.

[Rod700]

^ I feel like I'm taking us in the direction that D21's thread is already going in. It's about cap room and future signings. I will try to post something there this afternoon on my philosphy of how a team should be built.

[jtrinaldi]

Bucks offersheet for Teague is coming today

[niffoc4]

Bucks offersheet for Teague is coming today

Huh, I wonder how much it's for. If it's reasonable, I could see the Hawks matching. Then, if Jeff's really not a fit with the new Hawks and/or Schroeder looks ready, he could be a good trade asset.

[JoshB914]

This thread is hilarious on the Sanders/Horford topic. Both sides acting like there is a clear answer when there isn't. Homerism/personal bias getting in the way of anyone making a legit argument. Let's wait to see what type of player Sanders grows into before we all act so sure of ourselves. We know what Al is, we don't yet know what LS will become.

[BuckFan25226]

This thread is hilarious on the Sanders/Horford topic. Both sides acting like there is a clear answer when there isn't. Homerism/personal bias getting in the way of anyone making a legit argument. Let's wait to see what type of player Sanders grows into before we all act so sure of ourselves. We know what Al is, we don't yet know what LS will become.

I completely agree. Horford would be the best player we have had probably since Ray Allen/Dog/Cassell.

With that being said, it would be tough for me to give up on Sanders. For the player and defensive juggernaut Sanders has become, we have him for 2 more years at an unbelievable bargain. Now if there would be any way to grab Horford for anything else, I'm all ears. I think a Horford/Sanders frontcourt would be scary.

And I'm guessing a Henson/1st rd pick offer wouldn't suffice??

[Jamaaliver]

fine, if your so confident, go to the Bucks board and propose the trade.

Horford also missed the all star game last year, which does sit well with Bucks fans. so at this point, both Sanders and Horford are good post players are didn't make the all star team, except that Sanders is younger and cheaper.

It's hard to discuss, intelligently, a matter with someone whose arguments are beaten down, only to see him say, "Oh yeah? Well what about this next argument?" Could you try to defend your own points, rather than just moving on to new ones?

You said that Horford and Sanders are 4 years apart. In truth, they are 2 years and 4 months apart.
You said that Horford has "already hit his peak." uga_dawgs24 pointed out that Horford has improved each year of his career - clear proof that he has not reached his peak.
You said that Horford has only 3 good years left - years where he will be "relevant," yet fail to note that that means that Sanders has only 5 more years, so he won't be "relevant" for that time, either.

When shown you were wrong, all you could do is challenge us to come to the Bucks' board. You didn't defend your ideas; you didn't say, "My bad;" you didn't even say ouch. You pretended your defeat never happened. Why should we care to debate a poster who cannot defend his posts? If you don't believe in your arguments, why should we bother?

no, no matter how you spin it, Horford is older than Sanders and his number have not improved as MrPerfect1 just proved. you stated that Bucks fans would love to trade away Sanders for Horford, and that is just delustional and that is a fact. you can homer up Horford as much as you want, but outside of Atlanta he is nothing speical.

You still willing to stand by this statement? I contend MIL would trade Sanders for a bag of pretzels right now...

[PandaKidd]

It's hard to discuss, intelligently, a matter with someone whose arguments are beaten down, only to see him say, "Oh yeah? Well what about this next argument?" Could you try to defend your own points, rather than just moving on to new ones?

You said that Horford and Sanders are 4 years apart. In truth, they are 2 years and 4 months apart.
You said that Horford has "already hit his peak." uga_dawgs24 pointed out that Horford has improved each year of his career - clear proof that he has not reached his peak.
You said that Horford has only 3 good years left - years where he will be "relevant," yet fail to note that that means that Sanders has only 5 more years, so he won't be "relevant" for that time, either.

When shown you were wrong, all you could do is challenge us to come to the Bucks' board. You didn't defend your ideas; you didn't say, "My bad;" you didn't even say ouch. You pretended your defeat never happened. Why should we care to debate a poster who cannot defend his posts? If you don't believe in your arguments, why should we bother?

no, no matter how you spin it, Horford is older than Sanders and his number have not improved as MrPerfect1 just proved. you stated that Bucks fans would love to trade away Sanders for Horford, and that is just delustional and that is a fact. you can homer up Horford as much as you want, but outside of Atlanta he is nothing speical.

You still willing to stand by this statement? I contend MIL would trade Sanders for a bag of pretzels right now...

I would take Sanders for cheap as a project.

I was wrong about Jennings, but man Monta fooled us all too.